You know what's exasperating? The hypocrisy and arbitrariness of these kinds of crises. I'm eternally fascinated how variable it is that we either have to outright accept (not tolerate, accept) others as they are, at our peril, or we have to force them to conform to our, sometimes arbitrary, sometimes subjective, view of the world. If we're supposed to accept someone else unconditionally for their politics, their sexuality, their gender (or lack thereof), or any of a million other things, shouldn't we then also accept their chosen expression of well-being (or not)?
As always, I remain,
Stadler