Look, I don't know who to reply to directly, but all the excuses in the world don't change the fact that at the end of the day, the best "athlete" doesn't necessarily win the most games. We can go back and parse each of the TEN Super Bowls that Brady was in and come up with calls that went for him, and calls that went against him. The end of the day, in 20 years in the league, he's been in the Super Bowl HALF the time. He's personally got more Super Bowl wins than any ORGANIZATION in the league. Steve Spagnola is no slouch; he's done it before, battling and beating Brady in the Super Bowl, but he couldn't dial it up this time. Brady out-gamed him. I'm no Todd Bowles fan (the idea that Arians would step aside and let him take over; if I'm a Bucs fan, I'm screaming NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! like Luke Skywalker!) but he outgamed Eric Bieniemy. He's known for being a blitzer, and he blitzed, what, five times, max?
Patrick Mahomes is a superb athlete; that sidearm throw from the sideline, even though it fell incomplete, was one of the best throws I've ever seen. It fell incomplete. At some point, though, the game has to be played; this is certainly NOT the first time that a superb athlete has been on the losing side of a strategic encounter. This is, frankly, how Bill Belichick has made his name over the years; his stock in trade is beating superb and in many cases superior athletes with superior execution and a superior game plan. I think Nick Burleson said it best (and I'm paraphrasing): "I would never call an NFL team "soft", especially not in a game like this, but one team came out far more aggresive and tough, from the opening whistle until the confetti fell, and that's why they won this game". I think that's right. Penalties or no penalties, Mathieu was defeated about midway through the second quarter.