Author Topic: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation  (Read 259170 times)

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline King Postwhore

  • Couch Potato
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 59671
  • Gender: Male
  • Take that Beethoven, you deaf bastard!!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2835 on: June 17, 2016, 03:47:13 PM »
There was something always missing from Generations that made it seem average.
I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down'.” - Bob Newhart
So wait, we're spelling it wrong and king is spelling it right? What is going on here? :lol -- BlobVanDam
"Oh, I am definitely a jackass!" - TAC

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2836 on: June 17, 2016, 03:48:31 PM »
I thought the whole film has this aura of warmth. I guess I can't describe it.


Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30843
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2837 on: June 17, 2016, 04:43:54 PM »
I thought the whole film has this aura of warmth. I guess I can't describe it.
It was certainly an orange film. I agree about the warmness of it. I just don't' find it particularly entertaining or interesting.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2838 on: June 17, 2016, 04:59:07 PM »
Probably because I saw it in the cinema in 1994 when I was 16.


Offline Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36354
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2839 on: June 17, 2016, 05:19:42 PM »
Generations is an odd one to me. I really like (most) of the character moments (probably for similar reasons that Barto doesn't) but it does have a rather awful plot that was clearly forced to help Shatner show up.

Insurrection has less good character moments (though quite a few good ones) and a better plot that still isn't great. So if Generations got an A- or B+ for characters and a D for plot, Insurrection gets a B- for characters and a C for plot.

First Contact gets an A for both, sucks people here seem to dislike it so much, but such is life. No big deal.

Nemesis gets a D for both of those things.

Don't even get me started on the reboot movies. Yea, I'm the weird guy who really didn't like Trek 09.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2840 on: June 17, 2016, 10:00:00 PM »
Generations is an odd one to me. I really like (most) of the character moments (probably for similar reasons that Barto doesn't) but it does have a rather awful plot that was clearly forced to help Shatner show up.

I also really like the character moments, and think it has some of the best in the Trek films, but the Nexus plot has too many issues, and forcing the original cast in there was a detriment to the movie. It didn't need it. Still a solidly enjoyable film imo, but not a top Trek film. Also the Enterprise D never looked better.

First Contact gets an A for both, sucks people here seem to dislike it so much, but such is life. No big deal.

:dunno: I love it. A top 3 Trek film for me along with TWOK and TVH.
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36354
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2841 on: June 17, 2016, 10:08:03 PM »
ADMIT THAT YOU HATE IT!!!

SAY IT! SAY IT!

fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2842 on: June 17, 2016, 10:17:40 PM »
NOOOO!
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2843 on: June 18, 2016, 03:36:39 AM »
THESE FILMS ARE RANK :

TNG

Gen
First Contact
Nemesis
Insurrection

TOS

Khan
Country
Voyage
Motion Picture
Spock
Frontier

Offline Polarbear

  • Posts: 1504
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2844 on: June 18, 2016, 07:17:18 AM »
1. Khan
2. Country
3. Voyage
4. Contact
5. ST09
6. Spock
7. Darkness
8. MP


9. Insurrection
10. Generations
11. Frontier

12. Nemesis

Offline Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36354
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2845 on: June 18, 2016, 12:53:40 PM »
Another ranking? Eh sure.

1. Khan
2. First Contact
3. Country
4. Voyage
5. Generations
6. Search for Spock
7. Insurrection
8. Final Frontier
9. Nemesis
10. Motion Picture
11. ST09
12. Darkness.

I hate rankings, but that'll do for now pig.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline The King in Crimson

  • Stuck in a glass dome since 1914!
  • Posts: 4002
  • Gender: Male
  • Mr. Sandman, Give Me A Dream
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2846 on: June 18, 2016, 01:47:10 PM »
1. Country
2. Khan
3. Voyage
4. Contact
5. Spock
6. Generations
7. Frontier
8. Nemesis
9. 2001: A Trek Odyssey
10. '09
11. Insurrection
12. Khan II: Into Blandness

Offline jammindude

  • Posts: 15404
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2847 on: June 18, 2016, 02:12:01 PM »
1. Insurrection (yes...you read that correctly)
2. Wrath of Khan
3. Undiscovered Country
4. Star Trek '09
5. Voyage Home
6. First Contact
7. Search for Spock
8. The Motion Picture
9. Generations
10. Into Darkness
11. The Final Frontier



























12. Nemesis (seriously the only one of the 12 that I truly cannot stomach to watch.  Just an absolute steaming pile of vomit, bile, urine, and diarrhea all mixed together)
"Better the pride that resides in a citizen of the world.
Than the pride that divides when a colorful rag is unfurled." - Neil Peart

The Jammin Dude Show - https://www.youtube.com/user/jammindude

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30843
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2848 on: June 18, 2016, 02:38:09 PM »
Khan
TMP
Voyage
Undiscovered
Search
Insurrection
First Contact
Generations
2009
ID
That one with God in it
Nemesis.

Ranking 2-4 is really tough. I consider them interchangeable within those slots.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30843
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2849 on: June 18, 2016, 03:10:08 PM »

Well the lawsuit itself is mostly related to the standard IP stuff.
The reason they're douchebags is because they crowdfunded over a million dollars for their fan film so they could all get salaries for their work, and purchase a large studio to start their own scifi franchise, directly profiting off Star Trek's IP, and on social media they've done nothing but bag the shit out of Star Trek and talk about how much better their fan film is. After the lawsuit started, they made a rant about how they were only being sued because Axanar had the superior product and they didn't want competition, and claimed they were going to win the lawsuit with the best lawyers, and I think they even tried to counter sue, and in defense of the lawsuit itself, claimed their fan film didn't even resemble Star Trek's trademarks.

Basically, CBS/Paramount have been incredibly lenient with people crowdfunding fan film as long as there's transparency that it's all going directly towards equipment/supplies to make the film, and no profit is being made, and Axanar flagrantly disregarded that to profit from it, then bit the hand that feeds them.

Also, the guy in charge apparently has a long history of dodgy shit.
After actually watching the proof of concept I think he might well be right. That was pretty slick. The guy that played Garth didn't work for me, but according to wikiP that was actually the writer and the role will be done professionally for the feature. The only other problem was that the Klingon wasn't particularly Klingon-like, but since this was done as a documentary it's not real telling. All in all I'd really like to see the feature version of that, which is a whole lot more than I can say about Paramount's effort.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36354
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2850 on: June 19, 2016, 12:33:56 PM »
R.I.P. Anton Yelchin.  :'(
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2851 on: June 19, 2016, 12:37:59 PM »
WTF that's out of the blue. RIP.
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2852 on: June 19, 2016, 12:38:42 PM »
Fucks sake :( :( :(.

Offline Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36354
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2853 on: June 19, 2016, 12:39:57 PM »
Yea, I was a big fan of his. He seemed like a pretty cool guy too, pretty quiet and shy.

Damn. I was totally shocked.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2854 on: June 19, 2016, 12:48:42 PM »
Ugh. Shitty news. Guess this film series is over then...

Offline Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36354
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2855 on: June 19, 2016, 12:50:30 PM »
Ugh. Shitty news. Guess this film series is over then...

That I doubt. Walter Koenig is still alive!

I mean, it's not like Chekov was necessary in the reboots anyway. You can literally get rid of Chekov and Sulu, give their lines to a plant alien or something and no one would notice.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2856 on: June 19, 2016, 12:51:57 PM »
He was so young with a lot of potential, and to go in such circumstances is a shock and a shame.
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2857 on: June 19, 2016, 12:54:45 PM »
I really hope Beyond does really well now.

Offline Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36354
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2858 on: June 19, 2016, 12:55:15 PM »
He was so young with a lot of potential, and to go in such circumstances is a shock and a shame.

Yea, I am extremely confused by the actual events that happened. Very true though, a real damn shame.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2859 on: June 19, 2016, 12:55:34 PM »
I really hope Beyond does really well now.

Why? Because someone died?

I'd rather hope they end with this one and don't have to deal with writing out the character.
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36354
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2860 on: June 19, 2016, 12:56:18 PM »
I really hope Beyond does really well now.

I mean, I'd hate for a film to do well simply because an actor died. I doubt Anton had the star power to make the masses embrace the film for his death. If the film is good, I hope it does well. I say we just let the film stand on its own legs.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2861 on: June 19, 2016, 12:57:26 PM »
I really hope Beyond does really well now.

Why? Because someone died?

I'd rather hope they end with this one and don't have to deal with writing out the character.

I would be ok if Beyond was the last one. I thought Nemesis would be the last one in 2002. But it's a shitty thing to happen in the 50th anniversary year.

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30843
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2862 on: June 19, 2016, 01:08:55 PM »
He was so young with a lot of potential, and to go in such circumstances is a shock and a shame.

Yea, I am extremely confused by the actual events that happened. Very true though, a real damn shame.
I can easily see how he was hit by his own car, but for it to be fatal is bizarre. People start their car before remembering something and jump out all the time. If you drive a stick might to forget to set the parking brake. We've all done that before. It's just odd for a car to pick up much speed like that, unless it's really steep or a really long roll. Definitely some very bad luck for the kid.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline King Postwhore

  • Couch Potato
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 59671
  • Gender: Male
  • Take that Beethoven, you deaf bastard!!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2863 on: June 19, 2016, 01:25:04 PM »
Damn.
I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down'.” - Bob Newhart
So wait, we're spelling it wrong and king is spelling it right? What is going on here? :lol -- BlobVanDam
"Oh, I am definitely a jackass!" - TAC

Offline Polarbear

  • Posts: 1504
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2864 on: June 20, 2016, 12:11:02 AM »
Just read the news about Anton Yelchin. R.I.P

I think they could recast or write Chekov out of future sequels depending how well Beyond does, but it would honestly be pretty tasteless IMO.

Has anyone seen Green Room? He was starring in it, along with the one and only Patrick Stewart!

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2865 on: June 20, 2016, 12:22:14 AM »
I didn't even know Anton Yelchin was in Green Room until I was checking his filmography yesterday, but I really want to see the movie because of Patrick Stewart anyway.

I don't think they'd recast Chekov given the circumstances, they'll probably start the next movie with Chekov already gone, either passed away during a mission, or reassigned with a different character in his place. I wonder if it's too late to dedicate Star Trek Beyond to him?
For many reasons, I think it would be best to just finish up with Beyond.
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline hefdaddy42

  • Et in Arcadia Ego
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 53569
  • Gender: Male
  • Postwhore Emeritus
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2866 on: June 20, 2016, 07:59:46 AM »
I mean, it's not like Chekov was necessary in the reboots anyway.
Was Checkov EVER necessary?  Other than TWOK, I never really thought of him as an essential character.  He was just, like, the top redshirt or something.  Oh, and Russian because of diversity and world peace.
Hef is right on all things. Except for when I disagree with him. In which case he's probably still right.

Offline Cool Chris

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 13676
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2867 on: June 20, 2016, 10:02:08 AM »
Incorrect. He was created to entice the Monkees fanbase, not appease or acknowlegde the Russians.
"Nostalgia is just the ability to forget the things that sucked" - Nelson DeMille, 'Up Country'

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2868 on: June 20, 2016, 10:09:08 AM »
Incorrect. He was created to entice the Monkees fanbase, not appease or acknowlegde the Russians.

Why not both?
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30843
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2869 on: June 20, 2016, 10:13:28 AM »
Yeah, definitely both. Certainly wasn't about appeasement, though. Just multiculturalism.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson