Author Topic: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation  (Read 259964 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2800 on: June 06, 2016, 09:17:28 AM »
Pound Sterling.

£30 is $60 AUS...


How come if you lot are all British exports :lol - How come you use the dollar ?

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2801 on: June 06, 2016, 09:38:25 AM »
Why don't you use the Euro?

This kind of confusion is why they abolish currency on Earth in the future!
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2802 on: June 10, 2016, 12:38:44 PM »
So Writer Joe Menosky is writing for Star Trek 2017.

According to Blob - he's written some of the best episodes of TNG and Voyager.

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2803 on: June 10, 2016, 12:41:02 PM »
He definitely worked on many of the best of Voyager, not sure on TNG, I don't remember it well enough. But definitely some good ones there too.
This is the first firmly positive news for the new series for me.
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Online El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30889
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2804 on: June 10, 2016, 01:00:23 PM »
He definitely worked on many of the best of Voyager, not sure on TNG, I don't remember it well enough. But definitely some good ones there too.
This is the first firmly positive news for the new series for me.
Dude wrote some very good episodes for all of the series. Dude also wrote some of the very worst episodes. For every episode I really like there's one that I can't stand to even think about.

TNG is split down the middle. Darmok, Clues, Conundrum are all great. Interface (Geordi's mom), In Theory (Data's girlfriend) and Emergence (the ship's computer evolves into sentience) are just terrible. Hell, he even wrote both halves of Times Arrow, which were great and awful respectively.

Same holds for Voyager. It's surprising to me that the same person who wrote Timeless, Blink of an Eye and Living Witness also wrote Distant Origin and The Thaw.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2805 on: June 11, 2016, 01:03:29 AM »
Oh sure, there are stinkers in there too, with Distant Origin being my personal most disliked episode of Voyager even over Threshold, but for me the list is more in his favour than against it. At the very least, it shows his potential. Many of my favourite Voyager episodes involve him, including Timeless, Blink of an Eye, Year of Hell, and Living Witness is also up there. This is actually the first news on the new series to really interest me on the new series.
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline Progmetty

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 7129
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2806 on: June 12, 2016, 11:52:29 PM »
Back after a little hiatus, watched Catspaw, awful episode :lol
I wouldn't want somebody with 18 kids to mow my damn lawn, based on a longstanding bias I have against crazy fucks.

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2807 on: June 13, 2016, 12:16:30 AM »
Wasn't that episode meant for halloween or something? Yeah, awful episode. :lol
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2808 on: June 15, 2016, 06:27:48 PM »
Here's an easy question.

Lt. Saavik. Robin Curtis or Kirstie Alley?

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2809 on: June 15, 2016, 06:42:58 PM »
Secondly it seems the Axanar lawsuit is back on.

Seems the guy in charge of Axanar can't stop being a dick.

Can they make STContinues official instead ?

Online Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36396
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2810 on: June 15, 2016, 06:45:03 PM »
Secondly it seems the Axanar lawsuit is back on.

Seems the guy in charge of Axanar can't stop being a dick.

Can they make STContinues official instead ?

I honestly know just about nothing about this. Any chance someone can sum it up for me?
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Online El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30889
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2811 on: June 15, 2016, 07:12:11 PM »
Here's an easy question.

Lt. Saavik. Robin Curtis or Kirstie Alley?
Depends on what you're asking. If you're asking who's hotter, as is usually the case when somebody says Girl A or Girl B, then it's Kirstie Alley by a light year. Back in the day she was smoking hot. If it's who was the better Vulcan, neither of them were particularly good. Kirstie's Saavik seemd pretty clueless, though she made it look really good. Robin Curtis's was just bland. Had they actually made Valeris Saavik, as they intended, then Kim Catrall would be the easy pick. She was the best Vulcan.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Online Orbert

  • Recovering Musician
  • EZBoard Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 19380
  • Gender: Male
  • In and around the lake
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2812 on: June 15, 2016, 09:27:02 PM »
I agree with all of that.

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2813 on: June 15, 2016, 11:12:31 PM »
Secondly it seems the Axanar lawsuit is back on.

Seems the guy in charge of Axanar can't stop being a dick.

Can they make STContinues official instead ?

Apparently they never actually dropped the lawsuit, but they were trying to settle it out of court. But the Axanar crew are idiots, and they deserve to get their asses run into the ground.
Star Trek Continues is the perfect example of how to run a fan film all around. Nothing but class and quality.
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Online Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36396
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2814 on: June 15, 2016, 11:46:48 PM »
Secondly it seems the Axanar lawsuit is back on.

Seems the guy in charge of Axanar can't stop being a dick.

Can they make STContinues official instead ?

Apparently they never actually dropped the lawsuit, but they were trying to settle it out of court. But the Axanar crew are idiots, and they deserve to get their asses run into the ground.
Star Trek Continues is the perfect example of how to run a fan film all around. Nothing but class and quality.

So...Blob....care to summarize this stuff? I looked up the lawsuit, but I don't see why the Axanar guys are such douche bags. Insight pwease?
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2815 on: June 16, 2016, 12:08:04 AM »
Secondly it seems the Axanar lawsuit is back on.

Seems the guy in charge of Axanar can't stop being a dick.

Can they make STContinues official instead ?

Apparently they never actually dropped the lawsuit, but they were trying to settle it out of court. But the Axanar crew are idiots, and they deserve to get their asses run into the ground.
Star Trek Continues is the perfect example of how to run a fan film all around. Nothing but class and quality.

So...Blob....care to summarize this stuff? I looked up the lawsuit, but I don't see why the Axanar guys are such douche bags. Insight pwease?

Well the lawsuit itself is mostly related to the standard IP stuff.
The reason they're douchebags is because they crowdfunded over a million dollars for their fan film so they could all get salaries for their work, and purchase a large studio to start their own scifi franchise, directly profiting off Star Trek's IP, and on social media they've done nothing but bag the shit out of Star Trek and talk about how much better their fan film is. After the lawsuit started, they made a rant about how they were only being sued because Axanar had the superior product and they didn't want competition, and claimed they were going to win the lawsuit with the best lawyers, and I think they even tried to counter sue, and in defense of the lawsuit itself, claimed their fan film didn't even resemble Star Trek's trademarks.

Basically, CBS/Paramount have been incredibly lenient with people crowdfunding fan film as long as there's transparency that it's all going directly towards equipment/supplies to make the film, and no profit is being made, and Axanar flagrantly disregarded that to profit from it, then bit the hand that feeds them.

Also, the guy in charge apparently has a long history of dodgy shit.
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Online Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36396
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2816 on: June 16, 2016, 12:21:14 AM »
Just skimmed through "Prelude to Axanar" for a few minutes. They sure do like to film people talking from the side.


But it might be better than Into Darkness.  :loser:
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Online hefdaddy42

  • Et in Arcadia Ego
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 53667
  • Gender: Male
  • Postwhore Emeritus
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2817 on: June 16, 2016, 07:02:58 AM »
lol
Hef is right on all things. Except for when I disagree with him. In which case he's probably still right.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2818 on: June 16, 2016, 09:42:30 AM »
Nothing is better than Into Darkness.

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2819 on: June 16, 2016, 09:49:59 AM »
Nothing is better than Into Darkness.

You're right. Watching nothing would be preferable to watching Into Darkness. :biggrin:
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2820 on: June 16, 2016, 10:19:46 AM »
Nothing is better than Into Darkness.

You're right. Watching nothing would be preferable to watching Into Darkness. :biggrin:


Well done for not taking that obvious bait.

Oh.

Online El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30889
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2821 on: June 16, 2016, 01:57:09 PM »
I generally disregard fan films since they usually look like high school productions. These guys actually made it look pretty good. I take it the Prelude thing is just a proof of concept. Where are they with the feature?


edit: Also, the uniforms don't match the ships. I take it this is after Enterprise but before TOS?
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2822 on: June 16, 2016, 02:02:01 PM »
Star Trek Renegades looked terrible and Koenig sounded like he really could not be bothered.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2823 on: June 16, 2016, 02:11:49 PM »
Here's an easy question.

Lt. Saavik. Robin Curtis or Kirstie Alley?
Depends on what you're asking. If you're asking who's hotter, as is usually the case when somebody says Girl A or Girl B, then it's Kirstie Alley by a light year. Back in the day she was smoking hot. If it's who was the better Vulcan, neither of them were particularly good. Kirstie's Saavik seemd pretty clueless, though she made it look really good. Robin Curtis's was just bland. Had they actually made Valeris Saavik, as they intended, then Kim Catrall would be the easy pick. She was the best Vulcan.


I looked up Kirstie Alley and she looks ok for her age. But she's still a nut case.

Offline Polarbear

  • Posts: 1504
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2824 on: June 16, 2016, 02:15:26 PM »
Nothing is better than Into Darkness.

You're right. Watching nothing would be preferable to watching Into Darkness. :biggrin:

Honestly, i would watch Into Darkness a hundred times, before watching Generations, Insurrection or Nemesis ever again. :D

I haven't been following news about the new series, but i'm very excited to hear that Nicholas Meyer and Joe Menosky are involved with the project! That is a very good sign.


Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2825 on: June 16, 2016, 02:17:57 PM »

Honestly, i would watch Into Darkness a hundred times, before watching Generations, Insurrection or Nemesis ever again. :D

THIS.

Even though I don't actually mind Generations or Nemesis. I enjoyed Into Darkness a LOT more and it has longevity for me.

Insurrection got old really quickly. As did Nemesis.

I was even really bored watching First Contact last time and I could put on Into Darkness like right now and watch it in full easily.

Online El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30889
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2826 on: June 16, 2016, 02:40:52 PM »
Here's an easy question.

Lt. Saavik. Robin Curtis or Kirstie Alley?
Depends on what you're asking. If you're asking who's hotter, as is usually the case when somebody says Girl A or Girl B, then it's Kirstie Alley by a light year. Back in the day she was smoking hot. If it's who was the better Vulcan, neither of them were particularly good. Kirstie's Saavik seemd pretty clueless, though she made it look really good. Robin Curtis's was just bland. Had they actually made Valeris Saavik, as they intended, then Kim Catrall would be the easy pick. She was the best Vulcan.


I looked up Kirstie Alley and she looks ok for her age. But she's still a nut case.
Well, yeah, she's a Scientologist. That hasn't managed to help with her weight issues. However, I was definitely referring to back in the day. Back when she played Saavik she looked fantastic. Her first season on Cheers, as well.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2827 on: June 16, 2016, 02:51:36 PM »






This was in January this year. At least she doesn't look like she's had loads of Botox .

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2828 on: June 16, 2016, 02:56:43 PM »

Online King Postwhore

  • Couch Potato
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 59759
  • Gender: Male
  • Take that Beethoven, you deaf bastard!!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2829 on: June 16, 2016, 04:01:34 PM »
Kirstie Alley is slightly off center that she would do things to you that would make Vulcans blush. 
I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down'.” - Bob Newhart
So wait, we're spelling it wrong and king is spelling it right? What is going on here? :lol -- BlobVanDam
"Oh, I am definitely a jackass!" - TAC

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2830 on: June 16, 2016, 09:50:38 PM »
Honestly, i would watch Into Darkness a hundred times, before watching Generations, Insurrection or Nemesis ever again. :D

Oh god, I'd rather claw my own ears and eyes out than be forced to watch ID a hundred times. Struggled to even do it once at the cinema, and couldn't manage it twice. Generations, Insurrection and Nemesis are all far superior films, even as bad as Nemesis is.
« Last Edit: June 16, 2016, 10:11:20 PM by BlobVanDam »
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2831 on: June 17, 2016, 02:22:53 AM »
Whereas I could easily watch it over Insurrection.

Online El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30889
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2832 on: June 17, 2016, 01:54:36 PM »
Whereas I could easily watch it over Insurrection.
I watched Insurrection a couple of weeks ago, along with a couple of the other crappy movies. Couldn't bring myself to watch Nemisis. Started it. Skipped to three random points in the movie. Decided I'd rather watch nothing.

All things considered Insurrection winds up somewhere in the middle. It's certainly ahead of Nemesis and that ST-V nonsense, and possibly First Contact, as well.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2833 on: June 17, 2016, 03:11:27 PM »
The last time I threw on Nemesis I ended up enjoying it a lot more than i was expecting.

I can never sit through Insurrection.

My favourite TNG movie is actually Generations. It has a warmth in both tone and colour palette and is dripping with emotion throughout whereas First Contact is kinda cold and dark and sterile

compared and there's not much emotional content.

Online El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30889
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2834 on: June 17, 2016, 03:41:45 PM »
I never got dripping with emotion out of Generations. It's alright, but it also seemed a bit contrived. Some fan-wank in there, I think. Crashing the Enterprise. Bringing back those idiotic Klingon sisters to be secondary bad guys. Data with the emotion chip. It just seemed a little heavy-handed in making sure it didn't come off as a normal TNG.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson