Author Topic: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation  (Read 259189 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2380 on: December 17, 2015, 10:00:01 AM »
I thought so too. I've read a lot of quotes from Lin and Pegg recently and they both say a lot of positive stuff.

Both of them were like " It's not the trailer I would have chosen and it doesn't represent the film at all. "

Offline jingle.boy

  • I'm so ronery; so sad and ronery
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 45074
  • Gender: Male
  • DTF's resident deceased dictator
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2381 on: December 17, 2015, 10:16:10 AM »
I've read a lot over the last few days which makes me look forward to it - but whatever.  I'm done. I'm not posting here again until i've seen the film.

hhmmm... only took 8 posts, and 14 hours.  Welcome back.
That's a word salad - and take it from me, I know word salad
I fear for the day when something happens on the right that is SO nuts that even Stadler says "That's crazy".
Quote from: Puppies_On_Acid
Remember the mark of a great vocalist is if TAC hates them with a special passion

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2382 on: December 17, 2015, 10:21:26 AM »
Someone said something I actually agreed with.

Offline hefdaddy42

  • Et in Arcadia Ego
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 53569
  • Gender: Male
  • Postwhore Emeritus
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2383 on: December 17, 2015, 11:00:44 AM »
I've read a lot over the last few days which makes me look forward to it - but whatever.  I'm done. I'm not posting here again until i've seen the film.

hhmmm... only took 8 posts, and 14 hours.  Welcome back.
lol
Hef is right on all things. Except for when I disagree with him. In which case he's probably still right.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2384 on: December 17, 2015, 11:01:14 AM »
Remember it's not about me.

Offline hefdaddy42

  • Et in Arcadia Ego
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 53569
  • Gender: Male
  • Postwhore Emeritus
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2385 on: December 17, 2015, 11:05:44 AM »
Remember it's not about me.
Only when you make it that way.
Hef is right on all things. Except for when I disagree with him. In which case he's probably still right.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2386 on: December 17, 2015, 11:10:40 AM »
Here's a fun little task for Hef, El Barto and Blob.

List all the things you enjoyed about Star Trek (2009) and Into Darkness.

I set this challenge once before when Into Darkness came out after i'd listed all the problems with which I agreed with.

Nobody took me up on it then. And will probably just brush it off now. ;)

Offline Implode

  • Lord of the Squids
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 5821
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2387 on: December 17, 2015, 11:10:57 AM »
I've read a lot over the last few days which makes me look forward to it - but whatever.  I'm done. I'm not posting here again until i've seen the film.

hhmmm... only took 8 posts, and 14 hours.  Welcome back.

I think we all should know by now that when someone on the internet says, "I'm done. I'm going to stop posting," the best response is, "Okay. See you tomorrow!"

Offline jingle.boy

  • I'm so ronery; so sad and ronery
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 45074
  • Gender: Male
  • DTF's resident deceased dictator
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2388 on: December 17, 2015, 11:34:52 AM »
I've read a lot over the last few days which makes me look forward to it - but whatever.  I'm done. I'm not posting here again until i've seen the film.

hhmmm... only took 8 posts, and 14 hours.  Welcome back.

I think we all should know by now that when someone on the internet says, "I'm done. I'm going to stop posting," the best response is, "Okay. See you tomorrow!"

Unless Hef grants their wishes, and perma bans them.

Ok, what did I like about the first 2 ST movies:

2009:
- revived a franchise that I love
- casting of Quinto for Spock; Urban for Bones; Pegg for Scotty
- the emotional scene of Hemsworth/Kirk Sr sacrificing himself
- Bana's performance, and the Nemo's singular focus on revenge no matter the cost
- Rachel Nichols half naked (despite being green)

Into Darkness
- the special effects during the action sequences
- the cinematography on the opening planet
- Carol 1/2 naked
- Khan kicking ass on Kronos
- Cumberbatch's performance

That's about it.
That's a word salad - and take it from me, I know word salad
I fear for the day when something happens on the right that is SO nuts that even Stadler says "That's crazy".
Quote from: Puppies_On_Acid
Remember the mark of a great vocalist is if TAC hates them with a special passion

Offline hefdaddy42

  • Et in Arcadia Ego
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 53569
  • Gender: Male
  • Postwhore Emeritus
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2389 on: December 17, 2015, 11:37:54 AM »
*brushes it off*
Hef is right on all things. Except for when I disagree with him. In which case he's probably still right.

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30843
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2390 on: December 17, 2015, 12:21:00 PM »
That's actually encouraging. Thanks, Implode!
I agree. It looked he like was trying to be diplomatic, but really thought the trailer shit all over them. I'm still not hugely enthusiastic, but mostly because I think what I want just isn't possible in the current paradigm. Nevertheless, he did seem to be implying that there were a lot more elements that I've been missing that weren't in the first two.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2391 on: December 17, 2015, 12:24:10 PM »
I don't know about anyone else but that trailer just shouted TOS to me. Albeit with a huge budget AND it also said " This isn't Into Darkness ".

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30843
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2392 on: December 17, 2015, 12:27:25 PM »
Here's a fun little task for Hef, El Barto and Blob.

List all the things you enjoyed about Star Trek (2009) and Into Darkness.

I set this challenge once before when Into Darkness came out after i'd listed all the problems with which I agreed with.

Nobody took me up on it then. And will probably just brush it off now. ;)
I think I already did. Since it was a pretty short list you might not have noticed it. I really enjoyed the characterizations of the principle cast. I think Pine, Quinto and Urban are great as the characters they play. I also liked a lot of the dialog. The writers can't write a good screenplay to save their lives, but somebody on that team has a nice way with words. I also thought there was some good humor in them; particularly the first one. As I've stated on numerous occasions, I can watch one or both of them while skipping over about 50% or so of the content and enjoy it quite a bit. There's not much story left, but the stories weren't very good to begin with. As a collection of various interactions between those three it's perfectly entertaining.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30843
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2393 on: December 17, 2015, 12:31:40 PM »
- casting of Quinto for Spock; Urban for Bones; Pegg for Scotty
You didn't care for Pine? He was a little too over the top, but then so is Kirk. He's the character that has to get the most development, and even though I don't see that happening, if we do get to see the swagger Pine gives him combined with the seriousness Kirk puts into his responsibilities it'll be a damn fine characterization. I saw the bits and pieces there early on.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2394 on: December 17, 2015, 12:47:31 PM »
Pine's most Kirk moment from Into Darkness :

" You, Happy? "

Offline hefdaddy42

  • Et in Arcadia Ego
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 53569
  • Gender: Male
  • Postwhore Emeritus
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2395 on: December 17, 2015, 12:47:51 PM »
I didn't care for Pine or Pegg.

I thought Quinto and Urban were spot on.
Hef is right on all things. Except for when I disagree with him. In which case he's probably still right.

Offline King Postwhore

  • Couch Potato
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 59671
  • Gender: Male
  • Take that Beethoven, you deaf bastard!!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2396 on: December 17, 2015, 01:20:53 PM »
I don't mind Pine at all.  I like him in fact.  Pegg was a little to over the top but not that is turned me off.
I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down'.” - Bob Newhart
So wait, we're spelling it wrong and king is spelling it right? What is going on here? :lol -- BlobVanDam
"Oh, I am definitely a jackass!" - TAC

Offline jingle.boy

  • I'm so ronery; so sad and ronery
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 45074
  • Gender: Male
  • DTF's resident deceased dictator
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2397 on: December 17, 2015, 01:43:57 PM »
I don't mind Pine at all.  I like him in fact.  Pegg was a little to over the top but not that is turned me off.

I agree about Pegg.  Pine, I thought did a horrible job resurrecting Kirk.

Urban>Quinto >>> Pegg >>>>>Yelchin >>>>>>>>> Pine.

And don't get me started on Uhura or Sulu.  As much as I love Zoe, her casting did nothing to align with the image of Uhura; same with Sulu.  The only resemblances were that Zoe is dark skinned; Cho is Asian. 
That's a word salad - and take it from me, I know word salad
I fear for the day when something happens on the right that is SO nuts that even Stadler says "That's crazy".
Quote from: Puppies_On_Acid
Remember the mark of a great vocalist is if TAC hates them with a special passion

Offline hefdaddy42

  • Et in Arcadia Ego
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 53569
  • Gender: Male
  • Postwhore Emeritus
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2398 on: December 17, 2015, 02:59:43 PM »
I agree.

Also not a fan of the Uhura/Spock romance.  At all.
Hef is right on all things. Except for when I disagree with him. In which case he's probably still right.

Offline jingle.boy

  • I'm so ronery; so sad and ronery
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 45074
  • Gender: Male
  • DTF's resident deceased dictator
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2399 on: December 17, 2015, 03:42:56 PM »
I agree.

Also not a fan of the Uhura/Spock romance.  At all.

I wanted to rage punch someone over that.  Like any chick would fall in love with an emotionless soul.  That was pretty much the worst part of the story.  Absolutely zero need for that.
That's a word salad - and take it from me, I know word salad
I fear for the day when something happens on the right that is SO nuts that even Stadler says "That's crazy".
Quote from: Puppies_On_Acid
Remember the mark of a great vocalist is if TAC hates them with a special passion

Offline Orbert

  • Recovering Musician
  • EZBoard Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 19369
  • Gender: Male
  • In and around the lake
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2400 on: December 17, 2015, 03:53:19 PM »

Offline Orbert

  • Recovering Musician
  • EZBoard Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 19369
  • Gender: Male
  • In and around the lake
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2401 on: December 17, 2015, 03:53:47 PM »
(but actually, I agree)

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2402 on: December 17, 2015, 10:43:06 PM »
I agree.

Also not a fan of the Uhura/Spock romance.  At all.

I wanted to rage punch someone over that.  Like any chick would fall in love with an emotionless soul.  That was pretty much the worst part of the story.  Absolutely zero need for that.

Every generic Hollywood movie needs a love story shoehorned in sideways, because obviously then they've got the entire female audience.

Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male

Offline kaos2900

  • Posts: 2977
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2404 on: December 18, 2015, 06:46:35 AM »
That trailer was awful! Rage against the machine and Trek do not and should not mix.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2405 on: December 18, 2015, 07:32:03 AM »
I agree 100%.


:neverusethis:

Offline hefdaddy42

  • Et in Arcadia Ego
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 53569
  • Gender: Male
  • Postwhore Emeritus
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2406 on: December 18, 2015, 08:19:00 AM »
https://trekmovie.com/2015/12/17/pegg-interview-from-set-of-beyond/

Quote
…we want it to be about them on that five-year mission. In fact, two years into that five-year mission, and how that impacted them personally and what it meant to be out in space that long. And we liked the idea of also, on the fiftieth anniversary, looking at Roddenberry’s original vision and questioning it. The whole notion of the Federation and whether it’s a good thing or a bad thing and how productive is inclusivity and what is the true cost of expansion.
:| :( :tdwn
Hef is right on all things. Except for when I disagree with him. In which case he's probably still right.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2407 on: December 18, 2015, 08:23:56 AM »
Yeah what the fuck ?

I just want a bad guy wanting revenge again.


I don't want anything new for a change...


I know how much Blob *loves* the whole "utopian future" stuff from TNG.

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2408 on: December 18, 2015, 08:31:40 AM »
Quote
…we want it to be about them on that five-year mission. In fact, two years into that five-year mission, and how that impacted them personally and what it meant to be out in space that long. And we liked the idea of also, on the fiftieth anniversary, looking at Roddenberry’s original vision and questioning it. The whole notion of the Federation and whether it’s a good thing or a bad thing and how productive is inclusivity and what is the true cost of expansion.
:| :( :tdwn

Yeah, that raised an eyebrow for me too. "To celebrate the 50th anniversary and Gene Roddenberry's vision, we're getting back to what Star Wars is about, except we're questioning it and missing the point entirely."

Yeah what the fuck ?

I just want a bad guy wanting revenge again.


I don't want anything new for a change...


I know how much Blob *loves* the whole "utopian future" stuff from TNG.

I legitimately don't know what your point is, or what parts of this post were supposed to be sarcasm or not, or if you're just trying to stir because nobody is agreeing with you on how bad this movie looks, but maybe you can let me know how wrong I am about the film, since you've clearly seen it judging by your post declaring you wouldn't post again until you had.
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline ZirconBlue

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 2581
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2409 on: December 18, 2015, 08:37:45 AM »
I agree.

Also not a fan of the Uhura/Spock romance.  At all.

I wanted to rage punch someone over that.  Like any chick would fall in love with an emotionless soul.  That was pretty much the worst part of the story.  Absolutely zero need for that.

He's not emotionless.  That's been firmly established.
 
But, you'll be happy to know that apparently the romance is discontinued in this movie.

Offline jingle.boy

  • I'm so ronery; so sad and ronery
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 45074
  • Gender: Male
  • DTF's resident deceased dictator
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2410 on: December 18, 2015, 09:09:57 AM »
You're correct... I mis-spoke.  Vulcan's aren't emotionLESS, they are just a species that doesn't outwardly express/demonstrate/display any emotion... hence giving off the impression of being emotionless.

Either way, a romance with a human woman was too much of a stretch for me, especially with the scenes (ie, in the elevator after Vulcan had been destroyed) where Uhura is trying to break down his walls.

And WTF on questioning Roddenberry's vision??   :facepalm:  Yeah, that's the way to celebrate 50 years of Star Trek.   ::)
That's a word salad - and take it from me, I know word salad
I fear for the day when something happens on the right that is SO nuts that even Stadler says "That's crazy".
Quote from: Puppies_On_Acid
Remember the mark of a great vocalist is if TAC hates them with a special passion

Offline hefdaddy42

  • Et in Arcadia Ego
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 53569
  • Gender: Male
  • Postwhore Emeritus
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2411 on: December 18, 2015, 09:59:30 AM »
Yeah what the fuck ?

I just want a bad guy wanting revenge again.


I don't want anything new for a change...
Yes, because that is clearly what I said.
Hef is right on all things. Except for when I disagree with him. In which case he's probably still right.

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30843
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2412 on: December 18, 2015, 11:09:24 AM »
I'm kind of torn on questioning Roddenberry's vision. I've said all along that the guy was a fucking menace. His vision of this superior, enlightened humanity was the fatal flaw of TNG, in my opinion. However, it sounds like they're tackling a different aspect of it which A: doesn't need tackling, and B: doesn't deserve to be tackled by these people. Moreover, it really wasn't a problem at all in the TOS era. Not really sure what to make of all of this.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline JayOctavarium

  • I used to be a whorejerk
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 10056
  • Gender: Male
  • But then I took a Hef to the knee...
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2413 on: January 16, 2016, 09:44:15 PM »
Just watched TOS. SOooo much cheese.

Now working through TNG.

So much hate for Yar...
I just don't understand what they were trying to achieve with any part of the song, either individually or as a whole. You know what? It's the Platypus of Dream Theater songs. That bill doesn't go with that tail, or that strange little furry body, or those webbed feet, and oh god why does it have venomous spurs!? And then you find out it lays eggs too. The difference is that the Platypus is somehow functional despite being a crazy mishmash or leftover animal pieces

-BlobVanDam on "Scarred"

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #2414 on: January 16, 2016, 09:57:10 PM »
Just watched TOS. SOooo much cheese.

Now working through TNG.

So much hate for Yar...

I see we feel the same here. :lol I hated Yar so damn much.
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.