But that doesn't answer the question. What is the difference between Christian evidence and historical evidence and in what way are you applying them? to what object? I'm very curious to know of this parameter you have set.
There is no clear-cut line between "religious evidence" and "historical evidence", if that's what you are asking.
But, there is the act of prioritizing evidence by "believability".
As an example, and in order to not use Christianity (because I have the impression people here are way too involved in Christianity to make a fair assessment of its historical validity), let's use
Heaven's Gate.
If you read any of their self-produced literature, it is stated with absolute conviction and certainty that a spaceship was hiding behind Hale-Bopp. Now, there is no evidence from NASA or otherwise that that is the case. And I would think that you too believe with absolute certainty that there was no spaceship, and not only that, but you also view it as a historical certainty.
What was the problem? The problem was that the literature was written by people for whom those "facts" were beyond question. Not only that, the literature was written to recruit more people.
Now tell me how that is different from Christian literature.
rumborak