I have always been a defensive low-scoring, type staff that is grit-and-grind. The cards to create those teams are not just high tier
2K21 MT cards. It's been tougher over the years since, frankly, when 2K releases cards they just appear to be a league greater than month old cards even if they have similar badges / complete overall. However, other than that MyTEAM is more than just"use expensive players like OOP Durant at PG." I mean, do not get me wrong, it is wonderful to have OOP Durant but not for this price as you'd HAVE to spend real life money and get lucky ripping open packs.
A team plan and A fantastic playbook can go along way. One which you ENJOY. Like, I like Curry and other 3 pt players but I'm not going to sit and take 40 3's at NBA 2K even if it'll get me the dub since that quite frankly is SO boring. I have personally taken the approach to put my lockdown defense with my best scorers coming off the seat. Yeah I still have trouble when I run into 3-5MM + MT teams being run by the teams BUT I will ALWAYS compete with them. My purpose is, you and I concur, be your own man.
My favorite part about myteam is your liberty of creating your own basketball strategy, and the cancerous playerbase greening 3's destroyed it out of half court each possession. If you want do this take that shit I want to play basketball. I wish there was a sensible answer to this. When I first got NBA 2K I hated it to the point at which I uninstalled it because it is so unrealistic. I had to suck it up because there is no other option. They are fuckin around although I genuinely believe EA is capable of creating a basketball game that is competitive.
People today follow what that guy says way too much. People have different play styles and distinct dribble combos they use in 2K and some cards are gonna be a much better match then others. In the day's end, he is just another dude who plays with 2K, he is not all-knowing. Well before there was a clear answer to the question that is better at the 2. Since there were not that numerous elite 2s, therefore he's easily one of the very best option for 2, but1s are stacked with all the y’all of motherfuckers, putting T-Mac there is obviously a waste when he isn't going to be operating the floor in addition to a point guard lebron(since he really do not have the best sigs). However, with how many 2s that are elite there are, now, there is actually no reason why playing him in the two is better.
See and that I get that but it's the men and women who disregard him playing point that I find bothersome. A whole lot of top 10 lists have been made here lately and they all say he's"not a PG". But I mean he's. That the card's main place. For me personally I conduct Kawhi and GOAT Jordan in the 2. So it would not make sense for me to conduct him there. It's not the difference of view I have a problem with, it is the absence of rationale behind getting the difference of opinion
buy mt coins. I know the things are the way that they say they 17, most people do not know. Prolly do not even perform NBA 2K enough to really feel. But I'm one of the ones that need my point shield to have a good btb or cross but he's neither and don't find him as a point guard because I am a cheeseball.