The Ministry of the Lost Souls - an in depth survey

Started by MirrorMask, December 22, 2018, 12:26:18 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

How do you exactly like / dislike the song?

I like the song as a whole
91 (59.9%)
I dislike the song as a whole
16 (10.5%)
I like the main part. I dislike the solo section. I like the outro
25 (16.4%)
I dislike the main part. I like the solo section AND the outro
9 (5.9%)
I like the main part. I dislike the solo section AND the outro
2 (1.3%)
I dislike the main part. I like the solo section. I dislike the outro
7 (4.6%)
I only like the outro, I dislike the rest
2 (1.3%)

Total Members Voted: 152

MirrorMask

So, to not derail further the discussion in the new album thread, and just to discuss what I defined the symbol of all the contrasting opinions on DT, what's your exact opinion of The Ministry of Lost Souls? the poll options say it all, tell us in detail what's your opinion on the song!

I also pick up this from the other thread:

Quote from: Darkstarshades on December 21, 2018, 10:31:59 PM
Sometimes I wonder if the instrumental section to TMOLS was written because the band didn't want to have another ballad in the album so close to Repentance. (Edit: It seems Repentance was written last, but maybe it was already considered? Whathever just a thought)

Literally, the instrumental section feels so disconnected to the rest of the song, if you showed it to someone who hasn't heard the song, there's no way that person would've known it was actually a balladesque song in disguise.

The song up until the instrumental begins is roughly 6:30 minutes, way more than most ballads, and in this time it grows up pretty greatly up to its own climax, you could have a radio edit and cut it right there and it would have been a full song to me.

I don't know if it was done to balance more the album, but you hit the nail on the head for me about the issue with the song - a ballad that grows and grows in intensity, and climaxes at the "Do you remember me this time, even in death we gave you life"... there could have been there a more melodic solo and the ending reprise but no, there "had" to be a solo section that completely derails the song coming back to it only 5 minute later.

BTW, I made a not exactly radio edit, it's 8:30 minutes long, and it flows just fine for me completely removing the solo section.

SeRoX

I thought I dislike the song as a whole and even think this song could be the most boring song DT has ever created. But when you put it like that I think I like the solo section.  As a whole, still boring.

erciccio

I only like The outro but the option is not there.. :xbones

MirrorMask

Quote from: erciccio on December 22, 2018, 12:59:17 AM
I only like The outro but the option is not there.. :xbones

Fixed it just for you in true Christmas spirit  :yarr

JiM-Xtreme

I like all of the individual parts, but to be totally honest if there is one DT song that outstays its welcome it's this one. It just doesn't do enough to justify its nearly 15 minute length for me.

Still, I picked the first option  ;D

AboutToCrash

After listening again I can say that I enjoy it for the most part.. some sections overstay their welcome and the instrumental break is a bit out of place but not overly detracting. 10-12 minutes would've been perfect, I may actually try and cut a shorter version of it

Ruba

Well. As a whole I think it is a little bit too long, but there is nothing about it I actually dislike.

krands85

I love the whole song, it's a top 20 DT track for me. I really enjoy the contrast between the different parts of the song. The instrumental section is my favourite part, though that's not a particularly surprising thing for me ;D
Whoaaaahh, ohhh, ohhhhh. Whoaaaahh, ohhhhh, ohhhhhh. Waaah, ahhh, haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaowwwwww

Another_Won

Funny thing is that for a while after getting the album I didn't realize the solo was so great and skipped the song because I thought it was just a balad.  It was probably months later that it clicked with me and now I never skip it.

I really like the solo section, one of my favorites.  I do agree that it doesn't seem to fit, but I find that to be the case with alot of their music.  It's one of the primary reasons I like DT.  Their songs aren't boring because of this.  Once you get to know these type of songs they blend a bit better. I actually think now that the transition is just fine.

The outro blends so well into ITPoE.  If I'm just listening to TMotLS I have a hard time NOT letting it go to the next track.

If the rest of the song was a track on it's own, then I wouldn't like it much.  But that's not the point.  It is part of the song!  I can actually get through the song up to the solo section because I know it's coming.  I can think of quite a few songs (not just DT) that I like simply because of a section of it.  There is something to be said for letting the song build and set a mood.  Some of the hardest sections of music are preceded by slow passages and that gives the heavy part more impact.


Pax

I like the main part and solo, but not the outro, why is that option unavailable

Evermind

One of the best DT songs, I like everything in it.
Quote from: Train of Naught on May 28, 2020, 10:57:25 PMThis first band is Soen very cool swingy jazz fusion kinda stuff.

Mladen

It's perfect as it is.

Touching. Exciting. Complex.

Podaar


KevShmev

Good song overall, but one I rarely listen to.  It has some amazing moments, but it is so long and drags so much that it feels like work to get through the whole thing.

The Walrus

I don't revisit this song as much as I'd like to, but these days, I love it. I think it's one of the best songs on Systematic Chaos, possibly my favorite (as of 2018). It's aged much better than the rest of the album to me, and although I didn't enjoy it much early on, it was definitely a grower. I even enjoy the shreddy instrumental part now.


MirrorMask

I'm glad and positively surprised that the vast majority said that they like the song, I figured from reading comments here and there that it was much more disliked!

I went and relistened to it yesterday, it's such a somber and melanchonic ballad. The beginning is grandiose, and works well in compilations (for example try to play As I Am and have the ending of the song going directly into this), James sings very well the verses and we have a little nice touch from JP doing backing vocals (We know Jordan can sing as well, I doubt it but I'd love for the new album if there's a mini Jordan backup vocal spot just like JP does in this song), and then the chorus is so haunting and mesmerizing.

The post chorus is the climax of the song in a sense - it continues from the buildup of the chorus, and then reaches that beautiful "Do you remember me this time, even in death I gave you life" part... chilling! then of course comes the (in?)famous long solo section, the reprise at the end is nice because of that little moment of only piano and vocals before kicking back in with the final chorus and then going into the long and melodic solo.

Brilliant, brilliant stuff, and it's a nice contrast to all the heavier, "in your face" moments of Systematic Chaos such as Constant Motion and The Dark Eternal Night.

DTA

I like it for the most part, but I wish they had taken a different approach for the middle of the song. It would've been nice to have an instrumental passage that retains the mood of the first half of the song. That would have been quite a different approach for them and made this song stand out a bit more. It's basically Sacrificed Sons over again and neither are very memorable because of their bridge sections imo. Still, it's one of two songs from SC I haven't seen live so I wouldn't mind it in a setlist for that reason.

Darkstarshades

I enjoy it too, never said it was bad
But there indeed appears to be an agreement of the song overstaying, and the reason for that is the theory that I still have: the pacing. It isn't a bad song by any means and the instrumental isn't bad, I just insist that at least for me, it feels disconnected.

MirrorMask

Quote from: DTA on December 23, 2018, 09:56:27 AM
I like it for the most part, but I wish they had taken a different approach for the middle of the song. It would've been nice to have an instrumental passage that retains the mood of the first half of the song. That would have been quite a different approach for them and made this song stand out a bit more. It's basically Sacrificed Sons over again and neither are very memorable because of their bridge sections imo.

It was a problem of those times...see also Endless Sacrifice, "We're telling you about the struggled of a long distance relationship, it weights heavy on both HEY HOW ABOUT A CIRCUS BREAK AND WE GET BACK TO THE COUPLE IN 5 MINUTES?"... that song, the two you mentioned, go completely out of the song and get back to it only 5 minutes later.

This is an issue for example I don't have with Metropolis - I'm sure many will disagree, but I think that as long as it is, the solo section of Metropolis stays in tune with the song and never goes off the rails. Or Final Tragedy's ending, which does not seem a different song than what came after. Luckily they corrected this in later album, the long passages are still there but they don't feel like a jam copied and pasted into the song.

Darkstarshades

The extensive middle instrumental section is a huge problem when trying to show someone that song, I'm usually like "yes this is a song about distant relationships" and the person hears it, says it's cool, but then the instrumental kicks in and 3 minutes later it's like "why is it taking so long?"

But still, I don't have the issue I have with TMOLS when hearing Endless or Sacrificed sons, but I get the main point.

Mladen

Whatever the instrumental section tries to symbolize and however you interpret it, I think it can be argued that it's introduced much more elegantly and the flow is significantly smoother in comparison to Sacrificed songs or Endless sacrifice . It also contains some truly memorable solos and unisons as well.

TAC

Quote from: Mladen on December 23, 2018, 12:23:56 PM
Whatever the instrumental section tries to symbolize and however you interpret it, I think it can be argued that it's introduced much more elegantly and the flow is significantly smoother in comparison to Sacrificed songs or Endless sacrifice . It also contains some truly memorable solos and unisons as well.

I agree, M.

I love the song, and I find it very well done. My only gripe is that the ending drags a bit. But that's a small beef.
Quote from: wkiml on June 08, 2012, 09:06:35 AMwould have thought the same thing but seeing the OP was TAC i immediately thought Maiden or DT related
Quote from: Stadler on February 08, 2025, 12:49:43 PMI wouldn't argue this.

The Presence of Frenemies

I love the whole thing except for the part between when JLB cuts out and the main JP solo (the palm-muted riffs and keyboard stuff, basically). That doesn't do anything for me. The solo->unison->back to vocals part is great though, and I love the vocal sections & outro. One of my favorite DT songs in spite of the parts I don't like.

PetFish

My only gripe is how it starts with an volume-to-11 ear smash.  I really don't like any songs that start this way but this one hits way harder for some reason.

My own edit has the first 1:02 removed completely so it starts gently and then builds up.

Kyo

Quote from: PetFish on December 23, 2018, 08:41:56 PM
My only gripe is how it starts with an volume-to-11 ear smash.  I really don't like any songs that start this way but this one hits way harder for some reason.

Yeah, it's annoying on the CD. Not a problem with the HD Tracks master!

Mladen

It kind of hits you right over the head the second Prophets of war ends. I always thought that was kind of cool.

MirrorMask

Quote from: Mladen on December 24, 2018, 03:01:56 AM
It kind of hits you right over the head the second Prophets of war ends. I always thought that was kind of cool.

Of course it's cool! as I said try to have As I Am right before this song, see how cool it plays out  :coolio

Destiny Of Chaos

This song, along with its album cohort In The Presence of Enemies immediately found a spot on my all time DT top 10 list and will probably always be there. Sure the instrumental piece doesn't need to be there, but it is awesome, and is quintessential just like Sacrificed Sons, Endless Sacrifice and Metropolis.   

Ben_Jamin

Quote from: MirrorMask on December 24, 2018, 03:20:10 AM
Quote from: Mladen on December 24, 2018, 03:01:56 AM
It kind of hits you right over the head the second Prophets of war ends. I always thought that was kind of cool.

Of course it's cool! as I said try to have As I Am right before this song, see how cool it plays out  :coolio

Its sounds awesome played after About To Crash(Reprise) as well.

JayOctavarium

I love every aspect of this song. Probably top 20 for me. I'd be tickled pink if I ever got to see it live.

Peter Mc

Always liked this song, especially the outro solo. The instrumental section is awesome but is totally self-indulgent and unnecessary to anyone who isn't a fan of prog self indulgence. Luckily most DT fans are so it's cool but if you played the song to anyone else they would literally be like wtf is the point of this?

pg1067


jammindude

Just listening to this for the first time in probably 5 or 6 years.   

First off, it's much better than I remember, and is now solidly on my extremely short list of "songs that just barely redeem SC"

Second, I didn't find the instrumental section out of place at all.  I almost had to replay it just so I could try and figure out what everyone was talking about.   But it feels to me like around the 6 min mark, the energy starts ramping up, making the transition into the instrumental section a totally natural progression. 

Pretty cool tune.   Still hate PoW and the second half of ITPOE.    :angel:

Phoenix87x

Just listened to it for the first time in over 9 years. That kind of says it all right there. But anyway, I don't dislike it. I don't love it, but just like it.

There's better songs on SC and there are worse songs. Ministry falls somewhere in the middle for me.