News:

The staff at DTF wish to remind you all that a firm grasp of the rules of Yahtzee can save your life and the lives of your loved ones.  Be safe out there.

Main Menu

DT Music Theory Thread

Started by JonnyM93, August 02, 2013, 09:38:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mosh

It alternates between 4/4 and 5/4.

The Boomr

Just listened on YouTube. The chorus (at least, in its soft form at the beginning, didn't listen to the later ones) is:

4/4
5/4
4/4
5/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4

EDIT: Myung'd!

Mosh

Surrounded has a similar thing, it's in 9/4 mostly but counted as 4+5 or 5+4. There's a video of Portnoy explaining it even.

theseoafs

Surrounded is NOT in 9/4. It alternates between 4/4 and 5/4.

The Boomr

I would almost wanna say it's grouped as 4/8 and 5/8, at that tempo. Does anyone know what it says in the tab book?

Laich21DT

Can someone give an analysis of The Enemy Inside? Time signature, key, whatever.

The Boomr

Gar. I would love to analyze the time changes but I can't promise anything because when I get home I'm going to be exhausted, both today and tomorrow, after 10 hour work days. And this weekend I am busy almost the whole time

Lucidity

I'm pretty sure Surrounded is 9/4.

Deve

#78
Quote from: Laich21DT on August 07, 2013, 04:21:17 PM
Can someone give an analysis of The Enemy Inside? Time signature, key, whatever.

My Time Signature analysis:

From the beginning to 0:40, it's all 4/4

From 0:40-0:54, it goes (4/4, 2/4, 3/16, 9/8, 7/8)x2, 4/4

0:54-2:14 is all 4/4

The instrumental break after chorus 1 (2:14-2:32), it goes 4/4, 5/4, 4/4x3, 5/4, 4/4, 6/4, 4/4x2

2:32-4:15 is all 4/4


Solo section:

4:15-4:30 is the same as the instrumental break after chorus 1 without the two bars of 4 at the end (so 4/4, 5/4, 4/4x3, 5/4, 4/4, 6/4)

4:30-4:43 is 5/4x2, 4/4x5 (This could be different, it depends on how you feel it in your head. Specifically referring to the beat pattern @ 4:36-4:41 is 123,123,12; could be felt differently than 4/4)

4:43-4:54 is 2/4, 3/16, 3/4, 2/4, 3/16, 4/4, 2/4, 3/16, 3/4, 4/4x2

4:54-5:12 is (4/4, 2/4, 3/16, 9/8, 7/8)x2, 4/4x3 (same as 0:40-0:54)

5:12-6:07 is all 4/4

6:08-6:10 (the last two bars of the song) are 3/4, 3/16, 4/4


Obviously none of this is written in stone, but this is how I interpreted it. There could be mistakes as well, of course. Anyways, that was quite the endeavor. Lots of fun though :D


Edit: Changed the 10/8's to 5/4's as per Mosh's correction.

theseoafs

Quote from: Lucidity on August 07, 2013, 05:48:13 PM
I'm pretty sure Surrounded is 9/4.

Long story short, a "9" at the top of the time signature implies compound time ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compound_time#Compound_meter ), and Surrounded is simply not in compound meter, since there aren't three beats subdivided into three beats each.  The alternating time signatures are more accurate.

Mosh

Quote from: theseoafs on August 07, 2013, 04:07:15 PM
Surrounded is NOT in 9/4. It alternates between 4/4 and 5/4.
Mike Portnoy disagrees. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2u1-GiDHyQ A compound meter is implied, but that doesn't mean its set in stone.

I've seen it written in 9/8 too, though that's incorrect and actually kinda hard to read.

As for Enemy Inside, just from listening, I'm gonna guess that the key is B. I probably won't bother learning that one until the book comes out, so don't hold your breath on an analysis from me. :P

Edit: Without checking, Deve seems right for the most part. But the 10/8s should be 5/4.

Deve

#81
Quote from: Mosh on August 07, 2013, 06:46:14 PM
Quote from: theseoafs on August 07, 2013, 04:07:15 PM
Surrounded is NOT in 9/4. It alternates between 4/4 and 5/4.
Mike Portnoy disagrees. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2u1-GiDHyQ A compound meter is implied, but that doesn't mean its set in stone.

I've seen it written in 9/8 too, though that's incorrect and actually kinda hard to read.

As for Enemy Inside, just from listening, I'm gonna guess that the key is B. I probably won't bother learning that one until the book comes out, so don't hold your breath on an analysis from me. :P

Edit: Without checking, Deve seems right for the most part. But the 10/8s should be 5/4.

For Surrounded, it really feels like it's alternating between 4/4 and 5/4. Especially at around 1:50 where everything kicks in, the beats that the bass is accenting are 1+3 in the bar of 4/4, which heavily implies 4/4. In the bar of 5/4 after that, the bass accents the 1 and 2, and then kicks in again on the and of 4, the 5, and the and of 5. Since it accents the first two beats, it really feels like a 2+3 rhythm, indicating 5/4.

Edit: did you watch the whole video you linked? He says 9/4 @ around 17 seconds, but then literally 3 seconds later he says "but what it really is is alternating bars of 4/4 and 5/4"

Ah, you're right! I knew that felt weird for some reason. Will change it now.

Mosh

Sure, but most of the time 7/4 sounds like it's alternating between 3 and 4. That's just how bigger meters work.

10/8 isn't technically wrong, but it just makes more sense to count as 5.

Deve

Quote from: Mosh on August 07, 2013, 07:06:49 PM
Sure, but most of the time 7/4 sounds like it's alternating between 3 and 4. That's just how bigger meters work.

10/8 isn't technically wrong, but it just makes more sense to count as 5.

But with 9/4, there are 3 beats in a measure, and those three beats contain 3 pulses each (as theseoafs said). You really can't feel Surrounded like that, given the accent placement within the beats in the song. 7/4 is a completely different beast than 9/4, because it's hybrid time rather than compound time. Hybrid time can be felt in many different ways (ex. with 7/4, you can feel it as 3+2+2 or 2+2+3 or 2+3+2, or as you said 3+4 or 4+3), whereas with compound time it's almost always felt in the same way (ex. 9/4 as 3+3+3). It's simply incorrect to say you feel 9/4 as 4+5, it's just not what the time signature means. That's why it's in 4/4+5/4 rather than 9/4.

Mosh

Quote from: Deve on August 07, 2013, 07:20:15 PM
Quote from: Mosh on August 07, 2013, 07:06:49 PM
Sure, but most of the time 7/4 sounds like it's alternating between 3 and 4. That's just how bigger meters work.

10/8 isn't technically wrong, but it just makes more sense to count as 5.

But with 9/4, there are 3 beats in a measure, and those three beats contain 3 pulses each (as theseoafs said). You really can't feel Surrounded like that, given the accent placement within the beats in the song. 7/4 is a completely different beast than 9/4, because it's hybrid time rather than compound time. Hybrid time can be felt in many different ways (ex. with 7/4, you can feel it as 3+2+2 or 2+2+3 or 2+3+2, or as you said 3+4 or 4+3), whereas with compound time it's almost always felt in the same way (ex. 9/4 as 3+3+3). It's simply incorrect to say you feel 9/4 as 4+5, it's just not what the time signature means. That's why it's in 4/4+5/4 rather than 9/4.
I understand what you're saying, but 9/4 doesn't always have to be a compound time signature. It can be used as whatever the composer wants it to be. I've even seen instances of 6/8 not being a compound.

theseoafs

If you're going to be pedantic about your time signatures (which is exactly what this thread is -- being pedantic about time signatures), then you can't really consider Surrounded as being in 9/4, because it's not. 

Deve

Quote from: Mosh on August 07, 2013, 08:20:04 PM
Quote from: Deve on August 07, 2013, 07:20:15 PM
Quote from: Mosh on August 07, 2013, 07:06:49 PM
Sure, but most of the time 7/4 sounds like it's alternating between 3 and 4. That's just how bigger meters work.

10/8 isn't technically wrong, but it just makes more sense to count as 5.

But with 9/4, there are 3 beats in a measure, and those three beats contain 3 pulses each (as theseoafs said). You really can't feel Surrounded like that, given the accent placement within the beats in the song. 7/4 is a completely different beast than 9/4, because it's hybrid time rather than compound time. Hybrid time can be felt in many different ways (ex. with 7/4, you can feel it as 3+2+2 or 2+2+3 or 2+3+2, or as you said 3+4 or 4+3), whereas with compound time it's almost always felt in the same way (ex. 9/4 as 3+3+3). It's simply incorrect to say you feel 9/4 as 4+5, it's just not what the time signature means. That's why it's in 4/4+5/4 rather than 9/4.
I understand what you're saying, but 9/4 doesn't always have to be a compound time signature. It can be used as whatever the composer wants it to be. I've even seen instances of 6/8 not being a compound.

Yeah for sure, but just because the composer uses it like that doesn't mean he/she is using it correctly. It's like if I said "Dream Theater is great. There all so musically talented". You would understand the statement and what I mean by it, but I'm saying it in an incorrect way because I've spelled "they're" wrong.

Anyways, it's not that huge of a deal. My classical background really makes me a stickler for proper musical notation :lol

Mosh

Quote from: Deve on August 07, 2013, 08:39:54 PM
Quote from: Mosh on August 07, 2013, 08:20:04 PM
Quote from: Deve on August 07, 2013, 07:20:15 PM
Quote from: Mosh on August 07, 2013, 07:06:49 PM
Sure, but most of the time 7/4 sounds like it's alternating between 3 and 4. That's just how bigger meters work.

10/8 isn't technically wrong, but it just makes more sense to count as 5.

But with 9/4, there are 3 beats in a measure, and those three beats contain 3 pulses each (as theseoafs said). You really can't feel Surrounded like that, given the accent placement within the beats in the song. 7/4 is a completely different beast than 9/4, because it's hybrid time rather than compound time. Hybrid time can be felt in many different ways (ex. with 7/4, you can feel it as 3+2+2 or 2+2+3 or 2+3+2, or as you said 3+4 or 4+3), whereas with compound time it's almost always felt in the same way (ex. 9/4 as 3+3+3). It's simply incorrect to say you feel 9/4 as 4+5, it's just not what the time signature means. That's why it's in 4/4+5/4 rather than 9/4.
I understand what you're saying, but 9/4 doesn't always have to be a compound time signature. It can be used as whatever the composer wants it to be. I've even seen instances of 6/8 not being a compound.

Yeah for sure, but just because the composer uses it like that doesn't mean he/she is using it correctly. It's like if I said "Dream Theater is great. There all so musically talented". You would understand the statement and what I mean by it, but I'm saying it in an incorrect way because I've spelled "they're" wrong.
I don't think that's the same, but we've both made our points.

One thing I've always wanted to do is compile a list of DT songs that either stay in the same meter for the entire song or don't have any odd time signatures. I imagine it would be a pretty small list, maybe 1-3 from every album.

FourthHorseman

Quote from: Mosh on August 07, 2013, 08:49:13 PM
Quote from: Deve on August 07, 2013, 08:39:54 PM
Quote from: Mosh on August 07, 2013, 08:20:04 PM
Quote from: Deve on August 07, 2013, 07:20:15 PM
Quote from: Mosh on August 07, 2013, 07:06:49 PM
Sure, but most of the time 7/4 sounds like it's alternating between 3 and 4. That's just how bigger meters work.

10/8 isn't technically wrong, but it just makes more sense to count as 5.

But with 9/4, there are 3 beats in a measure, and those three beats contain 3 pulses each (as theseoafs said). You really can't feel Surrounded like that, given the accent placement within the beats in the song. 7/4 is a completely different beast than 9/4, because it's hybrid time rather than compound time. Hybrid time can be felt in many different ways (ex. with 7/4, you can feel it as 3+2+2 or 2+2+3 or 2+3+2, or as you said 3+4 or 4+3), whereas with compound time it's almost always felt in the same way (ex. 9/4 as 3+3+3). It's simply incorrect to say you feel 9/4 as 4+5, it's just not what the time signature means. That's why it's in 4/4+5/4 rather than 9/4.
I understand what you're saying, but 9/4 doesn't always have to be a compound time signature. It can be used as whatever the composer wants it to be. I've even seen instances of 6/8 not being a compound.

Yeah for sure, but just because the composer uses it like that doesn't mean he/she is using it correctly. It's like if I said "Dream Theater is great. There all so musically talented". You would understand the statement and what I mean by it, but I'm saying it in an incorrect way because I've spelled "they're" wrong.
I don't think that's the same, but we've both made our points.

One thing I've always wanted to do is compile a list of DT songs that either stay in the same meter for the entire song or don't have any odd time signatures. I imagine it would be a pretty small list, maybe 1-3 from every album.

Probably less than that! The Silent Man, which is probably the most simple song on Awake, has one bar of 2/4  :lol

Mosh

Isn't all of Lifting Shadows in 4? I've only played it a few times, so I'm not sure.

FourthHorseman

Mostly, except for when the really heavy part comes in, might be some 4/4 with an "extra" bar of 2 or 3, but I'm not exactly sure.

theseoafs

Confirmed: no song on Awake is the same time signature all the way through.  The heavy section of Lifting Shadows is not in 4/4.

Laich21DT

Thanks to Deve for the info in TEI.

Quote from: Mosh on August 07, 2013, 08:49:13 PMOne thing I've always wanted to do is compile a list of DT songs that either stay in the same meter for the entire song or don't have any odd time signatures. I imagine it would be a pretty small list, maybe 1-3 from every album.

According to my FII tab book, You Not Me, Hollow Years, Take Away My Pain, and Anna Lee are all in 4/4, straight through.

The Boomr

I agree with the alternating time signatures, in Surrounded, for sure. That sure is a fast beat to be counting as the quarter note though, I would always think of it as the 8th, so 4/8+5/8 instead of 4/4+5/4 *shrug* I dunno. I guess it's a little too fast for my liking of quarter notes, but also a little too slow for my liking of eighth notes :lol

showdonttell

Quote from: Mosh on August 07, 2013, 06:46:14 PM
Quote from: theseoafs on August 07, 2013, 04:07:15 PM
Surrounded is NOT in 9/4. It alternates between 4/4 and 5/4.
Mike Portnoy disagrees. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2u1-GiDHyQ A compound meter is implied, but that doesn't mean its set in stone.
I agree with Mosh. Though it is correct to say that a compound metre such as 9/4 would traditionally imply three sets of three pulses (3+3+3), nothing is saying we can't break that rule and phrase things differently (4+4+1). It's all how you phrase it.

Consider a common rhythm in 4/4: say we have a bar of two dotted quarter notes and a regular quarter note. Because of the implied accents, you could say that we should phrase it as two bars of 3/8 and a bar of 2/8. Or perhaps a bar of 6/8 and a bar of 1/4. But it is simply easier to put it into a 4/4 metre. Sure, you group the notes in your head as 3+3+2, but organizing it into 4/4 might be easier. Plus you're not constantly writing out changing metres when it can be simplified. The same is true for "Surrounded" -- in stead of constantly switching between 4/4 and 5/4 for that repeating rhythmic phrase, just writing 9/4 and combining the phrase into one bar is more effective and easier to read.

Cruithne

Quote from: theseoafs on August 07, 2013, 06:32:25 PM
Long story short, a "9" at the top of the time signature implies compound time ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compound_time#Compound_meter )

The rule is that a multiple of 3 over an 8 means compound time.

9/4 isn't compound time. 9/8 is.

The drummer of my last band used to drive me nuts by insisting that 6/8 songs were in 3! Grr.

The Boomr

Quote from: showdonttell on August 08, 2013, 08:08:46 AM
Quote from: Mosh on August 07, 2013, 06:46:14 PM
Quote from: theseoafs on August 07, 2013, 04:07:15 PM
Surrounded is NOT in 9/4. It alternates between 4/4 and 5/4.
Mike Portnoy disagrees. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2u1-GiDHyQ A compound meter is implied, but that doesn't mean its set in stone.
I agree with Mosh. Though it is correct to say that a compound metre such as 9/4 would traditionally imply three sets of three pulses (3+3+3), nothing is saying we can't break that rule and phrase things differently (4+4+1). It's all how you phrase it.

Consider a common rhythm in 4/4: say we have a bar of two dotted quarter notes and a regular quarter note. Because of the implied accents, you could say that we should phrase it as two bars of 3/8 and a bar of 2/8. Or perhaps a bar of 6/8 and a bar of 1/4. But it is simply easier to put it into a 4/4 metre. Sure, you group the notes in your head as 3+3+2, but organizing it into 4/4 might be easier. Plus you're not constantly writing out changing metres when it can be simplified. The same is true for "Surrounded" -- in stead of constantly switching between 4/4 and 5/4 for that repeating rhythmic phrase, just writing 9/4 and combining the phrase into one bar is more effective and easier to read.

Actually the most appropriate way to write a rhythm of 3+3+2 is in 8/8 :D That way the performer reading it knows it's going to consistently subdivide at the eighth note level in groupings other than 2+2+2+2. As for Surrounded, that's partially why I would say 9/8 vs 9/4, so that you don't have a huge bar with 9 quarter notes in it. That gets to be a hassle sometimes. Also, if you were to write it as alternating measures, it's not too uncommon to write that with both time sigs next to each other with a slash, indicating that it switches every bar. Then you don't have to write it in every single bar. Or you can do the 9/4 or 9/8, and have dotted lines down the dividing point in the bar, to make it clearer and not just one long bar.

theseoafs

Quote from: Cruithne on August 08, 2013, 08:09:50 AM
Quote from: theseoafs on August 07, 2013, 06:32:25 PM
Long story short, a "9" at the top of the time signature implies compound time ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compound_time#Compound_meter )

The rule is that a multiple of 3 over an 8 means compound time.

9/4 isn't compound time. 9/8 is.

The drummer of my last band used to drive me nuts by insisting that 6/8 songs were in 3! Grr.

No, there is nothing special about the eighth note that makes 9/8 compound time and 9/4 simple time.

https://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/understanding-simple-and-compound-time-signatures.navId-380613.html
https://www.musictheory.net/lessons/15

Also have a look at chapter 2 of this public domain music theory textbook:  https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B6gHBiL6SDOKcjhnQTNYdGJUNFE&usp=sharing

The Boomr

Hey, guys. However much we are pedants in this thread...

:heart this thread :)

Elite

Surrounded is for the most part actually written in 4/4. The parts people get fessed up about here are in 9/8, because, well, that's how I perceive them, as a 4/4 bar with an extra eighth stacked at the end. If you were to write the whole song in alternating time signatures of 4/4 and 5/4, then all measures that do not conform to this would have to be (in order not to have tempo changes) in 8/4 or, even more hilariously, split up into two measures of 4/4, which they definitely are not, since the chord symbols change every measure.

So, Surrounded is for the most part in 4/4, with some parts in 9/8.
Quote from: Lolzeez on November 18, 2013, 01:23:32 PMHey dude slow the fuck down so we can finish together at the same time.  :biggrin:
Quote from: home on May 09, 2017, 04:05:10 PMSqu
scRa are the resultaten of sound nog bring propey

The Boomr

Quote from: Elite on August 08, 2013, 09:59:28 AM
Surrounded is for the most part actually written in 4/4. The parts people get fessed up about here are in 9/8, because, well, that's how I perceive them, as a 4/4 bar with an extra eighth stacked at the end. If you were to write the whole song in alternating time signatures of 4/4 and 5/4, then all measures that do not conform to this would have to be (in order not to have tempo changes) in 8/4 or, even more hilariously, split up into two measures of 4/4, which they definitely are not, since the chord symbols change every measure.

So, Surrounded is for the most part in 4/4, with some parts in 9/8.

Thank you for explaining that in a way that makes it clear why this section we've talked about is 9/8, not 9/4! :)

Lucien

Random note: my favorite part of TCoT is the delicious part where you have 3 measures of 9/8 and 2 measures of 4/4.

The Boomr

Quote from: Lucien on August 08, 2013, 10:03:28 AM
Random note: my favorite part of TCoT is the delicious part where you have 3 measures of 9/8 and 2 measures of 4/4.

Ohhhhh yes, that IS delicious. Except it would be three measures of 9/8 and two measures of 4/8, or 9/4 and 4/4.

Lucien

Quote from: The Boomr on August 08, 2013, 10:11:59 AM
Quote from: Lucien on August 08, 2013, 10:03:28 AM
Random note: my favorite part of TCoT is the delicious part where you have 3 measures of 9/8 and 2 measures of 4/4.

Ohhhhh yes, that IS delicious. Except it would be three measures of 9/8 and two measures of 4/8, or 9/4 and 4/4.

That is correct.

9/8 then 4/8 makes sense.

The Boomr

Quote from: Lucien on August 08, 2013, 10:13:34 AM
Quote from: The Boomr on August 08, 2013, 10:11:59 AM
Quote from: Lucien on August 08, 2013, 10:03:28 AM
Random note: my favorite part of TCoT is the delicious part where you have 3 measures of 9/8 and 2 measures of 4/4.

Ohhhhh yes, that IS delicious. Except it would be three measures of 9/8 and two measures of 4/8, or 9/4 and 4/4.

That is correct.

9/8 then 4/8 makes sense.

Yeah the tempo is quick enough for /8 to be a much better choice than /4, imo.

When I first read your comment I thought you said That is incorrect. And I was really confused because you then immediately said one of my assertions was correct. But then I reread it and I was like :facepalm: hahaha!