Pain of Salvation thread, v.2 (merged)

Started by ariich, August 23, 2010, 05:41:11 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

abydos

So yeah, more naked, bloody Gildenlow. Meh. Is that his wife, though?

Lynxo

No, it's a model. Which makes it even more disturbing if you ask me.

abydos

You guys are surprisingly easy to disturb.

The Degenerate

Gildenlöw's ass!

*cross off another thing on my "things to see before I die" list*

pogoowner

I did not enjoy that. But I didn't expect to.

sonatafanica

Quote from: abydos on March 30, 2011, 06:48:54 AM
So yeah, more naked, bloody Gildenlow.

Um, is this not the first of it?

ariich

Dammit, the vid is gone before I had a chance to see it.

Wtf, can't they just upload it to their website?

Quote from: Buddyhunter1 on May 10, 2023, 05:59:19 PMAriich is a freak, or somehow has more hours in the day than everyone else.
Quote from: TAC on December 21, 2023, 06:05:15 AMI be am boner inducing.

ClairvoyantCat

Quote from: Lynxo on March 30, 2011, 07:27:01 AM
No, it's a model. Which makes it even more disturbing if you ask me.


Well, not really.  So, because it's an attractive female it's more disturbing?  Of course it's not Daniel's wife.... she's an... er... wife.  As opposed to this actor who is used to taking her clothes off.  I find it much less disturbing. 




Also, Daniel made some Facebook comment about how his wife was always in complete understanding of his artistic vision, vaguely saying that she wouldn't be bothered by it. 



Anyway, there it goes.  It's gone.  Shame, too, because I really want to see it again.  I hope someone captured it and it surfaces up... this is really the worst financial I've ever seen in my life if they invest all of that time and money into a video for it to only be up for a few hours.  What the hell is the point. 

jonny108

#638
I managed to download it before it got taken down.  Don't know the laws and stuff on this but would I be able to host this somewhere for people to watch without getting in trouble etc.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGt1uBQv4Rc Censored version.

NecessaryPain

^Please do so. I would like to see the uncensored version.


faemir

#640
Warning.

Adami

It was very well made, but I didn't really care for the concept.
www. fanticide.bandcamp . com

Lynxo

#642
Warning.

shadowfex

Quote from: Adami on March 30, 2011, 04:48:44 PM
It was very well made, but I didn't really care for the concept.

I'd agree with that. I'm not really sure what was happening to be an honest, I Just saw a lot of boobs, blood and Gildenlow's ass. All of which were pretty awesome.

wolfking


shadowfex


Nick

1. Posting of media containing or links to pornography and explicit nudity is not allowed. This includes site names, broken URLS, and "hints" to the site names.

Lynxo and faemir, consider this a warning.

TheVoxyn


wolfking

Quote from: Nick on March 31, 2011, 11:56:59 AM
1. Posting of media containing or links to pornography and explicit nudity is not allowed. This includes site names, broken URLS, and "hints" to the site names.

Lynxo and faemir, consider this a warning.

Really? So a total of about 15 seconds footage of a pair of tits is considered 'explicit nudity' now?

sonatafanica

Tits and fast, non-erotic cuts in low lighting qualifies as pornography these days

didn't ya know

TheVoxyn


sonatafanica

Hey don't blame it on america


Nick probably just turned into an old catholic nun for a minute that's all

wolfking


ariich

Quote from: sonatafanica on March 31, 2011, 01:16:43 PM
Tits and fast, non-erotic cuts in low lighting qualifies as pornography these days

didn't ya know
No it counts as explicit nudity. And always has done here, tits have NEVER been allowed so why would it suddenly change now?

Quote from: Buddyhunter1 on May 10, 2023, 05:59:19 PMAriich is a freak, or somehow has more hours in the day than everyone else.
Quote from: TAC on December 21, 2023, 06:05:15 AMI be am boner inducing.

wolfking

Fair enough, but the point is, is that the guys weren't posting it just to share explicit material, they shared it because it's a new eagerly awaited POS video that we all wanted to see.  But granted, if it breaches the rules, it breaches the rules, end of story.

sonatafanica

Artistic nudity counts in that?

Does that extend to, like, photos of Veus de Milo?


I mean, tits are tits, right

ariich

Quote from: wolfking on March 31, 2011, 01:38:48 PM
Fair enough, but the point is, is that the guys weren't posting it just to share explicit material, they shared it because it's a new eagerly awaited POS video that we all wanted to see.
Indeed, which is why they weren't given a temp ban and were only warned.

QuoteBut granted, if it breaches the rules, it breaches the rules, end of story.
Bingo.


Quote from: Buddyhunter1 on May 10, 2023, 05:59:19 PMAriich is a freak, or somehow has more hours in the day than everyone else.
Quote from: TAC on December 21, 2023, 06:05:15 AMI be am boner inducing.

wolfking

Quote from: sonatafanica on March 31, 2011, 01:41:00 PM
Artistic nudity counts in that?

Does that extend to, like, photos of Veus de Milo?


I mean, tits are tits, right

And really, who doesn't want to see tits right?

wolfking

Quote from: ariich on March 31, 2011, 01:43:01 PM
Quote from: wolfking on March 31, 2011, 01:38:48 PM
Fair enough, but the point is, is that the guys weren't posting it just to share explicit material, they shared it because it's a new eagerly awaited POS video that we all wanted to see.
Indeed, which is why they weren't given a temp ban and were only warned.

QuoteBut granted, if it breaches the rules, it breaches the rules, end of story.
Bingo.

Damn, I'm a smart cookie! :tup

ClairvoyantCat


wolfking


The Degenerate

It's so silly that tits are considered nudity (not on the forum, I mean. Rules are rules, just in general). But yes, who doesn't love them? Even my gay friends do :lol

wolfking

The thing is, it's perfectly okay to see a woman in the skimpiest bikini, but once you see some nipple, it's off limits.

sonatafanica

And this is why censorship (well this isn't true censorship I guess but I'm trying to be a sensationalist here) is so weird because just saying the word "tits" can conjure the image of tits in your mind, so what's the difference between seeing them and hearing the word? Everyone knows what they look like and they're not a throbbing sexual organ so I don't see why people get all huffy about them.

I'm not talking about the mods really because they're just doing what they're supposed to, but I get to be a frustrated teenager for only a few more months.

The Degenerate

oh no not nipples those things everyone has whatever will we do :'(

On topic nipples:


Quote from: sonatafanica on March 31, 2011, 02:04:54 PM
I'm not talking about the mods really because they're just doing what they're supposed to, but I get to be a frustrated teenager for only a few more months.

Yeah, again, I'm not aiming this at the mods, it's just silly in general :lol