Pain of Salvation thread, v.2 (merged)

abydos · March 30, 2011, 06:48:54 AM

So yeah, more naked, bloody Gildenlow. Meh. Is that his wife, though?

Lynxo · March 30, 2011, 07:27:01 AM

No, it's a model. Which makes it even more disturbing if you ask me.

abydos · March 30, 2011, 07:29:16 AM

You guys are surprisingly easy to disturb.

The Degenerate · March 30, 2011, 07:31:34 AM

Gildenlöw's ass!

*cross off another thing on my "things to see before I die" list*

pogoowner · March 30, 2011, 07:57:12 AM

I did not enjoy that. But I didn't expect to.

sonatafanica · March 30, 2011, 10:07:44 AM

Quote from: abydos on March 30, 2011, 06:48:54 AM
So yeah, more naked, bloody Gildenlow.

Um, is this not the first of it?

ariich · March 30, 2011, 01:19:54 PM

Dammit, the vid is gone before I had a chance to see it.

Wtf, can't they just upload it to their website?

ClairvoyantCat · March 30, 2011, 01:23:27 PM

Quote from: Lynxo on March 30, 2011, 07:27:01 AM
No, it's a model. Which makes it even more disturbing if you ask me.

Well, not really. So, because it's an attractive female it's more disturbing? Of course it's not Daniel's wife.... she's an... er... wife. As opposed to this actor who is used to taking her clothes off. I find it much less disturbing.

Also, Daniel made some Facebook comment about how his wife was always in complete understanding of his artistic vision, vaguely saying that she wouldn't be bothered by it.

Anyway, there it goes. It's gone. Shame, too, because I really want to see it again. I hope someone captured it and it surfaces up... this is really the worst financial I've ever seen in my life if they invest all of that time and money into a video for it to only be up for a few hours. What the hell is the point.

jonny108 · March 30, 2011, 01:25:09 PM

I managed to download it before it got taken down. Don't know the laws and stuff on this but would I be able to host this somewhere for people to watch without getting in trouble etc.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGt1uBQv4Rc Censored version.

NecessaryPain · March 30, 2011, 03:57:23 PM

^Please do so. I would like to see the uncensored version.

faemir · March 30, 2011, 04:44:56 PM

Warning.

Adami · March 30, 2011, 04:48:44 PM

It was very well made, but I didn't really care for the concept.

Lynxo · March 31, 2011, 12:48:02 AM

Warning.

shadowfex · March 31, 2011, 02:02:59 AM

Quote from: Adami on March 30, 2011, 04:48:44 PM
It was very well made, but I didn't really care for the concept.

I'd agree with that. I'm not really sure what was happening to be an honest, I Just saw a lot of boobs, blood and Gildenlow's ass. All of which were pretty awesome.

wolfking · March 31, 2011, 02:30:38 AM

Quote from: shadowfex on March 31, 2011, 02:02:59 AM
Gildenlow's ass. All of which were pretty awesome.

shadowfex · March 31, 2011, 02:32:09 AM

Nick · March 31, 2011, 11:56:59 AM

1. Posting of media containing or links to pornography and explicit nudity is not allowed. This includes site names, broken URLS, and "hints" to the site names.

Lynxo and faemir, consider this a warning.

TheVoxyn · March 31, 2011, 11:59:01 AM

wolfking · March 31, 2011, 01:10:11 PM

Quote from: Nick on March 31, 2011, 11:56:59 AM
1. Posting of media containing or links to pornography and explicit nudity is not allowed. This includes site names, broken URLS, and "hints" to the site names.

Lynxo and faemir, consider this a warning.

Really? So a total of about 15 seconds footage of a pair of tits is considered 'explicit nudity' now?

sonatafanica · March 31, 2011, 01:16:43 PM

Tits and fast, non-erotic cuts in low lighting qualifies as pornography these days

didn't ya know

TheVoxyn · March 31, 2011, 01:18:42 PM

America fuck yea

sonatafanica · March 31, 2011, 01:27:04 PM

Hey don't blame it on america

Nick probably just turned into an old catholic nun for a minute that's all

wolfking · March 31, 2011, 01:30:28 PM

ariich · March 31, 2011, 01:31:09 PM

Quote from: sonatafanica on March 31, 2011, 01:16:43 PM
Tits and fast, non-erotic cuts in low lighting qualifies as pornography these days

didn't ya know

No it counts as explicit nudity. And always has done here, tits have NEVER been allowed so why would it suddenly change now?

wolfking · March 31, 2011, 01:38:48 PM

Fair enough, but the point is, is that the guys weren't posting it just to share explicit material, they shared it because it's a new eagerly awaited POS video that we all wanted to see. But granted, if it breaches the rules, it breaches the rules, end of story.

sonatafanica · March 31, 2011, 01:41:00 PM

Artistic nudity counts in that?

Does that extend to, like, photos of Veus de Milo?

I mean, tits are tits, right

ariich · March 31, 2011, 01:43:01 PM

Quote from: wolfking on March 31, 2011, 01:38:48 PM
Fair enough, but the point is, is that the guys weren't posting it just to share explicit material, they shared it because it's a new eagerly awaited POS video that we all wanted to see.

Indeed, which is why they weren't given a temp ban and were only warned.

QuoteBut granted, if it breaches the rules, it breaches the rules, end of story.

Bingo.

wolfking · March 31, 2011, 01:48:24 PM

Quote from: sonatafanica on March 31, 2011, 01:41:00 PM
Artistic nudity counts in that?

Does that extend to, like, photos of Veus de Milo?

I mean, tits are tits, right

And really, who doesn't want to see tits right?

wolfking · March 31, 2011, 01:50:11 PM

Quote from: ariich on March 31, 2011, 01:43:01 PM
Quote from: wolfking on March 31, 2011, 01:38:48 PM
Fair enough, but the point is, is that the guys weren't posting it just to share explicit material, they shared it because it's a new eagerly awaited POS video that we all wanted to see.
Indeed, which is why they weren't given a temp ban and were only warned.

QuoteBut granted, if it breaches the rules, it breaches the rules, end of story.
Bingo.

Damn, I'm a smart cookie!

ClairvoyantCat · March 31, 2011, 01:54:04 PM

I like tits

wolfking · March 31, 2011, 01:56:56 PM

Quote from: dtismajesty on March 31, 2011, 01:54:04 PM
I like tits

I LOVE tits!!!

The Degenerate · March 31, 2011, 01:59:02 PM

It's so silly that tits are considered nudity (not on the forum, I mean. Rules are rules, just in general). But yes, who doesn't love them? Even my gay friends do

wolfking · March 31, 2011, 02:02:14 PM

The thing is, it's perfectly okay to see a woman in the skimpiest bikini, but once you see some nipple, it's off limits.

sonatafanica · March 31, 2011, 02:04:54 PM

And this is why censorship (well this isn't true censorship I guess but I'm trying to be a sensationalist here) is so weird because just saying the word "tits" can conjure the image of tits in your mind, so what's the difference between seeing them and hearing the word? Everyone knows what they look like and they're not a throbbing sexual organ so I don't see why people get all huffy about them.

I'm not talking about the mods really because they're just doing what they're supposed to, but I get to be a frustrated teenager for only a few more months.

The Degenerate · March 31, 2011, 02:06:37 PM

oh no not nipples those things everyone has whatever will we do

On topic nipples:

Quote from: sonatafanica on March 31, 2011, 02:04:54 PM
I'm not talking about the mods really because they're just doing what they're supposed to, but I get to be a frustrated teenager for only a few more months.

Yeah, again, I'm not aiming this at the mods, it's just silly in general

News:

Pain of Salvation thread, v.2 (merged)