News:

Dream Theater Forums:  Still "a thing" since 2007.

Main Menu

quick question about LTE song

Started by pinchylarue, October 10, 2010, 11:55:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pinchylarue

today i bought both of the liquid tension experiment cds and the liquid tension experiment trio cd spontanious combustion, but my favourite song (universal mind part 2) is'nt on any of the 3 cds....

was this a digital only song, or just in the live show?
if not where can i find it

im very addicted to it lol

thanks guys

PINCHYLARUE

Plasmastrike

The copy of "Universal Mind Part 2" I'm assuming is from the "LTE Live 2008" set. It has shows from both L.A. and NYC. Both of which this song was played at.

It's just the latter end of the whole song "Universal Mind." They split it because JR played a piano solo interlude in the middle of the song (which also got its own track)

pinchylarue

gotchya,
i guess thats why i thought it was it's own song im in love with the rudess intro so that explains alot

thanks again

The Letter M

Quote from: pinchylarue on October 10, 2010, 11:55:14 PM
today i bought both of the liquid tension experiment cds and the liquid tension experiment trio cd spontanious combustion, but my favourite song (universal mind part 2) is'nt on any of the 3 cds....

was this a digital only song, or just in the live show?
if not where can i find it

im very addicted to it lol

thanks guys

PINCHYLARUE

I guess you didn't make it all the way through the first album, or at least "Universal Mind" to hear the second half of it yet? :lol

That's alright, but I hope you listen through both of their albums pretty soon! :metal

-Marc.

Dublagent66

The only reason JR played a piano solo at the LA show is because JP's rack went down for about 10 or 15 mins.  Otherwise, UM would've been one track.

hefdaddy42

Asked and answered.  Everything turns out great. 
Quote from: BlobVanDam on December 11, 2014, 08:19:46 PMHef is right on all things. Except for when I disagree with him. In which case he's probably still right.