Well, I'm being reminded of one of my only complaints about the book...
In the seventh chapter you have the line, "Those closest to the band during that era still correctly rate the album as one of their most complete and captivating releases."
While I agree that Images is one of their most complete and captivating releases, I don't believe that such an objective statement should have any place inside the band's biography, even if I agree with it. The quality of Images and Words is subjective, and as such a statement like that should not be etched into stone like this.
This becomes even more of a problem in chapter ten when the book says that, "Burning My Soul and Just Let Me Breathe are also highlights."
My personal opinions aside Dream Theater's fans nearly unanimously agree that Trial of Tears and Lines in the Sand are the two best tracks on the album. I think it would be better to put in phrases like, "Despite their being tracks on the album many fans, along with the band are not fond of, many fans find Lines in the Sand and Trial of Tears to be two of the best tracks the band have ever written."
Far less authority in the statement, while being far more accurate on a measurable (fan reaction) level.
Just something I hoped would be edited out this time around.