Author Topic: Doctor Who  (Read 216650 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Super Dude

  • Hero of Prog
  • DTF.com Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16265
  • Gender: Male
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2205 on: May 22, 2013, 04:15:13 PM »
Personally I would pick Smith over Tennant. I LOVED the Tenth Doctor, and he was my first Doctor after all, but I think Smith really does a lot more for the role in general. In the same way that I don't hate the Ninth Doctor like most seem to, but there was a definite upscale in quality with Tennant.
Quote from: bosk1
As frequently happens, Super Dude nailed it.
:superdude:

Offline ACID_FOX

  • DTF's Offical Arctic Monkeys Fanboy.
  • Posts: 1408
  • Gender: Male
  • But You're Just Fiction, And I'm A Twisted Boy.
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2206 on: May 25, 2013, 10:24:02 PM »
Wait. One of the early Doctors met his thirteenth self? Anyone know the episode?

This one (written by Moffat actually): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Who_and_the_Curse_of_Fatal_Death

It was a Red Nose Day special.

That's pretty obviously a piss take and not canon :lol. I think the episode with the 13th regeneration is Trial of a/the Time Lord? Can't remember the exact title.
I only like ablums that I can xanascholithoun.

Online ariich

  • Roulette Supervillain
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 28050
  • Gender: Male
  • sexin' you later
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2207 on: May 26, 2013, 02:12:57 AM »
I can find no reference to that, so I don't think it's the case. In particular the TARDIS Data Core (best online Wiki for Doctor Who stuff) says nothing about it, not even from non-canon stuff like the books or comics (apart from the Comic Relief special that Sigz linked to).

Ariich is a freak, or somehow has more hours in the day than everyone else.
I be am boner inducing.

Offline hefdaddy42

  • Et in Arcadia Ego
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 53218
  • Gender: Male
  • Postwhore Emeritus
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2208 on: May 26, 2013, 04:36:54 AM »
It seems like I remember the Tom Baker version meeting Spider-Man in a comic when I was a kid.  I know that Marvel published Dr. Who comics back then.
Hef is right on all things. Except for when I disagree with him. In which case he's probably still right.

Offline robwebster

  • Posts: 5021
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2209 on: May 26, 2013, 06:29:50 AM »
By ariich's appointment, here is round four of the Doctor Who survivor, series four: https://www.dreamtheaterforums.org/boards/index.php?topic=37209.0

We're building a very funny list here. But I like a weird list.

Offline Jaq

  • Posts: 4050
  • Gender: Male
  • Favorite song by Europe: Carrie.
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2210 on: May 26, 2013, 02:18:10 PM »
The Doctor's never met his last incarnation. The closest he's come is the Valeyard, which formed from his darker side sometime between before his last regeneration (the exact words used, because by then they were looking for a get out of jail clause over the stated 13 lives. By the way, if you think that's going to stand..) There are no meetings with future Doctors in any of the novels, and while future Doctors have been shown, just not meeting the Doctor) they notably haven't been described or given a number. The obvious reason why the Doctor hasn't met a future self is that people say it locks them into casting that person as the Doctor, though, seriously, writing their way out of that wouldn't be that hard.

As for the Omega theory...god I hope not. The one constant, thus far, with the multi-Doctor stories is that they've all sucked. Yes, all of them. Except for Time Crash, which had the benefit of only being 10 minutes long and a Moffat story from before his tendency to solve plots with ontological paradoxes became the show's MO. The one constant with all the stories involving Omega and his creators, the guys who wrote the Three Doctors, is...they sucked. Omega has also been beaten to death in the non-canon stories as well (I think he came back to our universe and then wound up in a black hole AGAIN in the audios.) People have been theorizing that Omega was going to return for ages, but I hope not. Give me something new, Moffat.
The bones of beasts and the bones of kings become dust in the wake of the hymn.
Mighty kingdoms rise, but they all will fall, no more than a breath on the wind.

Offline Super Dude

  • Hero of Prog
  • DTF.com Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16265
  • Gender: Male
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2211 on: May 26, 2013, 02:37:21 PM »
I think it was stated recently that he's got like 500 more regenerations.
Quote from: bosk1
As frequently happens, Super Dude nailed it.
:superdude:

Offline hefdaddy42

  • Et in Arcadia Ego
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 53218
  • Gender: Male
  • Postwhore Emeritus
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2212 on: May 26, 2013, 02:47:28 PM »
There are no meetings with future Doctors in any of the novels
Are the novels considered canon?
Hef is right on all things. Except for when I disagree with him. In which case he's probably still right.

Online ariich

  • Roulette Supervillain
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 28050
  • Gender: Male
  • sexin' you later
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2213 on: May 26, 2013, 03:23:19 PM »
There are no meetings with future Doctors in any of the novels
Are the novels considered canon?
Not really, no. Some people would consider them as such, but the TV writers would generally speaking never refer to events in the extended media (novels, audio plays, comics) like they would refer to previous events in the TV series.

I think it was stated recently that he's got like 500 more regenerations.
In the Sarah Jane Adventures, the 11th Doctor made an appearance and said that he could in theory regenerate infinitely, so they sort of covered that outside of Doctor Who itself, but it's been addressed.

Ariich is a freak, or somehow has more hours in the day than everyone else.
I be am boner inducing.

Offline Jaq

  • Posts: 4050
  • Gender: Male
  • Favorite song by Europe: Carrie.
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2214 on: May 26, 2013, 04:30:47 PM »
There are no meetings with future Doctors in any of the novels
Are the novels considered canon?

No, they're not, I'm just pointing them out because some things that people SAY are from the show are actually from non-canon secondary sources, so even in the non-canon stuff, he's never met a 13th Doctor. Kind of ruling everything out  :lol

The series actually has spent a lot of time making the novels non-canon. The novels blew Gallifrey up under different  circumstances, which meant that as the Eighth Doctor range came to a close, the novels had to suggest that Gallifrey could return...only for RTD to promptly obliterate it again.  The novels gave Sarah Jane Smith a long history where she met multiple Doctors, only for the series to come along and completely wipe that out. Given a lot of the nature of the novel lines, I think that's a good thing.
The bones of beasts and the bones of kings become dust in the wake of the hymn.
Mighty kingdoms rise, but they all will fall, no more than a breath on the wind.

Offline robwebster

  • Posts: 5021
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2215 on: May 27, 2013, 07:56:32 AM »
Round 5.

I like how well-regarded The Doctor's Daughter is. Gone, yes, but won the four-way tiebreak comfortably. A lot of the hardcore Doctor Who fans hate that one, and I can't work out why. David Tennant is brilliant in it.

Offline masterthes

  • Posts: 3975
  • Gender: Male
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2216 on: May 27, 2013, 08:14:44 AM »
Wonder if we'll ever see her again? Maybe for the anniversary?

Offline robwebster

  • Posts: 5021
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2217 on: May 27, 2013, 09:59:23 AM »
Possibly! I wouldn't put money on it, but... possibly! I'm sure we'll see her again one day, but I think it'll be a few production teams down the line. Call it a hunch.



Right! The Name of the Doctor. Rewatched it. What a funny episode.

To clarify, I did love it. So much of it. Geeky glee. Every little fanboy moment - I was actually laughing. Big grin, properly, edge of my seat for so much of the run time. They're not metaphors, either, I was really grinning, and really perching.

But... the plot wasn't up to much, was it? It answered a lot of unsolved questions, but didn't do much besides. Lots of explanations, thankless exposition-speak. "Where are we?" "Where's this?" "What happens here?" Whispermen nicely designed but underused. Jenny's death genuinely harrowing - but fixed painlessly a few minutes later. Peril in short supply. Especially later, with Clara putting herself in the timestream, which did work dramatically, but it was a hell of a foregone conclusion. As soon as the Great Intelligence did its thang, we knew that it was going to be thwarted, how it was going to be defeated, and by whom. Any consequences of the Great Intelligence's actions were sort of fangless, because we knew, due to the nature of the predestination paradox, that they were absolutely going to be undone. Strax's disintegration, the stars going out - entertaining, nice ideas, but I didn't buy them. But then, it might be different if you're eight - and I don't mean that as a slur at all, even though it does sound like one. I'm trying to think of a better way to put it. DW speaks to kids in a different way to adults, and I can completely imagine kids yelling at Clara, willing her to, "Step into the timeline!!" I may not quite be the episode's target audience.

I don't know. I liked the episode, often loved it, but I'm not convinced it was good? It feels like a very pleasant bridge. "That's what was going on there, this is what's coming up next. Any questions?" Rather, it was a quality product, but not in the same way Hide was a quality product. I think it had emphasis on thrills above plot. When the thrills are that good, I think the plot can take a back seat and still produce a cracking episode, but I don't know that it doesn't still feel like there's something missing.

I don't know. This is the strangest reaction I've yet had to an episode of Doctor Who! Still a little punchdrunk. Any thoughts?

Offline Heretic

  • hold your head up high
  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2362
  • Gender: Male
  • never give up, never give in
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2218 on: May 27, 2013, 11:50:41 AM »
Well I strongly disagree. The episode was near perfect in my opinion, and I had guessed the plot weeks in advance. The episode created one of the greatest atmospheres DW has ever created, IMO, and the tension was great. Despite knowing how Clara was going to save the Doctor, the tension for me wasn't in her reveal but rather in how worried and horrified the Doctor was and the revelation of his secret. That ending was perhaps the best ending/cliffhanger to the show yet, even more so than the fake death in series six. The GI was a fantastic enemy and I wish we'd have more time with him, as Richard Grant is amazing. I think what truly carried the episode was how relatively simple the plot was, allowing the other elements to be explored even further.

The thrills certainly were heightened, but in a great way. The episode was so brooding and worked so well in its facets I can't fathom how you'd ever not call it a good episode, when in reality I'd say it was the best of Moffat's run.

Online ariich

  • Roulette Supervillain
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 28050
  • Gender: Male
  • sexin' you later
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2219 on: May 27, 2013, 01:56:36 PM »
Well I strongly disagree. The episode was near perfect in my opinion, and I had guessed the plot weeks in advance. The episode created one of the greatest atmospheres DW has ever created, IMO, and the tension was great. Despite knowing how Clara was going to save the Doctor, the tension for me wasn't in her reveal but rather in how worried and horrified the Doctor was and the revelation of his secret. That ending was perhaps the best ending/cliffhanger to the show yet, even more so than the fake death in series six. The GI was a fantastic enemy and I wish we'd have more time with him, as Richard Grant is amazing. I think what truly carried the episode was how relatively simple the plot was, allowing the other elements to be explored even further.

The thrills certainly were heightened, but in a great way. The episode was so brooding and worked so well in its facets I can't fathom how you'd ever not call it a good episode, when in reality I'd say it was the best of Moffat's run.
I completely agree with this. Especially about the plot being simple. With anything more complex, I think the pacing would have been off as it was at the end of series 6!

And once the GI had entered the Doctor's vortex, for me the tension was not because we didn't know how the GI would be thwarted, because as you say Rob, that became instantly obvious, but because I did not know what would happen to Clara. The Doctor isn't the only character in peril.

Ariich is a freak, or somehow has more hours in the day than everyone else.
I be am boner inducing.

Offline robwebster

  • Posts: 5021
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2220 on: May 27, 2013, 02:29:34 PM »
That's fair! I think the presence of set reports from the anniversary special (which I hadn't gone seeking - just found!) undermined that one for me - but, that's outside the text, doesn't count. Can count against my experience, but not really fair against the episode itself.

Online ariich

  • Roulette Supervillain
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 28050
  • Gender: Male
  • sexin' you later
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2221 on: May 27, 2013, 03:21:07 PM »
Yeah and that's always a problem with keeping up with news outside of the show itself - one of the ultimate downfalls of being a big fan. I'm the same - I just rather put that stuff to one side when I'm watching - otherwise I'd never think that the Doctor is in any peril, as I know that the show will be continuing for the foreseeable future!

Ariich is a freak, or somehow has more hours in the day than everyone else.
I be am boner inducing.

Offline robwebster

  • Posts: 5021
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2222 on: May 28, 2013, 12:54:13 AM »
Yeah! That's one place Journey to the Centre of the TARDIS really worked for me. The second I heard Clara was going to die, heard the melted monster was her, I believed it - and as she learnt more and more about the Doctor, I believed it was truly, properly inevitable, and we'd have a new Clara for the rest of the series. Mid-season standalone episodes usually can't aim for those kind of stakes, but Journey nailed them. Finales usually can, but Name of the Doctor didn't quite sell it to me. I'm so glad it worked for other people, though. Quite superbly, by the sounds of things.

Offline El JoNNo

  • Posts: 1779
  • Gender: Male
  • EMOTRUCCI
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2223 on: May 28, 2013, 10:44:41 AM »
Should have been a two parter. I wish it showed her interacting with all the Doctor's in some way. Not necessarily talking to all but affecting something around them or something. I also thought the Doctor's grave site was hurried to much.

Offline robwebster

  • Posts: 5021
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2224 on: May 28, 2013, 11:02:15 AM »

Online ariich

  • Roulette Supervillain
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 28050
  • Gender: Male
  • sexin' you later
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2225 on: May 28, 2013, 12:41:02 PM »
All about the tie-breaks with you lot!
:lol That is the downside of your approach, but the upside is that it still ends up being fewer rounds this way than the traditional way, AND a lot more fun!

So little update from me, I've been getting back into watching classic Who these past couple of weeks. Continuing on with the 4th Doctor (Tom Baker), onto season 16 now, also known as the Key to Time. It really is good fun, if incredibly dated! Some of the stories in season 15 I really enjoyed.

Ariich is a freak, or somehow has more hours in the day than everyone else.
I be am boner inducing.

Offline Heretic

  • hold your head up high
  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2362
  • Gender: Male
  • never give up, never give in
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2226 on: May 28, 2013, 12:46:21 PM »
Yeah! That's one place Journey to the Centre of the TARDIS really worked for me. The second I heard Clara was going to die, heard the melted monster was her, I believed it - and as she learnt more and more about the Doctor, I believed it was truly, properly inevitable, and we'd have a new Clara for the rest of the series. Mid-season standalone episodes usually can't aim for those kind of stakes, but Journey nailed them. Finales usually can, but Name of the Doctor didn't quite sell it to me. I'm so glad it worked for other people, though. Quite superbly, by the sounds of things.

See now, I feel the exact opposite. I knew that no matter what, this Clara wasn't going to die, because she still hadn't pulled off her stunt to spread her throughout time. The half season was done to introduce us to the real Clara, and having her die again wouldn't have made sense, as we would have had to get used to another Clara a few episodes before the finale. I knew everything would be reversed or fixed in some way-- it is Doctor Who, after all.

Then, in the finale,  I wasn't sure what would happen. I knew Clara would be in the 50th anniversary and series 8, but there was no guarantee it would be the original Clara. Thus, when she stepped into the timeline, for all we knew, she was dead, and the Doctor would have to find another Clara from his timeline to continue on journeying with. I assumed that wouldn't happen, though, because after all the times she had saved the Doctor, I knew it would be time for him to save her, (which they actually put into a line in the show! why aren't I writing for Doctor Who, eh?) so like I said the tension was most in the reveal of Doctor Hurt for me.

Offline robwebster

  • Posts: 5021
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2227 on: May 28, 2013, 01:41:16 PM »
Ha! There we go, then!

I'm beginning to think I'm just a rubbish Doctor Who fan. I've got my top favourites list upside down. Still - something for everyone! Rarely everyone at the same time, but that's true of anything.

Online ariich

  • Roulette Supervillain
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 28050
  • Gender: Male
  • sexin' you later
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2228 on: May 28, 2013, 01:55:09 PM »
I'm beginning to think I'm just a rubbish Doctor Who fan. I've got my top favourites list upside down. Still - something for everyone! Rarely everyone at the same time, but that's true of anything.
Exactly, just because different people have different preferences, doesn't make anyone a less good fan!

Ariich is a freak, or somehow has more hours in the day than everyone else.
I be am boner inducing.

Offline robwebster

  • Posts: 5021
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2229 on: May 29, 2013, 11:23:17 AM »
Series four, round seven. Getting through these at a hell of a pace.

Online ariich

  • Roulette Supervillain
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 28050
  • Gender: Male
  • sexin' you later
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2230 on: May 29, 2013, 01:27:17 PM »
Yeah definitely. Interesting to see how the results are panning out as well, the first 3 series were pretty close to my own opinions (though not quite the same) but this series is totally off!

Ariich is a freak, or somehow has more hours in the day than everyone else.
I be am boner inducing.

Offline robwebster

  • Posts: 5021
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2231 on: May 30, 2013, 12:10:13 PM »
Word. There's always been at least one ep in each round where I've gone, "Really? That one? But it's brilliant!" and others that I've thought slightly outstayed their welcome.

This round? Spot on.

Offline robwebster

  • Posts: 5021
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2232 on: May 31, 2013, 02:14:05 PM »
Not only will we have our next three finalists in under 24 hours...

...but I just made the banners for series five. God, I love that series. It's really, truly, the best thing Doctor Who's ever done. I might just not vote.

Online ariich

  • Roulette Supervillain
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 28050
  • Gender: Male
  • sexin' you later
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2233 on: May 31, 2013, 02:43:56 PM »
Hell yeah. I've been watching Doctor Who with my girlfriend to get her all caught up, and we've picked up the pace a lot since moving in together a month ago. We've just started on series 5 now, so I'm very excited to watch it again!

It is crazy that I've been watching 3 different time streams for Doctor Who recently: (i) the new episodes as they air, (ii) catching up on the David Tennant series with my girlfriend, and (iii) gradually getting through the classic series in the Tom Baker era.

Ariich is a freak, or somehow has more hours in the day than everyone else.
I be am boner inducing.

Offline GuineaPig

  • Posts: 3754
  • Gender: Male
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2234 on: June 01, 2013, 03:55:07 PM »
SPOILERS for the 50th anniversary special

(seriously don't click this link if you don't want spoilers)

Here.
"In the beginning, the universe was created. This made a lot of people very angry, and has been widely regarded as a bad idea."

Offline Sigz

  • BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD
  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13537
  • Gender: Male
  • THRONES FOR THE THRONE SKULL
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2235 on: June 01, 2013, 03:56:15 PM »
Saw that. I have immensely mixed and conflicting emotions, but am excited none the less.
Quote
The world is a stage, but the play is badly cast.

Online ariich

  • Roulette Supervillain
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 28050
  • Gender: Male
  • sexin' you later
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2236 on: June 01, 2013, 04:09:13 PM »
Yeah same Ian, shame in many ways but kind of exciting as well! And now the fact that they won't be shooting series 8 until the new year makes sense, I had wondered at the time that was announced whether it was because they wanted to hold off on any spoilers - looks like I was right!

And I shouldn't worry about spoilers GP, it's all over every news site (at least here in the UK it is) so there's no way people could possibly miss it.

Ariich is a freak, or somehow has more hours in the day than everyone else.
I be am boner inducing.

Offline skydivingninja

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 11600
  • Gender: Male
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2237 on: June 01, 2013, 04:13:48 PM »
Wow.  I'm really really sad about this, especially since there was a report saying he was confirmed for season 8 :/  I was hoping for at least another season before he left us.  Any word on whether Moffat's leaving too?  I remember he said he was close to leaving.

Offline Sigz

  • BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD
  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13537
  • Gender: Male
  • THRONES FOR THE THRONE SKULL
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2238 on: June 01, 2013, 04:15:25 PM »
And I shouldn't worry about spoilers GP, it's all over every news site (at least here in the UK it is) so there's no way people could possibly miss it.

Yeah, I don't see how it's possible to avoid news like this even if you tried, it's fucking everywhere.
Quote
The world is a stage, but the play is badly cast.

Offline GuineaPig

  • Posts: 3754
  • Gender: Male
Re: Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor
« Reply #2239 on: June 01, 2013, 04:20:55 PM »
Yeah.  Figured I might as well.

Ok then.  10 bucks says the next Doctor is a woman.
"In the beginning, the universe was created. This made a lot of people very angry, and has been widely regarded as a bad idea."