Hopefully, this will make sense...
A co-worker of mine is, like me, a sports fan. Unlike me, he takes an interest in college and even local high school sports. He attended UCLA and is a fan of all things UCLA. I had a very non-traditional college experience, so I don't have any real allegiance to a school. As a kid, I chose UCLA over USC in terms of local rooting, but I rarely watch college sports and regard college football and basketball as essentially professional minor leagues.
Earlier this week, my co-worker asked about what college football games I had watched on Saturday. I told him I didn't watch any because I regard it as an inferior product. He then began to argue that it was a superior product because, while the gameplay itself may be inferior, everything else about it is better. My response was, simply, that I'm there for the game and don't care about the rest of that stuff. He seemed to be flabbergasted about that.
I'll also point out that this same guy, after I had returned from Chicago and my first visit to Wrigley Field last year, asked me if I had seen something in particular. I commented that once I actually entered the stadium, I didn't do too much exploring. His response was something like, "well...what else did you have to do?" to which I responded, "watch the game." Again, this seemed to baffle him.
So...since this stuck with me throughout the week, I figured I see if folks here have thoughts on this. Is the game central to your experience or just one part of a bigger experience that is no more or less important than any other part?