I hope MP will not cripple modern DT
This.
Glad I'm not the only one saying it.
You said somewhere else you were concerned DT were going to "regress". I asked what you meant, given I would contend there used to be more variety in their music prior to Mike's departure, but I don't know if you saw? And now you're concerned he might "cripple" modern DT - I wonder if you might expand on that?
Sorry I missed your earlier question. My concerns echo a lot of what other posters have already said in this thread and others. I've seen things like someone mention a proposed setlist with a long medley based on The Shattered Fortress (heaven help us), setlists with nothing but songs from pre-2010 (with one token song from the last decade thrown in), and wishes for the band to "pick up where they left off" in 2010. It just makes me sad, because it feels like erasure of an entire epoch of the band's history that is representative of the band as I came to know and love them.
I was not there in the Portnoy era, so my only experience with it is through the recordings, dvd's, behind the scenes, etc of an earlier time. I hope I am very wrong about this, but it seems that he was doing things sometimes merely for shock value. I'm not downplaying the fact however that he is an extremely gifted musician just like the others and I do respect him as one of the founding fathers of this band. I think that I can grow to trust his influence, and their decision, in time. But as a fan from the last ten years it's an adjustment for me, just as it was an adjustment for those of you who were already on this journey back then. I may appear full of vinegar right now but it's the way I'm dealing with the adjustment, and the fears that this will now change the band as I have come to experience them. I'm sure that I speak for many others who are in my cohort and are concerned about the same things, and the mourning(? for lack of a less-dramatic term) that comes with the end of an era.
When I think of "modern DT", I think of stellar, unmatched technical precision. I think of music that spans and even transcends genre, from the earth-moving strength of metal through to the meticulous clarity of classical, and yet somehow includes it all, in a celebration of compositional perfection.
I believe they did have these qualities in the past, otherwise I wouldn't love some of the older albums as much as I do. But from my vantage point it seems as if other things started taking over at a certain point, things that I hope we don't see happening again.
That said I really
don't want to attend a concert and sit through a two-hour rehash of In The Presence of Enemies. If that happens then I'll just go home and enjoy Breaking the Fourth Wall (and as usual, skip TSF 😁).
And my apologies for being at times somewhat negative and emotional (see second paragraph). I appreciate your POV as well, and indeed as you said (and I agreed with) elsewhere it's ok to enjoy different things about our favorite band. It's bound to happen that there will be "generations" (using this term loosely as this often has nothing to do with age) of fans who have differing perspectives when a band reaches almost 40 years of history. The perspective of the more veteran fans can even help those of us now who are going through the same adjustment that you all did in 2010. A little "Hey, cheer up, it does get better" could go a lot farther than separating the veterans from us Mangini-era whippersnappers 😁 and both groups pitting against each other. I'm not saying this has yet happened, but I've felt the echoes of where this may go and I doubt it's what the band, or any of us, actually want.
Alright, I have talked way too much, and this could probably use a good edit for clarity, but I'm off to start my day. I hope that I have at least clarified my point of view in a way that is a bit more relatable and understandable.