0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
would have thought the same thing but seeing the OP was TAC i immediately thought Maiden or DT related
Winger Theater Forums........or WTF.
TAC got a higher score than me in the electronic round? Honestly, can I just drop out now?
I'm gonna overtake Chad in the cheating department pretty soon the way I'm going.
Vmadera The Stone Roses-I Am The ResurrectionLet’s bust out the fucking hula hoops, make some TV Dinners, and watch Laugh In.V, I asked why you sent this to me because I thought it was an extremely interesting choice. Pleasantly interesting, I must say. The style of the first half, which sounds like The Monkees, is not really my style, but it’s quirky enough and holds my attention. But then, halfway though, it goes on this long instrumental section, ultimately to close out the song. I have to say that I loved this part. I’m actually surprised it went on as long as it did. But I love long instrumental passages like this.8.0
Quote from: DragonAttack on February 08, 2023, 09:52:25 PMI'll wear the comments as a badge of honor forever. (it'll make up for all the 1s and 2s I get from here on in).Tim doesn't give out 1s and 2s (unless it's a Winger round) - he hated everything about Genesis tune and it still got 6.5.
I'll wear the comments as a badge of honor forever. (it'll make up for all the 1s and 2s I get from here on in).
...going along with Dragon Attack's Queen thread has been like taking a free class in Queen knowledge. Where else are you gonna find info like that?!
Quote from: wolfking on February 09, 2023, 03:53:07 AMI'm gonna overtake Chad in the cheating department pretty soon the way I'm going.Yeah, that is some next level shit!
That's a word salad - and take it from me, I know word salad
I fear for the day when something happens on the right that is SO nuts that even Stadler says "That's crazy".
Remember the mark of a great vocalist is if TAC hates them with a special passion
Quote from: TAC on February 09, 2023, 06:40:59 AMQuote from: wolfking on February 09, 2023, 03:53:07 AMI'm gonna overtake Chad in the cheating department pretty soon the way I'm going.Yeah, that is some next level shit!
Must've been from a Pats game
Stadler Genesis-Eleventh Earl Of MarI’m sorry..is this the Wussy Keyboard Round?Oh boy..Stadler, I admire your conviction with this entry. It’s obvious that this means a lot to you, so I’m not going to rip this too hard. But seriously, ARE YOU FUCKING CRAZY??I actually hated everything about this so I’ll spare you the details. 6.5
Lonestar, speaking wise.
Listen to Lonestar and trust him.
Hated everything about it, still gets an above average score.
Just popping in to say Luke, you were right.
Quote from: lonestar on February 09, 2023, 09:21:29 AMHated everything about it, still gets an above average score.That’s not an above average score. But I can’t tank anyone for the entire roulette based on one round. It was either going to be a 6 or a 6.5 as the minimum score going forward. I chose the 6.5 as the Participation Score.
Quote from: TAC on February 09, 2023, 09:28:40 AMQuote from: lonestar on February 09, 2023, 09:21:29 AMHated everything about it, still gets an above average score.That’s not an above average score. But I can’t tank anyone for the entire roulette based on one round. It was either going to be a 6 or a 6.5 as the minimum score going forward. I chose the 6.5 as the Participation Score. I was actually thinking for my next roulette, to do ranked scoring, with the best getting 10 and the worst getting 1. It'll make it so much more exciting
Quote from: lonestar on February 09, 2023, 09:39:19 AMQuote from: TAC on February 09, 2023, 09:28:40 AMQuote from: lonestar on February 09, 2023, 09:21:29 AMHated everything about it, still gets an above average score.That’s not an above average score. But I can’t tank anyone for the entire roulette based on one round. It was either going to be a 6 or a 6.5 as the minimum score going forward. I chose the 6.5 as the Participation Score. I was actually thinking for my next roulette, to do ranked scoring, with the best getting 10 and the worst getting 1. It'll make it so much more excitingI think the stack ranked method is the best to be as objective as possible, and then no one gets all butthurt over a 1 - it was just the worst song of the round; someone had to submit the worst song. I actually admire those that have the conviction to rate something under 5 on a 10 point scale. Basically, this roulette scoring scale is now 6-10 - and with 1 decimal point, that provides for 40 increments to rate with. Which is all fine ... but at that point, one could also make it a 1-4 scale; or a 1-20 with 1/2 point incrementsThe fixation on 10 point scale is so arbitrary.
Hey Tim, how's your taste for power ballads?
Congrats Lizzo!
Litho ... The North American Evermind!
Litho is like the Stadler on the Music side.
Quote from: TAC on February 09, 2023, 09:28:40 AMQuote from: lonestar on February 09, 2023, 09:21:29 AMHated everything about it, still gets an above average score.That’s not an above average score. But I can’t tank anyone for the entire roulette based on one round. It was either going to be a 6 or a 6.5 as the minimum score going forward. I chose the 6.5 as the Participation Score. Damn, not as mean as me, but downright warm and cuddly compared to Luke. Not a system I was expecting.
This first band is Soen very cool swingy jazz fusion kinda stuff.
I don't mind it but I don't know why Tim is using a scale of 1 to 10.
I thought about stacking, but the problem is that it forces you to actually have a linear ranking. The advantage of scoring is that several entries can have the same score, and I don't actually have to pick which song from each of the micro-batches I prefer, I just have a number of tiers.
You're fast.
You're fast. Sent.
His wife told me that he's fast in bed too.