Nirvana-In Utero
Great call!
Well, you're right on the band, but wrong album: MTV Unplugged In New York. No offense, but while I'm not a huge Nirvana fan to begin with, In Utero is their worst record.
1. I never considered 'Unplugged' (or any live album for that matter) to be an official 'album' release. By this logic, 'Celebration Day' is Led Zeppelin's final release.
2. Count me in as someone who considers 'In Utero' to not only be Nirvana's best album (by a mile), but also one of the best album's of the decade.
I love Albini's production (do you all know that, to this day, the man still charges a flat fee to record, and only made a few thousand dollars to record Nirvana?).
The songs are a great representation of everything Kurt had done as a songwriter...pensive ballads (Dumb), radio-friendly-unit-shifters (Heart Shaped Box, Rape Me), stage-ready rockers (Serve the Servents, Frances Farmer...), and brazen noise-fests (Tourettes). Oh, and don't even get me started on Scentless Apprentice...jesus, what a riff!
The performances are visceral (again, thanks to Albini's methods).
And, above all else, I feel like the album was a nod to where Kurt was heading. Obviously, the man (really, he was still a kid) was troubled, but I firmly believe that if he had gotten the help he so desparately needed, he could've/would've setteled into a reclusive, artistic phase not unlike J. Mascis or Bob Mould or Pearl Jam, content to write and record without the pressure of expectation. His fans would've been there for all the twists and turns, and the masses would continue to say 'Nevermind was their peak.'
Bleach is interesting.
Nevermind is, well, it's the closest thing alt-rock got to 'Thriller.'
In Utero, however, is the epitome of a band captured at the peak of their powers.