I'm something of a bandwagon Warriors fan myself, and really more of a Steph fan. I'm not from the bay area, though I did have a great vacation there a couple decades ago that probably helps a bit. But Steph is basically the reason I started watching basketball again after losing interest in it after high school for a long time. For reasons I might mention at some other point I had started paying very casual attention to playoff results in the early 10s, but it was hearing about the 24-0 run the Warriors had to start the '15-'16 season that really started sucking me back in, and I actually started watching occasional full games again. Not much in the regular season, but I still keep up with results, news, rumors and such decently, and then ramp it up more in the playoffs.
Particularly memorable was the night Steph broke the 3-point record against the Grizzlies (also caught a bit of Kobe's last game that night since the station feed switched to it). Steph just had this fascinating playstyle that remains endlessly entertaining to watch. But if Steph retires or (god forbid) goes to another team my interest will likely diminish or shift.
I'm sure there's going to be an excessive amount of all-time ranking talk in the media for days to come and more, so here's my small contribution to get ahead of the curve before it gets exhausting. I think there is tier 1 which is MJ, KAJ, and LBJ in some order. After that I think it's a relatively level playing field for tier 2, with some ordering of Duncan, Hakeem, Bird, Magic, Russell, Wilt, Shaq, Kobe, and now, Steph. Everyone else is a tier below. Depending upon what it is you value, you could put that 9 in almost any order and I wouldn't complain too much.
So yeah, there's some recency bias and glow at work, but I can see a possible argument for Steph at #4, though I could also be talked out of it. Probably more reasonable to have him on the lower end of the tier since he's arguably just moved into it, and reevaluate when his career is over. It's just been so intriguing to see how at an age where a lot of players are in a steep decline (heck, just look at Westbrook and Harden this year), he's continued to be dazzling with the ball, and even when he doesn't have it he seems to make players like Wiggins and Looney look like superstars at times, when they would probably just be good role players if they weren't playing with him.
It's curious how Wiggins and Looney have arguably been more impactful than Klay and Dray. Klay is just too inconsistent right now, and it's hard to say how much is the rust of not playing for two years, age-related decline, or just that'll he'll never be back fully to what he used to be because of the two serious injuries he'd had to come back from. We'll have a better idea next season. Draymond has pissed me off at various points in the playoffs, but he's had some redemptive moments in the last few games.
So rather than a big three, the Warriors' roster this playoffs has really been a big one with just a rotating cast of players stepping up at key times to contribute. Poole and Payton particularly as well. I'd have to think/read more about it, but it has to be somewhere up there with carry jobs like Hakeem in '94 or Dirk in '11. Maybe a bit below those for a variety of reasons, but still really impressive. The offseason and next year will be fascinating to see what happens with Kuminga, Moody, and Wiseman as well. Crazy to think that the Warriors might be even better next year.