Quitting: "I need to concentrate on other things, I quit."
If you say "I need this and that OR I'll quit" and the others say "You're not getting what you need" means that the others make the decision on your behalf. And that's the same as giving the boot. I'm not on anyone's side here - not a fanboy on either side - that's just the way it is.
And that's my opinion, to which I'm entitled. I've been in loads of similar situations - on both sides. No need for anyone to agree with it.
First, we all have opinions, and we routinely debate the merits of those opinions. You don't get to short-circuit that discussion simply by declaring, "it's my opinion and I'm entitled to it."
Second, whether MP quit or was fired is a matter of fact, not opinion.
Third, when the man himself publicly states, "I have decided to leave," it's awfully odd for someone completely disconnected from the situation to say, in effect, "No. You didn't 'decide[] to leave;' you were fired."
Fourth, no one who was actually involved in the situation ever said that MP went to the other four guys and said, "I need us to take a break, and if you don't agree, I'm going to quit."
IF that had happened, then you could make a semi-logical argument that, by saying "no" to the break, the band was, in effect firing him. However, everything that has ever been made public indicates that MP went to the rest of the band and said, "Hey...I need us to take a break. What do you think?" That's it. The rest of the guys said, "no." At that point, MP then made the decision to leave. In other words, he quit. Obviously, none of us were privy to those communications, but this is what everyone involved has publicly said happened. It was not, "give me what I want or I quit," and they called his bluff. Rather, it was, "I want this," and they said "no," so he then "decided to leave."
If you want to believe the world is flat, that's your call, but don't expect that you can post something that simply isn't true and not have folks call you on it.