Good article, good insight, but I object to the personification of that last paragraph or two. It's not MY gold medal; I could give a shit.
I don't think it's for us to say whether it's worth it or not. I think the judgment that "no medal is worth injury" from a third party is just as problematic as the judgement that "the gold medal is worth more than your individual being" from a third party. It's not our (the peanut gallery) call whether the athlete lives with the regret of being this close, or lives with the memory of overcoming obstacles at some personal cost. There was already so much sacrifice from those people - the athletes, the families, the friends - to even get to that point, that it's not something we should be making proclamations about from in front of our computer as we wolf down a Jersey Mike's Old Fashioned Italian. I'm not taking sides here; I don't know, I don't have the answer, and I've never been in that position either as an athlete or a father, since I sucked* and my kid got my ex-wife's athletic ability. But EDIT: as TAC points out, one hires Bela Karolyi for a reason and with full understanding. Their determination should carry more weight than a pundit or observer.
(And no, I don't at all consider "pushing an athlete to his/her limits on the field" to be abuse, and CERTAINLY not abuse at the level of Larry Nassar.)
* I was actually a very good athlete, but I was a big-ish fish in a really small pond. I never had any real taste of greatness at the levels we're talking about.