Of course you have that right. Never said otherwise. But there's a degree of reasonableness. I think Disney SHOULD open their parks for free, and give me free, cold beer each time I get on a ride. And I have that right to say that. It's not grounded in any reality other than my own but I have the right to say that.
It'd just be nice for once to have even ONE post say "I get that it's not reality, I get that it would likely have other consequences I know nothing about, but I'd sure feel a lot better if this is how it was handled!" Instead, it's like the threads on the new DT song; you SAY you're respectful to the legal argument, and you SAY you understand it, but the bulk of the posts don't read that way.
I'm not sure I've articulated this yet, but I would not be THAT surprised if Disney WANTED her to sue so that they COULD pay her, in a confidential settlement, as opposed to making a unilateral decision that would (potentially) have dollars consequences far beyond her particular cut. Wouldn't be the first time.
Not to say that companies don't make bad decisions - they do - but for every bad decision you hear about there are 10's of thousands of decisions that are good (more or less) that you've never heard of. If I learned anything working for General Electric for over a decade, the crazier a corporate decision seems to the outsider, the less crazy it ACTUALLY likely was in the boardroom.