Well, if you're going to be all literal, then you have to take ALL of the words I wrote into consideration as well. I said, repeatedly, that I MAY be talking about the PARENTS REACTION not the emails themselves. So I'm meeting you both half way right out the gate. And I was VERY clear that I saw the problem as the disconnect between the message itself - which I never once ever even implied was false or not truthful - and the receipt of that message.
So, yea, apparently you're defining "misleading" as being "factually accurate or not" and that's a slightly different definition of "misleading" than I'm using. I'm not saying the email is false; I'm saying that the facts - accurate facts - in the email MAY, and I'd even say "LIKELY", result in reactions that are out of context with the simple idea of "reporting".