No need to be condescending. I'm continuously happy to start a yet another cultural grievance diatribe (nothing dismissive about that, amiright?) about "victim culture", because it's true. The two points are not mutually exclusive. As the son of a man who is handicapped, I can tell you first hand that society doesn't bend over for the disabled, and I'm not sure why we're all of a sudden making that the sticking point now. Regardless, he'd be the first to tell you that life isn't a plastic bubble. These arguments about liberty and mandates aren't about the disabled, they're about power and politics.
(And by the by, I never said "if you get COVID it's your fault", nor the corollary. I'm pointing at the whole idea of "fault" to begin with.I think you can do everything right, follow all the rules and guess what, life's going to kick you in the onions regardless. That doesn't mean you do nothing, but it does say that the idea of "fault" is limited in it's effectiveness.)
Well, don't tell me to not be "condescending" when you start with the blanket statement that most Americans just want to play the victim card... lol
I'm not going to quibble with you: I stated an opinion that I believe and that has nothing to do with you. You can like, or not, that opinion at your choice. YOU commented on MY statement and dismissed it summarily. Very different.
I want to unpack what Benjamin said because there are problems with the mentality. Similar to darkshade's earlier posts (and he never addressed my questions along these lines).
It's not enough to say "Well, I'll do what I want, and I'll own it if I get COVID" because doing whatever you want during COVID and saying you'll take responsibility for it is not like saying "I'll go to whatever dirty websites I want with no ad blocker or anti-virus, and if my computer gets a virus, so be it". There are very broad implications of the self-responsibility angle because a personal choice to not wear a mask or not get vaccinated (or go to work sick, or whatever) can put others in harm's way. You've already said multiple times that you agree with masking, encouraging the vax, and other protocols, so this isn't an attack on your personally, it's a rejection of the attitude that looks at the pandemic as an individual measure of risk vs a social one.
Well, it is, to a degree, because it's not absolute. I agree with masking (I mask 97% of the time), I agree with vaccinating (I was vaccinated the second day it was available to me), and I strongly encourage the dissemination of FACTUAL, UNBIASED information to allow people to make informed choices. But I don't agree with TELLING PEOPLE they have to do what I did. If a store wants to, so be it, I can choose to go or not go. But I don't believe the government is here to play recess monitor to the grand playground that is life.
We need to do both, I think. My family and I have our own levels of risk for ourselves, and what we are willing/are not willing to put ourselves through. We also accept that there are unprecedented concerns with COVID being particularly harmful for certain groups, with some proven measures that can help slow the spread. Those people chest-pounding on the side-line about "if I get sick, I'll be fine", or "if I get it, no big deal" are missing the bigger picture of all the different things that need to go right in order to put the pandemic behind us.
So where is the line then? Is it on you and your family to decide "well, maybe I don't get to go to concerts", or is it on Government to make sure that every concert gets played and only the vaccinated and masked get to see them (note, I said GOVERNMENT, not the promoter or the band).
First off, believing that the Government should play some role in the public health is not "victim culture". No one expects the Government to keep them safe from all harm. And people who expect the Government to be able to do something about a crisis are also not "victims" with unrealistic expectations about their Government. They want the Governing body they already give like 20-30% of their salary to to do something.
I didn't say that. Government SHOULD play SOME role in the public health. Doing research, providing information, providing guidelines. But who has the first priority when there is conflict? Who has the responsibility if one of the respective parties fails in their duty? Those are the things that lead to a "victim culture". I actually don't think we're at cross-purposes here, we're just working through the definitions, where the line is. Though I will say, you're encroaching on that with your last sentence: "do something". That's not the standard, "doing something". That's the answer when there's a mass killing; government has to "do something". And they invariably do, our politicians pat each other on the back about how great they are, and there is invariably another, more heinous slaughter some time after, because they're either not able to or not willing to do the RIGHT something.
And that's where the rubber meets the road; Florida is in the news because it's Florida and we have to mock and ridicule when someone disagrees with us, moreso when it's someone like Ron DeSantis who doesn't kowtow. Yet....
Florida is STILL below the national average for deaths per 1M and those states that did "all the right things" (like mine, and those around me) are still well above them. Florida has not even 2/3 the deaths/1M that my state has, and we "did something". Even in cases, Florida is rising, but still not top five when adjusted for population, and the number one state is still a very blue state in New England, and my neighbor to the east.
I think we're arguing semantics without having the language in front of us. I'm not accusing you of being a victim, and I'm not saying we should do "nothing". I'm saying that the victim culture REQUIRES that there be fault and that it be someone else. I'm less arguing the "someone else" as I am the "that there is fault to begin with". I feel bad for you and your family. I'm sensitive to that. My uncle died of COVID and if my dad gets it, it's likely game over (he lives in Florida, by the way). I get the need to want everything to be as perfect as it can be, but at the end of the day, there are limitations, and we need to be prepared for that.