I’m a big supporter of building up natural immunity. That said, while I agree that kids need to build it up and be exposed to stuff, the mask won’t have an impact on that. So while it’s literal, best I can read, that is how Mrs. Tac was meaning it. Though he can correct me if I’m wrong.
Generally speaking, aren't the masks designed to keep germs out (or in)? If they have no impact on exposing kids to stuff, why do the kids have to wear them?
Depends on the type of mask and the size of the droplets/particles we want to keep in or out.
Are schools talking about mask mandates? (I genuinely have no idea.) I'm torn on the masks for kids subject. The age of the kid factors in. As does the potential the kid has an underlying medical condition OR a parent/family member at home with an underlying medical condition. Seems like the middle school and high schooler can decide if they want to wear one.
I think masking younger kids is useless. They are going to spread their germs and masks won't stop that much. I think focusing on hand washing and keeping kids home when they have symptoms would be a better bang for our buck (as far as lowering transmission of diseases).
I don't think masks will get in the way of a healthy immune system development. Immediately after birth a healthy infant begins building their immune systems. Want a healthy immune system in kids? Let them play on the dirty carpet, get a dog, take them to some preschool playdates and family get-togethers. That'll be more than sufficient.
Frankly, monkeypox in the school setting is more worrisome to me by the day. I guess we'll see what happens come fall.