I read a comment recently that in a way gave L&T new meaning.
The comment mentioned how the entire movie it's been told from Korg's view (The movie starts and ends with him narrating, so it is assume the rest is also a narration except for the first scene with Gorr), which is why is so goofy. Some of the scenes Korg wasn't even present for, and he might be exaggerating the details based on what he knows.
The comment comes off as an excuse for how poorly executed the movie was, but at the same time it does makes sense in its own way. With that said, I liked the movie a bit more the second time I saw it, but it is still bottom of the barrel for me.
I read something like that way back when the movie first came out, and I thought it made a lot of sense. The scenes with Zeus, for example, were ridiculous and so over-the-top that they
had to be parody. They were supposed to be! In that context, I thought they were hilarious. There were other scenes that were similarly incredible, and again, if you presume they're meant to be that way, they work.
Now... how all that is supposed to work with the very serious story of Gorr and the Godslayer, I don't know. That didn't work.
Same with Jane becoming the new Thor. I get that that's a storyline from the comics, but as one of the carefully selected stories they've chosen to tell within MCU, I had trouble with it. On the other hand, it was very sad that she was dying from cancer and this gave her character a much more positive arc.
The movie was still a mess, but it wasn't completely devoid of entertainment value like some are saying. There's always a certain amount of "switch off your brain and just get into it" involved with MCU; this one just took a bit more.