Poll

Which decade of studio albums would you take for the rest of your life?

70's (Rush through Hemispheres)
80's (Permanent Waves through Presto)

Voting closes: September 22, 2026, 07:08:25 PM

Author Topic: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's  (Read 9090 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jjrock88

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 14911
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #105 on: December 20, 2020, 01:05:17 PM »
This is tough because Rush's best album, Snakes & Arrows, doesn't fit into these decades, I'll go with 70s

Interesting, can’t say I’ve ever heard someone say S&A is the best Rush album

Offline SoundscapeMN

  • Posts: 6469
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #106 on: December 20, 2020, 03:35:27 PM »
This is tough because Rush's best album, Snakes & Arrows, doesn't fit into these decades, I'll go with 70s

Interesting, can’t say I’ve ever heard someone say S&A is the best Rush album

yeah, someone like myself who considers Snakes & Arrows Rush's worst album, lol.

Offline Nekov

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 10719
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #107 on: December 20, 2020, 07:03:37 PM »
80's easily.

This. Their best 3 or 4 albums for me are in the 80s.
When Ginobili gets hot, I get hot in my pants. 

Offline ReaperKK

  • Sweeter After Difficulty
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 17771
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #108 on: December 21, 2020, 06:16:27 AM »
:lol I was curious what you guys were gonna say but yea, I think S&A is their best album. It was the first full Rush album I listened to and the one I listen to most now.

This is tough because Rush's best album, Snakes & Arrows, doesn't fit into these decades, I'll go with 70s

 :eek :eek

Kinda early to be drinking on a Sunday, no? :P

I took a double to get the courage to post my take here

Offline ProfessorPeart

  • MP.com Refugee
  • Posts: 3216
  • Gender: Male
  • Lubed In The Face
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #109 on: December 21, 2020, 08:22:59 AM »
I legitimately couldn’t care less about this poll and won’t participate. 70s and 80s Rush rule  :metal

So you choose not to decide?

 :lol

Like, jj, I 'still have made a choice'. I choose not to decide. I have been pondering this since the thread started and I am frozen. Can't decide.
beul ni teh efac = Lube In The Face / That has to be wrong.  :lol / EDIT: Oh, it's Blue! I'm an idiot.
Pardon the interruption, but I just had to run in and celebrate the majesty of Lube in the Face as highest moment in roulette history

Offline hefdaddy42

  • Et in Arcadia Ego
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 53045
  • Gender: Male
  • Postwhore Emeritus
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #110 on: December 21, 2020, 01:25:48 PM »
Exactly!  :lol

Did you love the Karate Kid movies?



MovIES??

Nah. I've seen the first one.
God dammit
Hef is right on all things. Except for when I disagree with him. In which case he's probably still right.

Offline KevShmev

  • EZBoard Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 41963
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #111 on: December 21, 2020, 05:54:15 PM »
:lol I was curious what you guys were gonna say but yea, I think S&A is their best album. It was the first full Rush album I listened to and the one I listen to most now.

This is tough because Rush's best album, Snakes & Arrows, doesn't fit into these decades, I'll go with 70s

 :eek :eek

Kinda early to be drinking on a Sunday, no? :P

I took a double to get the courage to post my take here

Haha, all good!

Despite my playful pun, Rush was so great that almost any album could be a fan's favorite. 

I was a big S& fan when it was first out, and truth be told, I still like it a lot; I just like almost every album of theirs more.

Online TAC

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 74441
  • Gender: Male
  • Arthritic Metal Horns
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #112 on: December 21, 2020, 06:44:32 PM »


I was a big S& fan when it was first out, and truth be told, I still like it a lot; I just like almost every album of theirs more.

It is so bad you can't even refer to it by its full name.
would have thought the same thing but seeing the OP was TAC i immediately thought Maiden or DT related
Winger Theater Forums........or WTF.  ;D
TAC got a higher score than me in the electronic round? Honestly, can I just drop out now? :lol

Offline SoundscapeMN

  • Posts: 6469
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #113 on: December 21, 2020, 08:05:08 PM »
kind of interesting, I just glanced at rateyourmusic.com's Rush albums, and S&A's is rated far higher than 7 other albums in their discography on that site. Going back to Hold Your Fire, the only album rated higher than it is Counterparts.

Rush 3.25 (4,582)
Fly By Night 3.50 (5,086)
Caress of Steel 3.36 (4,064)
2112 3.78 (10,936)
A Farewell to Kings 3.87 (7,181)
Hemispheres 3.91 (7,753)
Permanent Waves 3.86 (7,349)
Moving Pictures 3.92 (13,528)
Signals 3.69 (4,688)
Grace Under Pressure 3.68 (3,849)
Power Windows 3.52 (3,058)
Hold Your Fire 3.24 (2,592)
Presto 3.13 (2,429)
Roll the Bones 3.15 (2,468)
Counterparts 3.49 (2,572)
Test for Echo 3.03 (2,184)
Vapor Trails 3.13 (2,332)
Snakes and Arrows 3.38 (2,590)
Clockwork Angels 3.53 (2,849)

Per Rating
1. Moving Pictures 3.92 (13,528)
2. Hemispheres 3.91 (7,753)
3. A Farewell to Kings 3.87 (7,181)
4. Permanent Waves 3.86 (7,349)
5. 2112 3.78 (10,936)
6. Signals 3.69 (4,688)
7. Grace Under Pressure 3.68 (3,849)
8. Clockwork Angels 3.53 (2,849)
9. Power Windows 3.52 (3,058)
10. Fly By Night 3.50 (5,086)
11. Counterparts 3.49 (2,572)
12. Snakes and Arrows 3.38 (2,590)
13. Caress of Steel 3.36 (4,064)
14. Rush 3.25 (4,582)
15. Hold Your Fire 3.24 (2,592)
16. Roll the Bones 3.15 (2,468)
17. Presto 3.13 (2,429)
18. Vapor Trails 3.13 (2,332)
19. Test for Echo 3.03 (2,184)

Online Stadler

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 43291
  • Gender: Male
  • Pointing out the "unfunny" since 2014!
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #114 on: December 22, 2020, 08:49:32 AM »
It's not their best, but I like S&A better than anything after Presto, for sure, except MAYBE Counterparts.  I'd have to listen to them both back to back.  But it smokes RTB and T4E, and I prefer it over VT and CA.   
« Last Edit: December 22, 2020, 10:16:14 AM by Stadler »

Offline ReaperKK

  • Sweeter After Difficulty
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 17771
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #115 on: December 22, 2020, 08:59:24 AM »
I'm hoping my 4.5 rating on RYM contributed to the albums success :lol

Offline WildRanger

  • Posts: 1301
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #116 on: December 22, 2020, 12:25:35 PM »
:lol I was curious what you guys were gonna say but yea, I think S&A is their best album. It was the first full Rush album I listened to and the one I listen to most now.

This is tough because Rush's best album, Snakes & Arrows, doesn't fit into these decades, I'll go with 70s

 :eek :eek

Kinda early to be drinking on a Sunday, no? :P

I took a double to get the courage to post my take here

Haha, all good!

Despite my playful pun, Rush was so great that almost any album could be a fan's favorite. 

I was a big S& fan when it was first out, and truth be told, I still like it a lot; I just like almost every album of theirs more.

You are one of those Rush fan(atic)s who think Rush didn't make one WEAK album?  ;D


Offline King Postwhore

  • Couch Potato
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 59402
  • Gender: Male
  • Take that Beethoven, you deaf bastard!!
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #117 on: December 22, 2020, 12:27:29 PM »
A weak song here and there.  Yes.  A weak album......No.
I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down'.” - Bob Newhart
So wait, we're spelling it wrong and king is spelling it right? What is going on here? :lol -- BlobVanDam
"Oh, I am definitely a jackass!" - TAC

Online Stadler

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 43291
  • Gender: Male
  • Pointing out the "unfunny" since 2014!
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #118 on: December 22, 2020, 12:31:41 PM »
A weak song here and there.  Yes.  A weak album......No.

Other than Grace Under Pressure.

:)

Offline WildRanger

  • Posts: 1301
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #119 on: December 22, 2020, 12:35:23 PM »
A weak song here and there.  Yes.  A weak album......No.

By weak I mean below-average. I'd definitely put Rush, Test for Echo, Roll the Bones, Presto and Vapor Trails in that category. I think those 5 albums are not terrible, they do have 3 or 4 good tunes, but generally they're below-average by Rush standards.




Offline King Postwhore

  • Couch Potato
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 59402
  • Gender: Male
  • Take that Beethoven, you deaf bastard!!
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #120 on: December 22, 2020, 12:38:36 PM »
I look at their catalog compared to most other bands and they are the most constant band out there.  Look at Kiss, U2, these are both bands with longevity and I think they've made weak albums.  as an example (Hot In The Shade, Zooropa).  No Rush albums are ever that low in quality.
I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down'.” - Bob Newhart
So wait, we're spelling it wrong and king is spelling it right? What is going on here? :lol -- BlobVanDam
"Oh, I am definitely a jackass!" - TAC

Online hunnus2000

  • Posts: 1979
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #121 on: December 22, 2020, 12:38:48 PM »
A weak song here and there.  Yes.  A weak album......No.

Other than Grace Under Pressure.

:)

Whaaaat????  :omg:

GUP is a transformational album for Rush. Alex won Guitar Player's Guitarist of the Year award! You're daft man!  :omg:

Online Stadler

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 43291
  • Gender: Male
  • Pointing out the "unfunny" since 2014!
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #122 on: December 22, 2020, 01:20:04 PM »
I look at their catalog compared to most other bands and they are the most constant band out there.  Look at Kiss, U2, these are both bands with longevity and I think they've made weak albums.  as an example (Hot In The Shade, Zooropa).  No Rush albums are ever that low in quality.

What did I ever do to you?   :) :) :) :) :)

You are right with consistency, though, I'll give you that. There's not one album in the catalogue that was phoned in (I like HitS, but even I will admit it was cobbled together; much of the album is actually the band's demos with overdubs).

Online Stadler

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 43291
  • Gender: Male
  • Pointing out the "unfunny" since 2014!
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #123 on: December 22, 2020, 01:21:16 PM »
A weak song here and there.  Yes.  A weak album......No.

Other than Grace Under Pressure.

:)

Whaaaat????  :omg:

GUP is a transformational album for Rush. Alex won Guitar Player's Guitarist of the Year award! You're daft man!  :omg:

Funny enough, Alex's guitars are what I like best about that album.  It's really a textbook for him.  I just don't think the songs are strong, and it's by far Neil's worst drum sound on record.

Offline hefdaddy42

  • Et in Arcadia Ego
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 53045
  • Gender: Male
  • Postwhore Emeritus
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #124 on: December 22, 2020, 01:37:30 PM »
I look at their catalog compared to most other bands and they are the most constant band out there.  Look at Kiss, U2, these are both bands with longevity and I think they've made weak albums.  as an example (Hot In The Shade, Zooropa).  No Rush albums are ever that low in quality.
Not really much of a KISS fan, but I quite like Hot in the Shade, although my favorite KISS album is Revenge.
Hef is right on all things. Except for when I disagree with him. In which case he's probably still right.

Offline King Postwhore

  • Couch Potato
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 59402
  • Gender: Male
  • Take that Beethoven, you deaf bastard!!
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #125 on: December 22, 2020, 01:41:05 PM »
I look at their catalog compared to most other bands and they are the most constant band out there.  Look at Kiss, U2, these are both bands with longevity and I think they've made weak albums.  as an example (Hot In The Shade, Zooropa).  No Rush albums are ever that low in quality.
Not really much of a KISS fan, but I quite like Hot in the Shade, although my favorite KISS album is Revenge.

Revenge is up there for me as well.  HITS was a bunch of rough demos that they touched up and put out.  Compared to Animalize, it's a poor record.  The tour though was outstanding.  That was the tour they broke out old songs they hadn't played in a long time.
I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down'.” - Bob Newhart
So wait, we're spelling it wrong and king is spelling it right? What is going on here? :lol -- BlobVanDam
"Oh, I am definitely a jackass!" - TAC

Offline ThatOneGuy2112

  • Posts: 2227
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #126 on: December 22, 2020, 02:00:53 PM »
Even at their worst, I dont think Rush ever put out a bad album. Some weaker ones? Sure. But nothing Heaven & Earth or Open Your Eyes bad.

The worst they ever got was mediocre or just plain middling. Roll the Bones, Test for Echo, and Vapor Trails fall into that category for me. Maybe Snakes & Arrows as well.

A weak song here and there.  Yes.  A weak album......No.

Other than Grace Under Pressure.

:)

Whaaaat????  :omg:

GUP is a transformational album for Rush. Alex won Guitar Player's Guitarist of the Year award! You're daft man!  :omg:

Funny enough, Alex's guitars are what I like best about that album.  It's really a textbook for him.  I just don't think the songs are strong, and it's by far Neil's worst drum sound on record.

I find GUP has more highlights than not, and it has what's probably in my top 3 Rush songs ever with Between the Wheels. I guess tastes and all that; I find that the album has some of their strongest and most powerful songwriting.

Offline KevShmev

  • EZBoard Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 41963
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #127 on: December 22, 2020, 03:50:32 PM »
Most of side 2 of Grace Under Pressure isn't great, but the album still has Distant Early Warning (awesome), Afterimage (really, really good), Red Sector A (awesome, albeit better live), The Enemy Within (damn good) and Between the Wheels (killer), so I will stand firm behind it.

Online TAC

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 74441
  • Gender: Male
  • Arthritic Metal Horns
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #128 on: December 22, 2020, 04:56:15 PM »
Most of side 2 of Grace Under Pressure isn't great, but the album still has Distant Early Warning (awesome), Afterimage (really, really good), Red Sector A (awesome, albeit better live), The Enemy Within (damn good) and Between the Wheels (killer), so I will stand firm behind it.


Yes, it's basically an EP.
would have thought the same thing but seeing the OP was TAC i immediately thought Maiden or DT related
Winger Theater Forums........or WTF.  ;D
TAC got a higher score than me in the electronic round? Honestly, can I just drop out now? :lol

Offline KevShmev

  • EZBoard Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 41963
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #129 on: December 22, 2020, 05:28:50 PM »
Most of side 2 of Grace Under Pressure isn't great, but the album still has Distant Early Warning (awesome), Afterimage (really, really good), Red Sector A (awesome, albeit better live), The Enemy Within (damn good) and Between the Wheels (killer), so I will stand firm behind it.


Yes, it's basically an EP.

I wouldn't go that far, as I do like The Body Electric, Kid Gloves and Red Lenses, but I don't think any of them are essential. 

Offline SoundscapeMN

  • Posts: 6469
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #130 on: December 22, 2020, 10:00:05 PM »
Kid Gloves has always been a standout, other than I find it's a little short.

But it's amazing, when I 1st started mixing with Rush fans online in the 90's, every other user worshipped it and/or used it as a screen-name.

Offline HOF

  • Posts: 8696
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #131 on: December 22, 2020, 10:23:00 PM »
The only song that’s not good to great on Grace Under Pressure is Red Lenses, and I still find it enjoyable if I’m in the mood for that sort of thing.

Offline WildRanger

  • Posts: 1301
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #132 on: December 23, 2020, 02:30:47 AM »
Even at their worst, I dont think Rush ever put out a bad album. Some weaker ones? Sure. But nothing Heaven & Earth or Open Your Eyes bad.



What is Heaven & Earth?

Offline RoeDent

  • 2006 Time Magazine Person of the Year
  • Posts: 6035
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #133 on: December 23, 2020, 02:34:54 AM »
What is Heaven & Earth?

Yes's most recent studio album to date, from 2014.

Offline WildRanger

  • Posts: 1301
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #134 on: December 23, 2020, 02:41:09 AM »

The worst they ever got was mediocre or just plain middling. Roll the Bones, Test for Echo, and Vapor Trails fall into that category for me. Maybe Snakes & Arrows as well.


What about their debut? To me it sounds like a third-rate Led Zeppelin.


Offline ThatOneGuy2112

  • Posts: 2227
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #135 on: December 23, 2020, 06:57:21 AM »

The worst they ever got was mediocre or just plain middling. Roll the Bones, Test for Echo, and Vapor Trails fall into that category for me. Maybe Snakes & Arrows as well.


What about their debut? To me it sounds like a third-rate Led Zeppelin.



It's not essential to their discography by any means, but honestly I kinda like it. I know it's not a super original sound for the time, and half the tracklist is somewhat forgettable, but it does have some strong hooks. Take a Friend and Here Again are legitimately good tunes. And Working Man of course is great.

Online hunnus2000

  • Posts: 1979
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #136 on: December 23, 2020, 07:40:07 AM »
A weak song here and there.  Yes.  A weak album......No.

Other than Grace Under Pressure.

:)

Whaaaat????  :omg:

GUP is a transformational album for Rush. Alex won Guitar Player's Guitarist of the Year award! You're daft man!  :omg:

Funny enough, Alex's guitars are what I like best about that album.  It's really a textbook for him.  I just don't think the songs are strong, and it's by far Neil's worst drum sound on record.

Actually, I would rate Presto as their sonically worst album which I would include Neil's drums. Absolutely flat as a pancake.

Online Stadler

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 43291
  • Gender: Male
  • Pointing out the "unfunny" since 2014!
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #137 on: December 23, 2020, 09:57:54 AM »
Most of side 2 of Grace Under Pressure isn't great, but the album still has Distant Early Warning (awesome), Afterimage (really, really good), Red Sector A (awesome, albeit better live), The Enemy Within (damn good) and Between the Wheels (killer), so I will stand firm behind it.

Afterimage never clicked with me, frankly, and it's also got the horrid "Red Lenses" and not quite mediocre "Kid Gloves".  I do like "Distant Early Warning", "Red Sector A", and "The Body Electric" live, though, particularly when Neil plays it on his regular kit.

It's RSA that has the epitome moment of why I don't like the record though:  There's the moment when Geddy sings "I hear the sound of gunfire at the prison gates..." and there's this drum fill by the greatest drummer in modern rock that's like a wet noodle.
« Last Edit: December 23, 2020, 10:07:23 AM by Stadler »

Offline pg1067

  • Posts: 12536
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #138 on: December 23, 2020, 01:09:21 PM »
A weak album:




A weak song here and there.  Yes.  A weak album......No.

Other than Grace Under Pressure.

:)

Whaaaat????  :omg:

GUP is a transformational album for Rush.

You say that like it's a good thing....  They started transforming from excellent production and smart songwriting to...well...I've said enough what I think about GUP (although GUP >> POW >>>> HYF).


Most of side 2 of Grace Under Pressure isn't great, but the album still has Distant Early Warning (awesome), Afterimage (really, really good), Red Sector A (awesome, albeit better live), The Enemy Within (damn good) and Between the Wheels (killer), so I will stand firm behind it.

For me, it's DEW (good), TEW (excellent), Kid Gloves (good) and BTW (excellent).  The rest is skippable.
"There's a bass solo in a song called Metropolis where I do a bass solo."  John Myung

Offline King Postwhore

  • Couch Potato
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 59402
  • Gender: Male
  • Take that Beethoven, you deaf bastard!!
Re: Rush for the rest of your life: 70's vs 80's
« Reply #139 on: December 23, 2020, 01:30:44 PM »
HYF is light years better than my 2 examples of bad albums by other bands.  Ex: U2 - Zooropa, Kiss - Hot In The Shade.  Those are bad albums by bands.
I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down'.” - Bob Newhart
So wait, we're spelling it wrong and king is spelling it right? What is going on here? :lol -- BlobVanDam
"Oh, I am definitely a jackass!" - TAC