There are no odd meters in Stairway and to write it out that way is to make it far more complicated than it needs to be.
I couldn't disagree more (and that's not just because the photo you posted is a transcription of the song for piano - guitar sheet music is only written in treble clef). For starters, to put those first two notes on the 1 of a measure turns the prior measure into one of 7/8 (the photo you posted isn't at all accurate to the song for the prior measure). Trying to cram something that's not in 4/4 into 4/4 just because it's possible to make the math line up is monumentally confusing. At songsterr.com (a tablature site), there's a version of Metropolis Part 1 that has the 5's and 7's section written in 12/8. You CAN do it, and the math words, but it's just plain wrong. Why is it wrong? Because the feel is off. Same with Stairway. You can't convince me that the section in question is in 4/4 because 4/4 feels wrong.
By the way, let's be clear that, when Jimmy Page wrote the song, he almost certainly wasn't thinking at all about time signatures, and I'm quite confident that, when he played the song for Bonham, Bonzo didn't say, "so...is that just straight 4/4 or what?"
First of all it doesn't matter if it's transcribed for piano, guitar, or a trombone. We're talking about rhythm, not harmony, so the clef has no relevance. Second of all, I don't understand this bold part. 5:32 in Stairway, Page hits a chord that is held for 4 beats - a whole bar. At the bottom of the previous page in the book my picture comes from, it is a whole bar of one D major chord. Then the strumming comes in on the downbeat, exactly as it is in the transcription I posted. You say it's "trying to cram something that's not in 4/4 into 4/4" except... it is. While time signature transcriptions can be subjective, this is very clearly not a case of odd meter, and a case of syncopation instead. It might 'feel' wrong to you but I'm telling you, dude, it's in 4/4, whether Page was thinking of time signatures or not. Go play the song. He hits the bar, holds it for 4 beats, then comes in on the downbeat, and the entire section is in normal time. There is no 7/8 going on. In the transcription you shared, the guy hits the chord but only has it ringing for 3 beats and then goes into a flurry of time signature changes to end up back in 4/4 anyway exactly like the picture I shared. You're arguing for an unnecessarily complicated version of the writing, which is fine, but don't tell me 4/4 is *wrong* when it very clearly is not. Honestly I'm a little surprised you're so defensive on this one. You could write out a lot of 4/4 shit in various ways if you wanted to, that doesn't make it correct or easier to read, it literally makes it more complex than it needs to be whether it's easier to your eyes or not. You're just arguing for a method that clearly accents the syncopated riff on a written downbeat instead of the upbeat like it is.
Also, Metropolis is intentionally written to be loaded with odd time signatures, and there's SO much more subjectivity in rhythmically analyzing that piece, although I would argue if you just listen to the drums you could clearly tell which bars are which meter. Stairway is a very cut and dry song in common time. This ain't hard, but you've told me I'm wrong, and inaccurate, when in fact I'm not wrong, and 100% accurate to the song, right down to the timing of the chord you mistakenly identified as "not accurate to the song." What? No, seriously... how does 4/4 feel wrong? It's called syncopation.
EDIT: I'm sorry, dude, this bugs the hell out of me. You say I can't convince you but please, see the light.