To play Devil's Advocate a little more, if he was really the top goalie in the league for years, why didn't he win more than 1 Vezina? Heck, he was only All-NHL first team once and All-NHL second once, meaning only twice was he considered one of the top two goalies in the league that season.
As for better goalies than ever, not sure about that. Maybe there are good goalies, but there are less great ones, ones who have longevity. Since I started watching hockey, Roy, Brodeur and Hasek are the three best by a massive distance. Not sure who is 4th, but whoever it is is lagging by a margin to large too calculate.
Roy - 4 Cups, 3 Conn Smythes, 3 Vezinas
Brodeur - 3 Cups, 0 Conn Smythes, 4 Vezinas
Hasek - 2 Cups, 0 Conn Smythes, 6 Vezinas
Lundqvist - 0 Cups, 0 Conn Smythes, 1 Vezina
But it is probably unfair to compare him to the three best ever, so let's compare him to his peers from his own era.
Lundqvist - 0 Cups, 0 Conn Smythes, 1 Vezina
Price - 0 Cups, 0 Conn Smythes, 1 Vezina
Fleury - 3 Cups, 0 Conn Smythes, 1 Vezina
Bobrovsky - 0 Cups, 0 Conn Smythes, 2 Vezinas
Thomas - 1 Cup, 1 Conn Smythe, 2 Vezinas
Vasilevskiy - 2 Cups, 1 Conn Smythe, 1 Vezina
Quick - 2 Cups, 1 Conn Smythe, 0 Vezina
So, he really doesn't even stand out in his own era. Sure, there is more to it, but, again, I am not arguing that he is not a Hall of Famer, merely that he is not a lock.