Imagine if we had this much paranoia every normal flu season. There's a fine line between concern and paranoia.
20,000 have already died from the flu, but the media didn't fearmonger that statistic.
Bingo. And I get why some are pushing back on people making comparisons with the flu--yes, there are key differences. But the point is to contextualize the numbers, and it is staggering how many simply don't have/understand that context.
True, but then what is the appropriate response? Coronavirus can easily be seen as killing 20k....maybe even more.
So which is the appropriate response to a virus killing 20k? Is it the "apathy" like we have to the Flu, or the "panic" like we have with a new strain?
I guess it should be a bit more and less for both.I get there will be more "panic" with a new and unknown virus, as we don't know how bad it might get.
This is nothing new....it happens all the time with new threats, both medical and non.
Perhaps a stronger response to the Flu is needed, and less panic for Coronavirus. Maybe a stronger reaction/plan to Flu yearly would have us better prepared for the Coronavirus. IMO 20k being killed by flu being "normal" is just as bad as a "panic" with a very similar virus.
EDIT: and now that I am 50, just recovering from surgery, with an elderly Mom who recently had a stroke....the effects of something like the Flu or Coronavirus, have a bit of a new meaning to me nowadays. I couldn't give a fuck about the flu in my 20's or 30's.....inconvenience maybe in my 40's.....but now I can see where it could be devastating for some, and I feel that I need to think about others than just myself....hence me taking this a bit more seriously, and actually taking some precautions these past couple years.