Curt Schilling's general jack-assery and politics aside, I still wouldn't vote him into the hall of fame. He was a good pitcher, even really good for a handful of seasons, but he was never great, in my opinion.
He had very similar overall numbers to guys like Kevin Brown, Orel Hershiser, and Bob Welch (who I think were all better than Schilling and are not in the HoF) and even guys like Tim Hudson, who wasn't necessarily better, but I don't think stands a snowball's chance in hell of getting into the HoF.
I think Schilling is on the bubble, but what puts him over the edge for me were his post seasons in both Arizona and Boston. Legendary. Plus, he was runner up 3 times for the Cy Young.
And Philly. He was the 1993 NLCS MVP (in addition to his WS MVP with Arizona). Also, while you're not incorrect that
some of his numbers are similar to Brown, Hershiser and Welch (he had from 700-1,100 more strikeouts than any of those guys), his numbers compare favorably to some undeniable HOFers, particularly John Smoltz:
Schilling: 216 wins over 20 seasons. Smoltz: 213 wins over 21 seasons (several of which were very limited action)
Schilling: 3.46 ERA. Smoltz: 3.33 ERA
Schilling: 3,116 K over 3,261 IP. Smoltz: 3,084 K over 3,473 IP
Schilling: 127 ERA+. Smoltz: 125 ERA+
Schilling's postseason numbers: 11-2, 2.23 ERA and 120K in 133.1 IP. Smoltz's postseason numbers: 15-4, 2.67 ERA and 199K in 209.0 IP (plus 4 saves)
Over his career, Smoltz's teams had a .526 winning percentage, while Schilling's had a .499 winning percentage.
Other than Smoltz having 154 saves and having played on the best regular season team throughout the '90s, they're essentially the same guy. His numbers are very comparable to Roy Halladay (although I don't think he should have gotten in because he had no significant postseason resume) and Mike Mussina (who also shouldn't be in because he was not a very good postseason pitcher on teams that didn't win in the postseason). Yet no one questioned Smoltz getting in.
The list of guys that make no sense to me includes Larry Walker, Tim Raines, Barry Larkin and Phil Rizzuto.
Does A-Rod belong in the HOF?
In my view, he's in a different category than the other steroid guys because he tested positive -- twice -- AFTER the PED rules were put into place. That said, the games he played in were official games that counted, so I'd have a hard time leaving him out.
John Clayton the NFL writer is on the radio a lot here in Seattle. He is a member of the Writer's Wing of the NFL HoF and a current HoF voter. He has been talking recently about how the NFL HoF works. It is not based on individual ballots like MLB. The voters get in a room, or now on a Zoom call, and discuss each candidate. And while they may discuss their off-the-field behavior, they are not allowed to include anything off-the-field when casting their votes. That's the simplistic summary anyway. He went in to much more detail. I thought it was interesting, definitely more collaborative than the MLB HoF.
I didn't know about the process, but I did know that character was expressly not part of the NFL voting process. It's probably one reason why the annual debates about the baseball HOF don't plague the NFL.