Amazing. Having said that, "That's All" is one of my least favorite songs by any artist, ever. Hate that song.
Wrong. Objectively.
Hell...there are at least a couple songs on the list are that worse than "That's All."
If "by a couple", you mean "none", I agree wholeheartedly.
To be fair, it's my opinion only, but it just rubs me the wrong way (and by the way, I LOVE the album it's on).
What does the word "snub" mean? I'm really asking.
When Stadler wrote that Phill Collins "and Robert Fripp are the two largest snubs in the RnRHoF right now," he is pointing out that neither of them are in the RNRHOF, and he believes that is unreasonable/unfair/unjust. To say they have been "snubbed" is to say that they have been unjustly excluded. For what my opinion is worth, I can't see why Fripp would get in, except as a member of King Crimson. As for Collins, he's at least as deserving as any number of folks who have been inducted, but the RRHOF is a joke that includes innumerable inductees who never played a note of "rock and roll (e.g., Linda Ronstadt, Laura Nyro, NWA, etc.), so if you take precedent into account, then I suppose Collins should get in. On the other hand, if you don't take precedent into account, then I would not agree that Collins belongs in.
I think Fripp should be in because he's every bit the innovator and transcendent musician that the Hall ordinarily loves, ala Lou Reed. He almost single-handedly created a genre, and while that genre is despised by the Hall generally, he's got the sort of integrity that the Hall claims to look for. He's got the idiosyncracy of a Neil Young or a Peter Gabriel (with whom he's worked numerous times), which the Hall loves. Those guys are supposed to be the smartest, most knowledgeable of musical critics, and if they are, Fripp is everything they should be embracing. And yet...
As for Phil, he's one of only three artists to sell more than 100 million records as BOTH a solo artist and a member of a group, so his bona fides are set. He's played with everyone from Led Zeppelin to Jethro Tull to Sting to Peter Gabriel to... it's just a snub based on pettiness and personality than anything tangible.
As for his "1985", well, that's around the time he just got overexposed. The Live Aid thing, the acting thing, the hits thing (he started to make a name for the cheesy ballad, ala "One More Night", when that is perhaps the least indicative song on the record).