Here we go again. Yes it was a bad no-call, but THE BLUES BLEW A TWO GOAL LEAD TO TIE IT!!!!! Once again, blaming the refs for the team's failing to STOP THE OTHER TEAM!
There are two distinct issues.
The refs fucked up on that game-winning goal. That's an unarguable fact,
regardless of where one's rooting allegiance lies.
That the team that was on the wrong end of that fucked up (non-)call had opportunities to score more goals or prevent the winning team from scoring goals before that fucked up (non-)call (e.g., the Sharts blew a 2 goal lead) is a completely unrelated issue.
An inexcusably bad (non-)call needs to be called out for what it is, and minimizing the egregiousness of what happened by pointing out that the Blues had other opportunities in the game has nothing to do with it.
After the Blue Jackets scored a goal that went off the netting, there was some thought that the league would immediately fix these kind if scenarios.
Even Tuukka Rask mused that what would happen if this was OT in Game 7 of the finals.
I remember when that happened when the Red Wings scored on the Kings in a similar manner back in 2013 to tie the game late in the 3rd and eventually win it. That wasn't a fun day. They still hadn't changed it and make these kinds of goals reviewable since then? F'en joke.
You're talking about the goal where the puck bounced off the net behind the net and then off of Quick's back and into the net? That was lame, but it was an early regular season game, so not quite the same magnitude.