That's not bad tams. That's flawed teams. Good but flawed. Bad teams are Cavs & the Knicks.
Exactly. The Blazers have good talent, and a closer. Decent depth when fully healthy. They are a good team with flaws that hopefully advance to the WCF. The Cavs and the Knicks have almost no talent, certainly no franchise player, and those are BAD teams. The Blazers are talented and are gelling at the right time.
Ok, well just stop for a second because we're talking apples and oranges here. I don't disagree with anything you said. But you have to look at my post in context. Since a couple of years ago, I've been praising Portland. I don't remember the exact words I used, but I basically said that a couple of years ago, I had thought they could be the Warriors biggest competition in the west moving forward and that they were a legit threat. That's all on record. I'm not saying they are "terrible" in a vaccuum in relation to the entire NBA. But 2 years later, they have done NOTHING with what they had two years ago to step up and be the team they should have become. And among the west playoff teams (which is the context of JD's original post saying that he didn't understand why everyone was so down on this team that, in his mind, should be the "second coming"), they are near the bottom of the barrel. They ARE talented. And they ARE gelling at the right time (which is basically what I said a few posts above yours). But I didn't expect them to even make it out of the first round, and I'm surprised to find them in the WC finals (well,
sort of surprised--they were playing Denver, which seems to be a team that is equal parts "contender" and "pretender" on any given night).