Just curious what people think. Obviously, there are a lot of things that factor into this. 25 years later, with material that is as challenging as a lot of the I&W material, virtually ANY singer would struggle and not be able to sing certain parts true to how they were recorded on the album. Heck, the recorded versions of Another Day and Take the Time were virtually impossible to reproduce live even when James was in his prime.
I am basically of two minds on this. On one hand, I have no problem with them tuning down, changing melodies, adding jams and changing arrangements a bit, etc. to not only allow James to sing them all in a full set, but also to make them a bit fresh and exciting, since we've all heard most of these songs a LOT of times. But part of me feels like, "But it's the 25th anniversary! If they are celebrating an anniversary, they need to keep it reasonably true to the originals because that is what they are celebrating!" Ultimately, I think I fall more on the former side than the latter. But I still can't completely shake the latter either.
So, again, just curious what others think.