Author Topic: Ruth Wilson v Michelle Monaghan  (Read 1269 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TempusVox

  • Descendant of Primus
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5503
  • Gender: Male
Ruth Wilson v Michelle Monaghan
« on: April 18, 2017, 07:10:31 PM »
A friend of mine was over at the house last evening. We sat on the patio before a roaring fire, and shared some nice conversation, and most of a bottle of the Macallan. Our conversation at one point turned to the show Luther.  He and I discussed our mutual admiration about the actors, the characters, the production, and the story arc overall. I shared just how much I was in lust with Ruth Wilson on that show.  He agreed, but said he was more into Michelle Monaghan, who could be Ruth's twin sister (we decided you could throw Emma Stone into the mix for triplets). I think both women are simply gorgeous. I get it...some may not agree; but what say you DTF? Ruth or Michelle?
You don't HAVE a soul.You ARE a soul.You HAVE a body.
"I came here to drink milk and kick ass; and I just finished my milk."

Online gmillerdrake

  • Proud Father.....Blessed Husband
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 19206
  • Gender: Male
  • 1 Timothy 2:5
Re: Ruth Wilson v Michelle Monaghan
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2017, 07:15:42 PM »
Ruth is a hottie but I'm team Michelle all the way. I've had a 'thing' for her for some time. She just does it for me.
Without Faith.....Without Hope.....There can be No Peace of Mind

Online King Postwhore

  • Couch Potato
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 59402
  • Gender: Male
  • Take that Beethoven, you deaf bastard!!
Re: Ruth Wilson v Michelle Monaghan
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2017, 07:18:15 PM »
Michelle has softer features so she gets my vote.
I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down'.” - Bob Newhart
So wait, we're spelling it wrong and king is spelling it right? What is going on here? :lol -- BlobVanDam
"Oh, I am definitely a jackass!" - TAC

Offline soupytwist

  • Posts: 2738
  • Gender: Male
  • Star Trekkin
Re: Ruth Wilson v Michelle Monaghan
« Reply #3 on: April 19, 2017, 02:05:15 AM »
Ruth quite franky look filthy, in the good way - just something about her ooze sex appeal.   Michelle is a good looking lady no doubt but seems a bit milquetoast in comparison.

Offline Prog Snob

  • DT.net Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 16727
  • Gender: Male
  • In the end we're left infinitely and utterly alone
Re: Ruth Wilson v Michelle Monaghan
« Reply #4 on: April 19, 2017, 02:12:53 AM »
Michelle has a killer smile, so she gets my vote.

edit: Ok, there's no poll.

Offline Bolsters

  • Lost Boy
  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5487
  • Gender: Male
  • What a hell of a day to embrace disorder
Re: Ruth Wilson v Michelle Monaghan
« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2017, 02:25:29 AM »
Michelle.

Online hefdaddy42

  • Et in Arcadia Ego
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 53051
  • Gender: Male
  • Postwhore Emeritus
Re: Ruth Wilson v Michelle Monaghan
« Reply #6 on: April 19, 2017, 07:25:15 AM »
Neither one are my type, necessarily, but Ruth Wilson has the ability to exude sexiness when she wants.  That's an important quality.
Hef is right on all things. Except for when I disagree with him. In which case he's probably still right.

Offline MetalJunkie

  • EZBoard Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 6970
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ruth Wilson v Michelle Monaghan
« Reply #7 on: April 19, 2017, 10:55:22 PM »
Michelle`
Listen! Do you smell something?