Another interesting thing about semantics and language.
"trans" fats are considered bad... because it causes health problems, because they're unnatural.
"cis" fats are considered good... because they're healthy, because they're natural.
So wouldn't that mean using the term "transgender" is a microaggression because being one is... "unnatural"?
Then one has to ask, isn't being 'transgender" unnatural and they should seek psychiatric help?
Would we accept people who identify as a glass of orange juice? or identify as a wombat?
Probably not, you and I would call them crazy, or at least say something like "they're not playing with a full deck"
Doesn't mean I'm afraid of them, or that I can't be friends with them.
and using the term "cis" for "cisgender" is often used these days as a derogatory term, especially if the person the term is being used against is perceived as a conservative, Republican, white, male, and/or a Trump supporter, and since 2021, regardless of vaccine status. Hell, even if you're none of those things but disagree with ANYTHING the LGBTQA community espouses, you get called cisgender if you are straight.
Yet, "cis" is the term for "good" and "natural"... Funny how those terms get switched around..
That would mean "transphobic" means 'afraid of bad, unnatural things.'
No one uses the term "cisphobic" strangely enough.
So when you think about it, these prefixes shouldn't be used to describe anyone's gender or sexual preferences.