Checked out the first two episodes of SNW when it came out. I wanted to watch a current Star Trek while I'm still making my way through the 90's.
I talked my wife into starting it with me, she enjoys sci-fi but always felt like she's got way too much to catch up with to watch the other shows with me. However, this time I told her there's no way this is gonna need any background, it happens before TOS, so she was sold on it. Fuck that I know, after watching the first episode I found out the guy playing Pike has been on several Discovery episodes so we decided to watch Discovery as well, the previous deterrent to Discovery being my inability to stand Sasha's acting.
So we watched the first two episodes of SNW and the first 6 episodes of Discovery, before I had to travel for work again.
I've long been kinda confused when a Trekkie describes a Star Trek media as "Not really Star Trek", at some point I thought they meant something wasn't canon. I've seen that line used about several shows/movies but most commonly about DS9.
Now that I've seen the overwhelming positive response for SNW on social media, way surpassing Discovery, which I've heard more bad than good about from Trekkies, I feel like I may be closer to understanding what the line means.
You guys can correct me if I'm wrong; "Not really Star Trek", means:
- The seasons have an overarching story, hardcore Trekkies seem to prefer standalone episodes.
- It carries some negative views of the Federation.
- Contains dark themes and/or imagery.
- Absence, or scarcity, of themes and meanings that reflect on real world issues.
- It is not entirely focused on space exploration.
I did enjoy SNW, but I found Discovery to be vastly superior. SNW is a self-aware TOS. TOS was great for me cause it was a natural product of it's time in terms of the way the episodes were produced and the scripts were constructed. SNW felt like it was custom-made for the "Not really Star Trek" folks, which is not a bad thing at all, I'm an avid supporter of well-labored fan-service.
Another, or possibly the same, group of people I felt SNW was made for, are The Orville fans, people who wanted the new Star Trek shows to be more like The Orville, since The Orville closely followes TOS format with a decent layer of TNG on top. But while I love The Orville; I really don't want that much "funny" in Star Trek, every fuckin character is either witty or sets up another character to be witty. I remember Pike from the The Cage, he's not that.. Kirky? Hell even Kirk is not that Kirky! The Pike I remember was kinda broody, distant from the crew and spoke in ab almost militaristic tone. This fuckin guy is cozy as fuck! And the actor is 100% channeling some George Clooney, which makes matters worse heh
I almost asked my wife to inject me with an adrenaline shot through the heart cause I almost overdosed on retcon, dangerous drug. There's easily more retconning in SNW than the Metal Gear Solid series, which previously held the title for most in-your face retconning. Again, not bad, since it still all falls in line with what we know from TOS. I kinda like the idea of Pike is aware of his fate from The Menagerie.
I'd talk a bit of Discovery but unfortunately I gotta go. But on a lighter quicker note, I do have to say there's something fundamentally "not Star Trek" about it, other than the points from above, which is that in Star Trek we had agreed that ALL ALIEN RACES SPEAK ENGLISH.. universal translator goes to English whether the aliens are around Earth folk or not, that is my MY STAR TREK! The only time I ever wanna hear someone speaking in Klingon is when Picard is yelling at a Klingon in Klingon, that's about it.
I'm kidding of course, I thought the language stunt was pretty neat.
They also took away the Klingon's beautiful luscious hair and unreasonable power structure, bull shit. Even Klingon women went to shit, remember the Duras sisters? easily the hottest thing I've ever seen on Star Trek, new female Klingons are.. meh.