That said, Kim defending Jimmy to Chuck was awesome.
It is interesting. Although not the same, I had a similar dilemma a few years ago.
Party A - the wronged (Chuck)
Party B - possibly tied up in the wrong, but not the direct cause - I cared about Party B. (Office store employee)
Party C - the wrongdoer. Not only do I not care about them, I despise them. (Jimmy)
Party D - Another person pitted against Party A via Party B (Kim)
Me - The other Kim, different reaction.
Party A shows up to discuss what Party C did and brought up the Party B connection. I felt empathy for Party A, but didn't want to just take down Party C unless Party B could be taken out of the equation. For the most part, I remained neutral and as quiet as the discussion would allow.
Party D pulled the Kim and instead started to attack Party A with the "really, this is your own fault." The entire time D and A started yelling at each other all I could do is think quietly on the side was "shut up D. This is literally two wrongs trying to make a right." It was not a fun experience and I didn't think "you go girl" with Party D's actions. Now if Party D truly was deceived, that's a different story. But they made it clear Kim was never confused as to whether Party Jimmy was guilty or not.
It would have been better if she stuck to "Well. There is no definitive proof here, so I'm withholding judgment of either party for the time being."
Bad TV though, because this is all a part of Kim's journey as well. She definitely stopped being the moral yet understanding anchor a few episodes ago. Right now, she's young Jimmy in his dad's liquor store with Jimmy being the scammer seducing her. She didn't just "break bad" immediately like impressionable young Jimmy, but she's started down that path.