it depends on how you rate things I suppose. If I was to average out the ratings on their discography then they wouldn't be (neither would Queensryche or DT in that case either) ,but based on the enjoyment and time I spent playing those top 3 especially ,then yeah. I had Headless Children in the top 10 in my DTF Top 50 and , with the "one album per band"rule , that was effectively my favourite album from each of the bands that have been the most important to me over a lifetime.
I think WASP cop a lot of undeserved crap because of the shock rock side of things - the songs on those top 3 albums stand right up there for me. They may not have the overall songwriting chops of an Iron Maiden or DT but when it comes to enjoyment , very few bands (or voices) get me like the best material from WASP.
OK, this is very interesting because this is a timely topic for me as I've been grappling with this recently. The dilemma is how would one ultimately rate a band when "most" of their material doesn't appeal to me, but the minority is some of the best material I've ever heard.
A few bands for me are Rush, Queensryche, and Metallica that I'm not sure where to rank.
If I did a Top 10 list that included these bands, I'd have to rank them as:
pre Signals Rush
pre Load Metallica
pre Promised Land Queensryche
Seems kind of strange because for Rush, that's only 10 years of a 40 year career. For Metallica that's 10 years of an almost 35 year career.
And for Queensryche, well that speaks for itself.
In totality, I don't think I could rate any of them in my Top 10, yet as Brent says: "very few bands (or voices) get me
like the best material from......"
How do I balance out the mediocre material from bands with longevity? Do I count it against them? How can I rate Rush in my Top 10 when I really haven't cared for much of what they've done for the past 30 years yet the run on 2112-MP is one of the most influential eras of music for me, and some of my favorite music of all time?
Another band that would make my Top 10 is Kiske era Helloween, yet Helloween (in totality) would not. I hate that I would have to qualify half of the bands on my Top 10, and if I have to do that, do they really belong in the first place?
What do you guys think?
Oh and Brent, WASP was #11 on your list, so not a Top 10 band!