Author Topic: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation  (Read 259185 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3255 on: August 04, 2016, 04:20:30 AM »
Whiskey.

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3256 on: August 04, 2016, 04:23:06 AM »
They probably only have the fake synthehol stuff anyway.
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3257 on: August 04, 2016, 04:30:13 AM »
Snythsky

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3258 on: August 04, 2016, 04:32:08 AM »
Ensign Snythsky? The Russian guy?
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline King Postwhore

  • Couch Potato
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 59671
  • Gender: Male
  • Take that Beethoven, you deaf bastard!!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3259 on: August 04, 2016, 04:41:28 AM »
Friends don't let friends drink and drive a wessel.
I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down'.” - Bob Newhart
So wait, we're spelling it wrong and king is spelling it right? What is going on here? :lol -- BlobVanDam
"Oh, I am definitely a jackass!" - TAC

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3260 on: August 04, 2016, 05:03:18 AM »
Holo-hol :rollin




" Try new Holo-Hol ! You'll think you're actually drinking Alcohol !"





* leaves you with same empty feeling inside.

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30843
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3261 on: August 04, 2016, 08:35:43 AM »
Worst character would have to be Neelix of Troi. They're both pretty hard to stomach. At least Neelix was occasionally pretty funny. Troi was never any good. Even when they had decent stories for her, turning her into a Romulan for example, she was still pretty bad.

And I also preferred Pulaski, simply for the reason that she had spirit. As I've always stated, my problem with the TNG crew were that they had no soul. While she was a bitch more often than not, at least that qualifies as personality. I also consider Diana Muldaur a much better actor than McFadden.


Well apart from the fucked up grooming of Kes,
This really made me LOL.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline King Postwhore

  • Couch Potato
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 59671
  • Gender: Male
  • Take that Beethoven, you deaf bastard!!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3262 on: August 04, 2016, 08:56:51 AM »
The 1st season of TNG, I couldn't stand Troi.  They did flush out her character better as the seasons went on.
I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down'.” - Bob Newhart
So wait, we're spelling it wrong and king is spelling it right? What is going on here? :lol -- BlobVanDam
"Oh, I am definitely a jackass!" - TAC

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30843
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3263 on: August 04, 2016, 09:27:15 AM »
They did flush out her character
Oh, if only.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline King Postwhore

  • Couch Potato
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 59671
  • Gender: Male
  • Take that Beethoven, you deaf bastard!!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3264 on: August 04, 2016, 09:29:09 AM »
 :lol

THE PAAAAIIINNNN!!!!
I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down'.” - Bob Newhart
So wait, we're spelling it wrong and king is spelling it right? What is going on here? :lol -- BlobVanDam
"Oh, I am definitely a jackass!" - TAC

Offline Orbert

  • Recovering Musician
  • EZBoard Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 19369
  • Gender: Male
  • In and around the lake
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3265 on: August 04, 2016, 09:55:24 AM »
Maybe that's what she needed, a good flushing.  If anyone could give it to her, I'd've thought it would be Riker, but I guess not.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3266 on: August 04, 2016, 12:09:07 PM »
" The Game "

God I *HATE* fake laughing but the intro to this episode is beyond annoying.










Also :






I've always wondered what the windows on the underside of the saucer are for. There's no windows on the floor. I wondered if the bottom of the dish had reverse gravity and it's actually the roof.

Otherwise they're very much on the floor.
« Last Edit: August 04, 2016, 12:14:40 PM by Kotowboy »

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30843
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3267 on: August 04, 2016, 12:51:31 PM »
I've always wondered what the windows on the underside of the saucer are for. There's no windows on the floor. I wondered if the bottom of the dish had reverse gravity and it's actually the roof.

Otherwise they're very much on the floor.
If you're referring to the ones above the phaser ring, it looks like those are angled. Haven't we seen plenty of angle windows before? Or, maybe they just thought it looked cool and didn't give it another thought.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3268 on: August 04, 2016, 12:55:11 PM »
Or, maybe they just thought it looked cool and didn't give it another thought.

::) JJ.....Typical. Design over function. . .



Oh wait.

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30843
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3269 on: August 04, 2016, 01:28:13 PM »
Not sure what the eye roll is for.


Oh, wait.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3270 on: August 04, 2016, 01:28:58 PM »
No you really don't.

Offline chknptpie

  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3770
  • Gender: Female
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3271 on: August 04, 2016, 02:25:12 PM »
Quick google found this


Those look like downward facing windows? Not at an extreme angle, but look downward to me.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3272 on: August 04, 2016, 02:42:37 PM »
Pretty much run out of non - Klingon / Worfs brother / birthright YAWN episodes of TNG

So started Voyager.

Offline Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36354
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3273 on: August 04, 2016, 02:45:28 PM »
Quick google found this


Those look like downward facing windows? Not at an extreme angle, but look downward to me.

That looks like DS9.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3274 on: August 04, 2016, 02:47:32 PM »
Yes. Enterprise D doesn't have windows like that or doors.

Offline chknptpie

  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3770
  • Gender: Female
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3275 on: August 04, 2016, 02:49:54 PM »
It is DS9 - however, the design can be applied to starships.

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30843
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3276 on: August 04, 2016, 02:50:06 PM »
Ten-forward has the same downward sloping windows. Which is odd since they should go the opposite direction, being on the top of the saucer and all. I'm pretty sure I've seen other similarly sloped windows, which I think is what KTB was asking about.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline chknptpie

  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3770
  • Gender: Female
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3277 on: August 04, 2016, 02:51:49 PM »
Captain Picard's quarters appear to have upward facing windows



Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3278 on: August 04, 2016, 02:54:30 PM »
Maybe his is on the top of the dish.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3279 on: August 04, 2016, 03:49:51 PM »
Oh I just remembered. Voyager is the series that has really abrupt endings.

" Phew we did it. "

THE END


They're probably not all like that but I love a little epilogue before the episode ends.

Offline Progmetty

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 7129
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3280 on: August 04, 2016, 09:53:04 PM »
Speaking of endings, I watched the TNG episode Justice that ends with Picard telling Riker to "take us out of here, Number One", to which Riker responds enthusiastically "Gladly, sir" then proceeds to sit in his chair with a promising smile, says and does absolutely nothing pertaining to that order then the episode ends :lol
I laughed harder than I should have at that heh
I wouldn't want somebody with 18 kids to mow my damn lawn, based on a longstanding bias I have against crazy fucks.

Offline Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36354
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3281 on: August 04, 2016, 09:58:00 PM »
Oh I just remembered. Voyager is the series that has really abrupt endings.

" Phew we did it. "

THE END


They're probably not all like that but I love a little epilogue before the episode ends.

I think that only really bothered me on the finale.

"WE MADE IT HOME"

-credits-
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3282 on: August 04, 2016, 11:19:18 PM »
Ten-forward has the same downward sloping windows. Which is odd since they should go the opposite direction, being on the top of the saucer and all. I'm pretty sure I've seen other similarly sloped windows, which I think is what KTB was asking about.

Ten forward was always the lower half of the saucer rim, which is why they made the rim thicker on the 4ft model, because the 6ft wasn't designed with ten forward's height in mind for that section.
They only had a couple of sets for the other regular rooms, which is why you never see much variety in gradients on the windows, and you'd see how silly and impractical the ultra raked windows would look in reality.
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline soupytwist

  • Posts: 2773
  • Gender: Male
  • Star Trekkin
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3283 on: August 05, 2016, 05:07:27 AM »
When I rewatched TNG the then that struck me was how little The Borg were in the series - I think they feature in about 6 episodes in total of the 178 made.   You would have thought after the success of 'The Best of Both Worlds' that they'd pop up far more.  I think there may well be more Lwaxana episodes than Borg ones...

Offline Polarbear

  • Posts: 1504
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3284 on: August 05, 2016, 06:36:47 AM »
When I rewatched TNG the then that struck me was how little The Borg were in the series - I think they feature in about 6 episodes in total of the 178 made.   You would have thought after the success of 'The Best of Both Worlds' that they'd pop up far more.  I think there may well be more Lwaxana episodes than Borg ones...

I'm happy that they didn't overuse the Borg in TNG. If they had Borg invading Federation every season, it wouldn't make sense. Also the borg stories in TNG after TBoBW, were really hit or miss. I liked 'I Borg' while 'Descent' was awful.

My favorite borg story after 'Best of Both Worlds' is 'Dark Frontier' in Voyager.

Offline Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36354
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3285 on: August 05, 2016, 06:59:39 AM »
When I rewatched TNG the then that struck me was how little The Borg were in the series - I think they feature in about 6 episodes in total of the 178 made.   You would have thought after the success of 'The Best of Both Worlds' that they'd pop up far more.  I think there may well be more Lwaxana episodes than Borg ones...

I'm happy that they didn't overuse the Borg in TNG. If they had Borg invading Federation every season, it wouldn't make sense. Also the borg stories in TNG after TBoBW, were really hit or miss. I liked 'I Borg' while 'Descent' was awful.

My favorite borg story after 'Best of Both Worlds' is 'Dark Frontier' in Voyager.

See, I consider the Descent episodes to be more Data/Lore episodes than Borg episodes, especially considering it's not the Borg collective, and the Borg could have easily been replaced with.....any one else at all and it wouldn't have made a lick of difference in the episode.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30843
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3286 on: August 05, 2016, 08:17:49 AM »
Speaking of endings, I watched the TNG episode Justice that ends with Picard telling Riker to "take us out of here, Number One", to which Riker responds enthusiastically "Gladly, sir" then proceeds to sit in his chair with a promising smile, says and does absolutely nothing pertaining to that order then the episode ends :lol
I laughed harder than I should have at that heh
Justice could have been so much better than it actually was. The premise was excellent and that part of the episode (somebody needs to be executed in accordance with the prime directive) was nicely done. One of the rare examples of when making Wesley a focal point was a good move. The problem was that the people were pretty goofy and the inclusion of their God was silly and unnecessary. It's also one of the few times Picard tells a society to fuck off, not quite so in accordance with the prime directive.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3287 on: August 06, 2016, 12:12:58 PM »
Voyager : " Parallax ".

Just started. I've seen a lot of episodes of VOY but never seen it all the way through.

Offline Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36354
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3288 on: August 06, 2016, 12:28:57 PM »
Voyager : " Parallax ".

Just started. I've seen a lot of episodes of VOY but never seen it all the way through.

I really like Voyager. The main problems are a good amount of awful episodes, and with rare exception, most of the crew has almost no major character development over the 7 years.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3289 on: August 06, 2016, 12:41:51 PM »
S1 has the advantage of not being as horrendously 80s as TNG S1