Author Topic: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation  (Read 256364 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline PowerSlave

  • Posts: 2134
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3325 on: August 13, 2016, 03:28:46 AM »

And I hear that Andorian apples are the tastiest.

I'm picturing a blue apple with not one, but two separate stems sticking out of it.
All of this has happened before and all of this will happen again

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3326 on: August 13, 2016, 09:34:31 AM »

And I hear that Andorian apples are the tastiest.

I'm picturing a blue apple with not one, but two separate stems sticking out of it.

My fave thing about post TNG Trek is that any device has to have flashing lights on it and any beverage has to be a luminous colour because future :lol

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3327 on: August 13, 2016, 03:26:26 PM »
Cold Fire...

" Kes - according to our scans..."

Me - *thinking* " the station is 300 years old...

" The station is 300 years old "

 :o WTF ?!

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3328 on: August 14, 2016, 01:55:00 PM »
Intro to " Prototype " VOY S2 E13 is so RoboCop.

Janeway shoulda said " I love this guy ! "


" Meld "

Hmmmm a crewmember is dead. Who could it be ??

Tuvok ? Janeway ? Kim ? Paris or crewman Brad Dourif who we've never seen before ? :biggrin:



" Dreadnought "

" When a Bomb starts talking I get nervous "

Haha. Dark Star ref ?


Oh For fuck's sake....No wrap up ? Bomb goes off. Credits.







« Last Edit: August 14, 2016, 03:27:49 PM by Kotowboy »

Offline soupytwist

  • Posts: 2754
  • Gender: Male
  • Star Trekkin
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3329 on: August 15, 2016, 05:46:35 AM »
So I was at home with a Ill last night, flicking though Netflix and came across a Star Trek documentary called 'The Captains' in which The Shat goes and interviews all the other Star Trek Captains.  It was mostly pretty dull but Avery Brooks is now(?) batshit mental, seriously his interview with Shat is full blown amazing.   The interview is Shat talking to Brooks who is on his piano, he basically ignores any question Shat asks and just plays Jazz making up lyrics full of cod-wisdom, and seems to not be speaking linear!   In the end Shat joins in (seriously) and we end up with this utterly surreal jazz duet. 

I honestly can't tell if ...

- Brooks was just trolling the Shat.
- He is just totally out there.
- He was on LSD.
- The Prophets really did fuck with his mind.

Either way it make strangely compelling and cringeworthy viewing.

Offline soupytwist

  • Posts: 2754
  • Gender: Male
  • Star Trekkin
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3330 on: August 15, 2016, 05:47:27 AM »
Double post.
« Last Edit: August 15, 2016, 05:56:30 AM by soupytwist »

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3331 on: August 15, 2016, 06:02:12 AM »
I'm pretty sure Brooks was off his face in that interview. It was the only part of that doco I didn't like. Everyone else was great.
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline soupytwist

  • Posts: 2754
  • Gender: Male
  • Star Trekkin
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3332 on: August 15, 2016, 06:14:50 AM »
I'm pretty sure Brooks was off his face in that interview. It was the only part of that doco I didn't like. Everyone else was great.

Thought Mulgrew came across a bit defensive, but there again some of Shat's questions were a bit odd in their interview.

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3333 on: August 15, 2016, 06:17:29 AM »
Been a while since I watched it, but I don't remember getting that vibe from Mulgrew. I felt she was very honest and open though, which I liked. Bakula was cool too.
And nothing needs to be said about Shat and Stewart.
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline soupytwist

  • Posts: 2754
  • Gender: Male
  • Star Trekkin
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3334 on: August 15, 2016, 07:43:14 AM »
Been a while since I watched it, but I don't remember getting that vibe from Mulgrew. I felt she was very honest and open though, which I liked. Bakula was cool too.
And nothing needs to be said about Shat and Stewart.

Stewart came across better than he often can do.   Yeah Bakula seemed like a decent bloke, but he's aww shucks personality problem explains why he seemed a lot more comfortable as Sam Beckett but a rather then Cap't Archer.   Chris Pine came across pretty well, although he wasn't in it as much as the others.

Offline hefdaddy42

  • Et in Arcadia Ego
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 53186
  • Gender: Male
  • Postwhore Emeritus
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3335 on: August 16, 2016, 10:54:41 AM »
I thought The Captains was really good, and very interesting.

The Brooks segment was my favorite part  :lol
Hef is right on all things. Except for when I disagree with him. In which case he's probably still right.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3336 on: August 16, 2016, 03:17:36 PM »
Star Trek Voyager : Lifesigns.

This episode is interest...OH ITS THAT FUCKING POOL HALL *AGAIN*




I had a thought about Encounter At Farpoint. When Wes fell in the river in the holodeck - shouldn't he be dry immediately after he left ? Or are some things real in there and the rest is a projection ?
« Last Edit: August 16, 2016, 03:30:20 PM by Kotowboy »

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3337 on: August 16, 2016, 03:49:28 PM »
Voyager " Investigations ".

Wow - a two minute single take in the opening. Pretty Impressive.

Online Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36209
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3338 on: August 16, 2016, 04:09:51 PM »
Star Trek Voyager : Lifesigns.

This episode is interest...OH ITS THAT FUCKING POOL HALL *AGAIN*




I had a thought about Encounter At Farpoint. When Wes fell in the river in the holodeck - shouldn't he be dry immediately after he left ? Or are some things real in there and the rest is a projection ?

Honestly, it depends on how much thought you want to give that stuff. The holodeck was always considered a mixture of holograms and replicator technology, which is why if someone eats in the holodeck, they're actually eating food that has essentially been replicated there. So you could argue that the water was replicated and thus real.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Online El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30702
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3339 on: August 16, 2016, 04:46:05 PM »
The problem is that the Moriarty episode pretty much blows that out of the water. They were very clear that holodeck matter loses cohesion after it leaves the holodeck. Picard demonstrated with a book, as I recall, so it wasn't just the Moriarty character that's effected.

And now that he brought it up, the whole The Naked Now thing started after Wesley hit Picard with a holographic snowball, also outside the HD.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Online Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36209
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3340 on: August 16, 2016, 04:50:03 PM »
The problem is that the Moriarty episode pretty much blows that out of the water. They were very clear that holodeck matter loses cohesion after it leaves the holodeck. Picard demonstrated with a book, as I recall, so it wasn't just the Moriarty character that's effected.

And now that he brought it up, the whole The Naked Now thing started after Wesley hit Picard with a holographic snowball, also outside the HD.

Like I said, they explained it as a mixture of holograms and replicated material. It just so happens the books were holograms, but they easily could have been replicated and then would be able to leave the holodeck.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3341 on: August 17, 2016, 12:35:06 PM »
If I was pitching ideas for Discovery - i'd love to overturn the cliches of the previous 4 series.

" Sir ! Someone is stealing a shuttle ! "

" Lock on tractor beam ! "

" Got him. Bringing it back now. "

Cut to The Brig. :rollin






Moriarty : You cannot leave the holodeck. I am in control

Officer : Computer - End Program.

* Program ends - crew leave *

:rollin

Online El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30702
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3342 on: August 17, 2016, 06:41:15 PM »
I thought the Moriarty episode was excellent. The first one with Data as Holmes was pretty weak. (And on a side note, Data walked out of the holodeck carrying a piece of holographic paper.) The premise, the multiple mindfucks and the resolution of SiaB were all quite good.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Online Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36209
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3343 on: August 17, 2016, 06:42:57 PM »
I also liked their portrayal of Moriarty. He wasn't a pure villain or anything and you could really empathize with him.

fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline abydos

  • DT.net
  • Posts: 3753
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3344 on: August 17, 2016, 10:22:14 PM »
https://www.startrek.com/article/bryan-fuller-reveals-discovery-details

Eehh... doesn't inspire confidence but I will still give it a fair shot.

Offline jammindude

  • Posts: 15305
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3345 on: August 19, 2016, 07:44:35 PM »
I'm watching the episode with that DAHM CAHNDLE!!!!   ;D
"Better the pride that resides in a citizen of the world.
Than the pride that divides when a colorful rag is unfurled." - Neil Peart

The Jammin Dude Show - https://www.youtube.com/user/jammindude

Offline PowerSlave

  • Posts: 2134
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3346 on: August 20, 2016, 03:32:55 AM »
I'm watching the episode with that DAHM CAHNDLE!!!!   ;D

BBC America? It was on when i got home from work. Yep, it's bad.
All of this has happened before and all of this will happen again

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3347 on: August 21, 2016, 08:21:49 AM »
HAHAHA.  ;D ;D ;D


" In Star Trek 4 - The crew of the Enterprise go back in time in a vehicle which previously belonged to Christopher Lloyd ".

Online El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30702
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3348 on: August 21, 2016, 11:32:29 PM »
watched a couple of early Seven episode of voyager (Day of Honor, The Raven). Seems like there was a run where Seven was much softer than usual. At first she was 100% Borg. But then she started to come to grips with being Anneke Hanson and talked with a good deal of humanity. She was inquisitive and very unsure of herself. Gave her a real vulnerability. Not too long after she just turned cyborg and spoke with the same demeanor as a highly condescending Tuvak. Any vulnerability was replaced by supreme arrogance. Shame that didn't last a bit longer. They could have spent a whole season with her trying to learn the ropes. They moved pretty quickly into the adversarial role.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3349 on: August 22, 2016, 04:27:04 PM »
I'm watching several eps of Voyager a day and Kes always sounds overdubbed.

Online Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36209
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3350 on: August 22, 2016, 04:30:16 PM »
I'm watching several eps of Voyager a day and Kes always sounds overdubbed.

Really? I've never noticed that.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Online Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36209
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3351 on: August 22, 2016, 04:46:02 PM »
Apparently Shatner has apologized for Star Trek V.

Not for how bad it was, mind you, but for running out of money and not including fire shooting rock monsters that he had wanted.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3352 on: August 22, 2016, 04:48:38 PM »
Nearly up to S4 of Voyager.

After Voyager i'll watch Enterprise as it's only short and then DS9 finally.

Online Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36209
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3353 on: August 22, 2016, 04:52:25 PM »
Nearly up to S4 of Voyager.

After Voyager i'll watch Enterprise as it's only short and then DS9 finally.

While I don't have the same distaste for seasons 1 and 2 of Enterprise, it gets realllllly good in season 3. Of course my version of really good and yours might be different. Season 3 is quite dark and largely focused on a single story. Not a lot of fun or light hardheartedness in it.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3354 on: August 22, 2016, 04:56:15 PM »
I have seen some eps.

I actually like the augment trilogy although I thought it was a bit of a stretch trying to retcon Dr. Noonien Soong being the creator of Khan.

Online Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36209
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3355 on: August 22, 2016, 04:59:34 PM »
I have seen some eps.

I actually like the augment trilogy although I thought it was a bit of a stretch trying to retcon Dr. Noonien Soong being the creator of Khan.

Well, the names work. Noonien Soong, Khan Noonien Singh.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3356 on: August 22, 2016, 05:02:11 PM »
Like I said. Retcon.

Roddenberry came up with those names IRL to try to find a friend by that name.

Online Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36209
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3357 on: August 22, 2016, 05:03:47 PM »
Like I said. Retcon.

Roddenberry came up with those names IRL to try to find a friend by that name.

Yup! But pretty much everything that links Enterprise to any other show is retcon anyway. It's the problem with prequel series.

Assuming Discovery tries to tie in with any other series of ST, you'll be seeing tons of it.

fanticide.bandcamp.com

Online El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30702
  • Bad Craziness
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3358 on: August 22, 2016, 06:15:29 PM »
The plot thickens. Janeway is on the holodeck sopping wet, and then hauls ass to the bridge, as they've come under attack, where she arrives dry, hair neatly coiffed.

Nearly up to S4 of Voyager.

After Voyager i'll watch Enterprise as it's only short and then DS9 finally.

While I don't have the same distaste for seasons 1 and 2 of Enterprise, it gets realllllly good in season 3. Of course my version of really good and yours might be different. Season 3 is quite dark and largely focused on a single story. Not a lot of fun or light hardheartedness in it.
Once I actually looked at all of the episodes I figured out that season three has about the same ratio of good/bad episodes as any other season. A lot of it is just standalone episodes with little or no link to the Xindi arc, and in some cases they're the absolute bottom of the barrel. The Western, the mutants and the Beauty and the Beast episode might well be the worst of the entire series. It also had too many different plot angles happening (the sphere builders thing was just too much). It probably was the best of the 4 seasons, by virtue of the standouts, but I don't consider it all that much better than the others.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: Star Trek: The Next Threaderation
« Reply #3359 on: August 24, 2016, 10:07:07 AM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUn3ZxYmE6c

If Yesterday's Enterprise was a movie.


I think a few of the episodes could have been movies. We should have had All Good Things as the swan song instead of Nemesis.