Author Topic: Official grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc. rant thread v. I hate you, Nirvana  (Read 4997 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bosk1

  • King of Misdirection
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12827
  • Bow down to Boskaryus
We have these threads every once in awhile where we post that one mistake that drives us nuts and drives us to rant and baselessly try to make ourselves sound superior to all those poor, illiterate fools who get it wrong.

My peeve of the day:  "Never mind" is two words.  It isn't "nevermind."  I hate you so much, Kurt Cobain for singlehandedly convincing half the English speaking world to unwittingly spell it incorrectly.  I hate you so much.
"The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie."

Offline black_biff_stadler

  • 6th place finalist at New Orleans Skullet Fest 2010
  • DT.net Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13848
  • Gender: Male
  • blackwater_floyd, get it?
Eh. Compound words as well as much of the English language are based on very arbitrary rules that are incessantly contradicted. Nevermind the bollocks, here are the grammar nazis!
Users who've sigged me (Join today!): LCArenas, Jakartabassplayer, LeeHarveyKennedy, Global Laziness, Portrucci, obscure, FlyingBIZKIT, alirocker08, senecadawg2, DebraKadabra, JayOctavarium, Cedar redaC, (almost) bout to crash, ? (the forum member, not the fucking punctuation mark), Zeltar, lonestar, ASacrificedSon

Offline Implode

  • Lord of the Squids
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 5821
  • Gender: Male
Every day vs everyday is probably the most common mistake I see. You see it wrong on billboards all the time.

Offline Perpetual Change

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 12264
English is a terrible language for hard 'n fast grammar rules. For that, you need French. Compound words don't bother me. They're already implicitly acceptable in most cases.

I really hate apostrophes on proper nouns that already end with S.

Jesus', Moses', Ravens', etc.

Easily one of my least favorite nuances of the English language.


Offline Dimitrius

  • DT.net Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18218
  • Gender: Male
  • Fuckin' magnets, how do they work?
I hate Nirvana for being shit music, but grammar's fine too.
Joe and I in the same squad is basically the virtual equivalent of us plowing a rape van through an elementary school playground at recess.

Offline Zook

  • Evil Incarnate
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 14161
  • Gender: Male
  • Take My Hand
I didn't develop that grammatical error from that shit hole band.

Offline Chino

  • Be excellent to each other.
  • DT.net Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 25330
  • Gender: Male
Saw this on Instagram yesterday...


Offline Zook

  • Evil Incarnate
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 14161
  • Gender: Male
  • Take My Hand
Saw this on Instagram yesterday...



With the world full of lazy people who have to abbreviate words as little as four letters, it puzzles me why anyone would take the time to type like that. It looks obnoxious and I can't imagine it being all that fun to type.

Offline Bolsters

  • Lost Boy
  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5488
  • Gender: Male
  • What a hell of a day to embrace disorder
My extremely aggravating pet peeve at the moment: "would of" "could of" "should of" and the like. How the fuck could someone be so stupid as to think these words together make any sense? They must have absolutely no idea how to use the word "of" or even the meaning of the word if they think this is even remotely correct, because sentences with "could of" make absolutely zero sense. And have they no knowledge of the word "have" at all? :censored

The most annoying parts are: that this is becoming extremely prevalant, I see it on internet forums, on Facebook, everywhere, almost every day. That and it's usually always people who are primarily english-speaking doing this, and not people who learned english as a second language and have an excuse for things like this, which means that these people don't even understand their own, and in many cases only, language.

Offline KevShmev

  • EZBoard Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 41972
  • Gender: Male
My extremely aggravating pet peeve at the moment: "would of" "could of" "should of" and the like. How the fuck could someone be so stupid as to think these words together make any sense? They must have absolutely no idea how to use the word "of" or even the meaning of the word if they think this is even remotely correct, because sentences with "could of" make absolutely zero sense. And have they no knowledge of the word "have" at all? :censored

The most annoying parts are: that this is becoming extremely prevalant, I see it on internet forums, on Facebook, everywhere, almost every day. That and it's usually always people who are primarily english-speaking doing this, and not people who learned english as a second language and have an excuse for things like this, which means that these people don't even understand their own, and in many cases only, language.

This.  I almost never give friends crap for texting with bad spelling (since almost everyone abbreviates in texting), but a friend said "could of" in a text the other day and I gave her crap. I was like, "Come on, you are a college graduate, too; you should know better!!" :lol :lol

Offline theseoafs

  • When the lights go down in the city, and the sun shines on the bayyyyy
  • Posts: 5573
  • Gender: Male
  • Hello! My name is Elder Price
Dude, "could of" pisses me off. 

Offline Bolsters

  • Lost Boy
  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5488
  • Gender: Male
  • What a hell of a day to embrace disorder
inb4 people criticise me for beginning a sentence with "and" :facepalm: I should of re-read my post before posting.

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
We have these threads every once in awhile where we post that one mistake that drives us nuts and drives us to rant and baselessly try to make ourselves sound superior to all those poor, illiterate fools who get it wrong.

My peeve of the day:  "Never mind" is two words.  It isn't "nevermind."  I hate you so much, Kurt Cobain for singlehandedly convincing half the English speaking world to unwittingly spell it incorrectly.  I hate you so much.

As soon as I saw Nirvana in the thread title, I knew you were going to refer to that one. :lol I'll just add it to the incredible long list of reasons to hate Nirvana.

The most common typo I see on forums (that therefore bothers me most just by sheer numbers alone), is confusing their/there/they're.
Also, spelling 'definitely' as 'defiantly'. Whenever I see a sentence like "I defiantly want some ice cream!" I think, "well who are you defying? Why the need to be so rebellious just for ice cream?" How badly are you pronouncing 'definitely' that you could possibly think it's spelled like that?!

Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline alirocker08

  • Apparently not a hobbit
  • Posts: 1125
  • Gender: Female
  • 'Sup, I'm a very short elf
We had a debate about grammatical errors yesterday, whether they should be called errors and what this indicates about the English language in general. It's definitely an interesting debate.
ITT: We discover that Alice is elvish...
Psshh, your status as a hobbit has just been a cover. Your cover has been blown.

Offline robwebster

  • Posts: 5021
Tell you what, if we're collecting all our grammar nitpickery.

It astonishes me that Paul McCartney could make something as brilliant and inventive as Live and Let Die out of nothing, but couldn't turn "this ever-changing world in which we live in" into the significantly-less-redundant "this ever-changing world in which we're living." He'd already done 99% of the work! You barely even pronounce it differently. But, no! Sticks out as a terrible line in a great song. Arrrrgh!

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
English is a terrible language for hard 'n fast grammar rules. For that, you need French. Compound words don't bother me. They're already implicitly acceptable in most cases.

I really hate apostrophes on proper nouns that already end with S.

Jesus', Moses', Ravens', etc.

Easily one of my least favorite nuances of the English language.

This is one of mine too. People put an apostrophe at the end of a word just because it happen's to end in s  :facepalm:

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
We have these threads every once in awhile where we post that one mistake that drives us nuts and drives us to rant and baselessly try to make ourselves sound superior to all those poor, illiterate fools who get it wrong.

My peeve of the day:  "Never mind" is two words.  It isn't "nevermind."  I hate you so much, Kurt Cobain for singlehandedly convincing half the English speaking world to unwittingly spell it incorrectly.  I hate you so much.

As soon as I saw Nirvana in the thread title, I knew you were going to refer to that one. :lol I'll just add it to the incredible long list of reasons to hate Nirvana.

The most common typo I see on forums (that therefore bothers me most just by sheer numbers alone), is confusing their/there/they're.
Also, spelling 'definitely' as 'defiantly'. Whenever I see a sentence like "I defiantly want some ice cream!" I think, "well who are you defying? Why the need to be so rebellious just for ice cream?" How badly are you pronouncing 'definitely' that you could possibly think it's spelled like that?!


Your for You Are is the absolute worst.

But yeah - spelling Definitely as Defiantly is just ridiculous. Not only is it spelled wrong but it's a different word altogether !

Offline wolfking

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 46842
  • Gender: Male
We have these threads every once in awhile where we post that one mistake that drives us nuts and drives us to rant and baselessly try to make ourselves sound superior to all those poor, illiterate fools who get it wrong.

My peeve of the day:  "Never mind" is two words.  It isn't "nevermind."  I hate you so much, Kurt Cobain for singlehandedly convincing half the English speaking world to unwittingly spell it incorrectly.  I hate you so much.

I like this.  I am constantly picking people up on their grammer.  Seriously, people are so fucking stupid.
Everyone else, except Wolfking is wrong.

Offline Tick

  • It's time to make a change
  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9762
  • Gender: Male
  • Just another tricky day for you
Good grammar is not one of my best attributes.
Yup. Tick is dead on.  She's not your type.  Move on.   Tick is Obi Wan Kenobi


Offline jingle.boy

  • I'm so ronery; so sad and ronery
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 44892
  • Gender: Male
  • DTF's resident deceased dictator
People sure have alot of opinions about this.

See what I did there?

Everyone has their typo moments as well, and fat thumbs/auto-correct don't always fix the situation...often make it worse.  Could of is inexcusable though.  Thankfully, I've only seen it a handful of times.  I don't get too bent out of shape.  Some are dyslexic too; some just have literacy challenges when it comes to writing (and/or speaking, and/or spelling ... I know there are a handful of words I ALWAYS spell wrong and have to double-check).
That's a word salad - and take it from me, I know word salad
I fear for the day when something happens on the right that is SO nuts that even Stadler says "That's crazy".
Quote from: Puppies_On_Acid
Remember the mark of a great vocalist is if TAC hates them with a special passion

Offline robwebster

  • Posts: 5021
What I would say about internet grammar, specifically, is that my grammar is my business, and their own grammar is theirs. If I'm having a discussion with someone, I'd rather focus on what they're saying than the way they're saying it. I love the language, and I shudder a little when I see a mistake, but it's not a problem, it's not an edited resource. If we were talking newspapers, bulletins, posters, adverts, song lyrics, cooking instructions, anything professional, sure - but I'm not here to be professional! Unless a spelling or grammar mistake is particularly funny, there's no reason to flag it up.

And in that spirit:

We have these threads every once in awhile where we post that one mistake that drives us nuts and drives us to rant and baselessly try to make ourselves sound superior to all those poor, illiterate fools who get it wrong.

My peeve of the day:  "Never mind" is two words.  It isn't "nevermind."  I hate you so much, Kurt Cobain for singlehandedly convincing half the English speaking world to unwittingly spell it incorrectly.  I hate you so much.

I like this.  I am constantly picking people up on their grammer.  Seriously, people are so fucking stupid.
If this is a joke, it's a brilliant one.

Offline Perpetual Change

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 12264
Good grammar is not one of my best attributes.
Some might say you're completely "mentall"  ;D

I prefer "alot" to "a lot". What is "a lot"? A parking place? Please.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
People sure have alot of opinions about this.

See what I did there?

Everyone has their typo moments as well, and fat thumbs/auto-correct don't always fix the situation...often make it worse.  Could of is inexcusable though.  Thankfully, I've only seen it a handful of times.  I don't get too bent out of shape.  Some are dyslexic too; some just have literacy challenges when it comes to writing (and/or speaking, and/or spelling ... I know there are a handful of words I ALWAYS spell wrong and have to double-check).

i never know how to spel guarantee.

I always have to fluff it and let auto-correct help me out. It's such a weird spelling.

Offline Sir GuitarCozmo

  • Official Forum Sous Chef and broler5
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 13979
  • Gender: Male
  • Kelly Clarkson BEEFS
My extremely aggravating pet peeve at the moment: "would of" "could of" "should of" and the like. How the fuck could someone be so stupid as to think these words together make any sense? They must have absolutely no idea how to use the word "of" or even the meaning of the word if they think this is even remotely correct, because sentences with "could of" make absolutely zero sense. And have they no knowledge of the word "have" at all? :censored

The most annoying parts are: that this is becoming extremely prevalant, I see it on internet forums, on Facebook, everywhere, almost every day. That and it's usually always people who are primarily english-speaking doing this, and not people who learned english as a second language and have an excuse for things like this, which means that these people don't even understand their own, and in many cases only, language.

This, 1,000 times over.  Also your/you're, their/they're, its/it's.

Offline robwebster

  • Posts: 5021
Good grammar is not one of my best attributes.
Some might say you're completely "mentall"  ;D

I prefer "alot" to "a lot". What is "a lot"? A parking place? Please.
Ambiguous numbery thing - like "a dozen," "a few," "a couple."

Dozen's not ambiguous, but you get the gist. Few's closest.

Offline Sir GuitarCozmo

  • Official Forum Sous Chef and broler5
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 13979
  • Gender: Male
  • Kelly Clarkson BEEFS
Makes sense, but I've never understood the problem people have with understanding "a couple".  A couple is always two.

Offline Perpetual Change

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 12264
I get "I bought a lot of clothes", but not "I like that a lot". Before the noun, I'm OK with using "a lot". After the noun, you should use "alot".

Offline robwebster

  • Posts: 5021
I get "I bought a lot of clothes", but not "I like that a lot". Before the noun, I'm OK with using "a lot". After the noun, you should use "alot".
"I like that a bit." "I like that a great deal." "I like that alot."

Spot the odd one out!

As I said - no issues with people using it, fine, don't mind, as long as it's not in a professional capacity. If I can say "alright," you can say "alot." Wouldn't be my choice, but a-okay by me. It's not correct though.

That is - if there is such a thing as correct! I might not like the word I'm about to cite, but if you'll excuse the nepotism, irregardless is officially recognised by Webster. Words are catalogued by usage, and alot gets a lot of usage - but "a lot," certainly, is both widely approved and deeply consistent with the rest of English grammar.

...If there is such a thing as consistent with English grammar.

Offline jingle.boy

  • I'm so ronery; so sad and ronery
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 44892
  • Gender: Male
  • DTF's resident deceased dictator
English grammar could be considered an oxy moron.

One word that gets used a lot in my industry is "incentivize".  This is not a fucking word.  Incentive is the noun ... incent is the verb variant.  I cringe every time I hear incentivize.
That's a word salad - and take it from me, I know word salad
I fear for the day when something happens on the right that is SO nuts that even Stadler says "That's crazy".
Quote from: Puppies_On_Acid
Remember the mark of a great vocalist is if TAC hates them with a special passion

Offline robwebster

  • Posts: 5021
English grammar could be considered an oxy moron.

One word that gets used a lot in my industry is "incentivize".  This is not a fucking word.  Incentive is the noun ... incent is the verb variant.  I cringe every time I hear incentivize.
Incentivise never bothered me! I see what you mean - it's almost like a verb turned into a noun turned into a verb - but I still can't quite get bothered about it. Doing a bit of research, seems like incentivise might be the older word. Both widespread within my lifetime, though. Not sure why I'm so happy with it. Hm!

Purposely, on the other hand - ouch! It's a haemorrhage of an adverb. Be quick, run quickly. Be stealthy, run stealthily. Be... purpose, to run purposely?! No. Purposeful is the adjective. The adverb form should be be purposefully - but I think the word most people are usually getting at is "deliberately." And yet, purposely is verified! Understand why, but I hate that word. It's a blot. An abberation. Nasty little corruption - just feels wrong.

Offline bosk1

  • King of Misdirection
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12827
  • Bow down to Boskaryus
English grammar could be considered an oxy moron.

One word that gets used a lot in my industry is "incentivize".  This is not a fucking word.  Incentive is the noun ... incent is the verb variant.  I cringe every time I hear incentivize.

Well, and besides, it's much more fun to jingle-ize anyway.  Who in their right mind incentivizes when they can jingle-ize instead?  WHO?  Incentivizing is so 2012.
"The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie."

Offline theseoafs

  • When the lights go down in the city, and the sun shines on the bayyyyy
  • Posts: 5573
  • Gender: Male
  • Hello! My name is Elder Price
This is relevant: https://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/2010/04/alot-is-better-than-you-at-everything.html

I get "I bought a lot of clothes", but not "I like that a lot". Before the noun, I'm OK with using "a lot". After the noun, you should use "alot".

Weird opinion.  "Alot" isn't ever a word, and if you're around grammar people such as those that have congregated in this thread, they'll be upset with you.

We had a debate about grammatical errors yesterday, whether they should be called errors and what this indicates about the English language in general. It's definitely an interesting debate.

I'll tell you what, Ali -- I don't know if you've ever had a linguistics class, but the first thing they teach you in one is that there's no such thing as "bad" grammar.  There's "standard" grammar -- the grammar that most people agree on -- and "nonstandard" grammar, which make up the bulk of a person's grammatical "errors".  The fact is that enough people make the same mistake consistently for long enough, it can become a real, true part of the English grammar.

Offline Perpetual Change

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 12264
This is relevant: https://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/2010/04/alot-is-better-than-you-at-everything.html

I get "I bought a lot of clothes", but not "I like that a lot". Before the noun, I'm OK with using "a lot". After the noun, you should use "alot".

Weird opinion.  "Alot" isn't ever a word, and if you're around grammar people such as those that have congregated in this thread, they'll be upset with you.

I am grammar people, and I say alot can be a word.

Offline theseoafs

  • When the lights go down in the city, and the sun shines on the bayyyyy
  • Posts: 5573
  • Gender: Male
  • Hello! My name is Elder Price
Well, I say "Frindle" can be a word.

Offline jingle.boy

  • I'm so ronery; so sad and ronery
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 44892
  • Gender: Male
  • DTF's resident deceased dictator
So is gigormous... as in this thread is now gigormously off topic.

:offtopic:

Not that I really care, I just wanted to use that emot.
That's a word salad - and take it from me, I know word salad
I fear for the day when something happens on the right that is SO nuts that even Stadler says "That's crazy".
Quote from: Puppies_On_Acid
Remember the mark of a great vocalist is if TAC hates them with a special passion