It's a bit more complicated than that. But as relevant to the question you posed, he isn't seeking dissolution of the corporation. He is claiming they couldn't oust him. And part of the problem is that, strictly going by the bylaws, the band has a problem because they never bothered to amend the bylaws after Chris left, and as I recall, the old bylaws say that you need 4/5 to agree to oust somebody. There are several layers of issues, but the other big issue is that he probably wants a lot more out of the payout to get rid of him (including use of the name) than they are willing to give him.