Poll

Which do you prefer?

The Beatles
59 (92.2%)
The Rolling Stones
5 (7.8%)

Total Members Voted: 64

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones  (Read 1934 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline theseoafs

  • When the lights go down in the city, and the sun shines on the bayyyyy
  • Posts: 5573
  • Gender: Male
  • Hello! My name is Elder Price
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #35 on: January 13, 2013, 11:39:53 AM »
Quote from: Zook on January 12, 2013, 05:03:33 PM
Both bands are a product of the times.

Don't really know what this means.  The Beatles singlehandedly revolutionized rock music.  I don't know how anything they did can be considered a "product of the times", since the times were really a product of them.

Anyway, The Stones are fine, but The Beatles are legendary.
Logged

Offline crazyaga

  • Frantic Foxy
  • Posts: 781
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #36 on: January 13, 2013, 11:42:25 AM »
Quote from: Cedar redaC on January 12, 2013, 01:16:47 PM
Two of the biggest bands of all time, and certainly two of the biggest bands of the British Invasion.

Fix me if im wrong, but Pink Floyd are bigger than The Rolling Stones?
Logged
I love beautiful things.

Offline theseoafs

  • When the lights go down in the city, and the sun shines on the bayyyyy
  • Posts: 5573
  • Gender: Male
  • Hello! My name is Elder Price
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #37 on: January 13, 2013, 11:43:47 AM »
Quote from: crazyaga on January 13, 2013, 11:42:25 AM
Quote from: Cedar redaC on January 12, 2013, 01:16:47 PM
Two of the biggest bands of all time, and certainly two of the biggest bands of the British Invasion.

Fix me if im wrong, but Pink Floyd are bigger than The Rolling Stones?

Floyd have sold more records, but they're not a British Invasion band.
Logged

Offline crazyaga

  • Frantic Foxy
  • Posts: 781
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #38 on: January 13, 2013, 11:51:51 AM »
Quote from: theseoafs on January 13, 2013, 11:43:47 AM
Quote from: crazyaga on January 13, 2013, 11:42:25 AM
Quote from: Cedar redaC on January 12, 2013, 01:16:47 PM
Two of the biggest bands of all time, and certainly two of the biggest bands of the British Invasion.

Fix me if im wrong, but Pink Floyd are bigger than The Rolling Stones?

Floyd have sold more records, but they're not a British Invasion band.
why
Logged
I love beautiful things.

Offline theseoafs

  • When the lights go down in the city, and the sun shines on the bayyyyy
  • Posts: 5573
  • Gender: Male
  • Hello! My name is Elder Price
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #39 on: January 13, 2013, 11:52:51 AM »
... Because they're not.
Logged

Offline Zook

  • Evil Incarnate
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 14160
  • Gender: Male
  • Take My Hand
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #40 on: January 13, 2013, 12:11:12 PM »
Quote from: theseoafs on January 13, 2013, 11:39:53 AM
Quote from: Zook on January 12, 2013, 05:03:33 PM
Both bands are a product of the times.

Don't really know what this means.  The Beatles singlehandedly revolutionized rock music.  I don't know how anything they did can be considered a "product of the times", since the times were really a product of them.

Anyway, The Stones are fine, but The Beatles are legendary.

It means I have no argument and I'm just spouting bullshit because I don't like the two bands.
Logged

Offline theseoafs

  • When the lights go down in the city, and the sun shines on the bayyyyy
  • Posts: 5573
  • Gender: Male
  • Hello! My name is Elder Price
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #41 on: January 13, 2013, 12:12:28 PM »
So why make multiple posts in the thread?
Logged

Offline Zook

  • Evil Incarnate
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 14160
  • Gender: Male
  • Take My Hand
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #42 on: January 13, 2013, 12:12:58 PM »
Because I have a keyboard and internet so what the fuck.
Logged

Offline theseoafs

  • When the lights go down in the city, and the sun shines on the bayyyyy
  • Posts: 5573
  • Gender: Male
  • Hello! My name is Elder Price
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #43 on: January 13, 2013, 12:13:45 PM »
Ok.
Logged

Offline Zook

  • Evil Incarnate
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 14160
  • Gender: Male
  • Take My Hand
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #44 on: January 13, 2013, 12:16:00 PM »
Logged

Offline Cedar redaC

  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2292
  • Gender: Male
  • Streams of Light Unite With Water
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #45 on: January 13, 2013, 12:46:35 PM »
Quote from: crazyaga on January 13, 2013, 11:51:51 AM
Quote from: theseoafs on January 13, 2013, 11:43:47 AM
Quote from: crazyaga on January 13, 2013, 11:42:25 AM
Quote from: Cedar redaC on January 12, 2013, 01:16:47 PM
Two of the biggest bands of all time, and certainly two of the biggest bands of the British Invasion.

Fix me if im wrong, but Pink Floyd are bigger than The Rolling Stones?

Floyd have sold more records, but they're not a British Invasion band.
why

As far as I can remember, Pink Floyd didn't really become the massive and influential band they are today until  the 70's.
Logged
Quote from: black_floyd on August 25, 2012, 09:50:25 AM
Perhaps you should ask bosk to reverse the "e" and "a" in the second half of your user name.
Quote from: BlobVanDam on October 30, 2012, 10:10:43 PM
Cedar redaC swoops in for the kill!

Offline Pols Voice

  • Posts: 2323
  • Gender: Male
  • Did ya see the latest Nintendo newsletter?
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #46 on: January 13, 2013, 12:56:11 PM »
The British Invasion was mostly during '64-'66. Floyd's first album was released in August '67 and didn't exactly sell like hotcakes in the US at the time.
Logged
WHOA, NICE GRAPHICS!

Offline WindMaster

  • DTF's Ultimate Frisbee Player
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 1525
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #47 on: January 13, 2013, 01:11:34 PM »
I dislike both bands.

But if I have to vote, I'll go with the Beatles.
Logged
Quote from: skydivingninja on June 24, 2012, 10:29:53 AM
I only listen to electro-post dubprog.  You've probably never heard of it.

Offline Pelata

  • Posts: 223
  • Gender: Male
  • Extremus Melodicus
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #48 on: January 14, 2013, 07:22:23 AM »
In any debate involving The Beatles, The Beatles win because...The Beatles.  :hefdaddy
Logged

Offline Dream Team

  • Posts: 5690
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #49 on: January 14, 2013, 07:34:31 AM »
Another vote for the Fab 4. By light-years.
Logged

Offline Perpetual Change

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 12264
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #50 on: January 14, 2013, 07:39:32 AM »
The Beatles. I'll take them over the Stones chauvinism any day.
Logged

Offline wkiml

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 3925
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #51 on: January 14, 2013, 08:05:16 AM »
There are very few Stones songs I like in general but those that I do I prefer over the Beatles best songs


But overall  the Beatles discography over the Stones , if that makes any sense
Logged
Quote from: senecadawg2 on July 17, 2012, 10:54:32 PM
In defense of peanut butter...

try getting the neighbor's dog to lick your balls with a spoonful of chummus.

Offline Nekov

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 10719
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #52 on: January 14, 2013, 10:40:50 AM »
The Beatles. The Stones had a good run in the 60's and part of the 70's but they never reached the level the Beatles did.
Logged
Quote from: ReaPsTA on June 03, 2014, 06:56:59 AM
When Ginobili gets hot, I get hot in my pants. 

Offline Chino

  • Be excellent to each other.
  • DT.net Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 25330
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #53 on: January 14, 2013, 11:35:28 AM »
The Beatles > Most things.

Most Things > Rolling Stones
Logged

Offline Zook

  • Evil Incarnate
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 14160
  • Gender: Male
  • Take My Hand
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #54 on: January 14, 2013, 11:37:41 AM »
The Beatles > God

amirite?
Logged

Offline wkiml

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 3925
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #55 on: January 14, 2013, 11:50:49 AM »
Quote from: Zook on January 14, 2013, 11:37:41 AM
The Beatles > God

amirite?


No just Jesus...according to John

But than that leads to another debate of Jesus=God...better left for the PR section
Logged
Quote from: senecadawg2 on July 17, 2012, 10:54:32 PM
In defense of peanut butter...

try getting the neighbor's dog to lick your balls with a spoonful of chummus.

Offline Pelata

  • Posts: 223
  • Gender: Male
  • Extremus Melodicus
Re: The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones
« Reply #56 on: January 15, 2013, 07:56:57 AM »
Quote from: wkiml on January 14, 2013, 11:50:49 AM
Quote from: Zook on January 14, 2013, 11:37:41 AM
The Beatles > God

amirite?


No just Jesus...according to John

But than that leads to another debate of Jesus=God...better left for the PR section

If I can be a stickler, John never said "better"...he said "more popular"...which was probably correct.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »