That's what I was kinda getting at with my comments. Whoever created the test seems to feel that being aggressive makes you more masculine and being compassionate makes you more feminine. True, these are traits we've come to associate more with one gender than the other, in general terms, and since the majority of cultures around the world follow those basic lines, then that's what they're using as their bases.
I think it's foolish to try to simplify traits of human personality that much, and just plain stupid to turn around and use it to "identify" or "quantify" one's sexuality by it. I like to think that I'm a reasonably compassionate person. That makes me "feminine"? A woman who has an assertive personality is "masculine"? It's not that simple. Not even close.
I think that being in the "androgynous" or "undifferentiated" areas, rather than at either extreme, simply means that you're a reasonably well-balanced person. It sure as hell doesn't mean that you're sexually confused or someone whose gender isn't readily apparent.