personal cultivation without a license is still illegal.:
That honestly seems like the most bullshit part about this initiative. It's obviously a sell-out to moneyed interests. It honestly reminds me of the kind of nespotism that really started the American Revolution, when the British Parliament tried to give the East Indies Tea Company an obviously hand out, and we had the Tea Party.
By the way, what power of the government is used to argue that you can tell people what they can grow in their back yard? It's always seemed like an obvious Constitutional overstep to me. The Commerce Clause is obviously the rational for how they can prevent trafficking, but growing a plant in your back yard for personal use? What?