Ya....but you hate your vote to just be *pointless*.
It needlessly skews the results though since it creates swing votes that weren't actually swing votes in the first place since the least-favorite track (out of those remaining that is) was still able to be voted for. The point of a survivor is to eliminate songs individually based on honor system voting, not just a self-centered tug of war between folks who are bent on trying to get their way.
Based on this fallibility, I think a far superior method for collecting the most accurate data possible would be a format where each voter has to submit a ranked list of all the songs from a particular album and the points would be awarded in a way similar to how the Associated Press handles their top 25 NCAA football rankings. In that poll, a 1st place vote is worth 25 points, 2nd place is 24 points, and so on, all the way down to a 25th place vote being worth only 1 point.
The main difference would be that instead of the point range being 1-25, it would be dependent on the number of tracks on each album so Images and Words, for example, would have a 1st place vote being worth 8 points, Awake would have it being 11 points, etc. This seems like it would make it difficult to establish a fair scoring system but not necessarily since the albums aren't competing against one another, just each album's tracks amongst themselves and by the time tracks from different albums are competing against each other, they'll all be getting scored evenly since in the finals, consolation, etc., all the songs will be consolidated into one "album" at a time.