Wasnt talking about UHC, I was talking about free higher education which is bullshit and impractical.
but it also ignores the desire s of the people who want UHC. People pushing for UHC also push for cheaper/free higher education.
Thats a generalization of people who want universal health care.
It may have been a bit brash of me to say something broad like that without first reading up on free higher education.
I hate when you do this to me...its not a fallacy. The government has been continuously and more frequently intervening in the private sector recently.
And yes that is a generalizatino, but it's a pretty sound one. Who supports UHC? Liberals. Who supports free higher education? Liberals. I'll admit that I'm sure there's pelnty of exceptions, where some people want one or the other, but not both.
And it's still a slippery slope argument. The only way for it not to be a slippery slope argument is for you to show
directly how UHC and free higher education leads to free food, etc. To put it differently, I'm not saying that you are
wrong, I'm saying you're not giving an argument for it at all. Basing an argument solely upon a slow transgression of events, without arguments of why they would happen - and especially when the end result is absrud - is a slippery slope fallacy.