Author Topic: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2  (Read 339580 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Super Dude

  • Hero of Prog
  • DTF.com Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16265
  • Gender: Male
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1295 on: November 24, 2011, 08:45:46 PM »
Ah, my bad. :P
Quote from: bosk1
As frequently happens, Super Dude nailed it.
:superdude:

Offline MasterShakezula

  • Posts: 3733
  • Owes H $10

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30743
  • Bad Craziness
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1297 on: November 25, 2011, 09:02:29 AM »
Do we have a war thread? Thought this article was interesting. The US is trying to lift the UN ban on cluster bombs, apparently. 

https://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/22/us-pushing-un-cluster-bombs
Cluster bombs are actually pretty damned useful.  I can see arguing for their continued use, but only if you start adding secondary fuses to them so that one way or the other, every munition blows up after it's deployed.  It'd probably also be wise to start making them look different than the food rations we often times drop for civvies. 
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Scheavo

  • Posts: 5444
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1298 on: November 25, 2011, 12:45:43 PM »
https://articles.cnn.com/2011-11-17/justice/justice_dc-white-house-shooting_1_white-house-initial-court-hearing-assassination?_s=PM:JUSTICE

I'm surprised no one's posted this here, as of yet.

The picture they send out of the guy makes him look half sane, but when you see video of the guy talking, he's clearly unstable.

Offline Progmetty

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 7129
  • Gender: Male
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1299 on: November 26, 2011, 08:36:22 AM »
I knew the U.S voted against admitting Palestine into the UNESCO but I didn't know it was gonna make a donation and canceled it because of this. That was so low. I only found out from this Egyptian Political show, the Egyptian Stephen Colbert if you will, it's in Arabic but you can see the slut @ 3:16 and the sheer fucktard expressions while she announces the fund cut. https://youtu.be/vCxw2YsWhtA
If you keep watching til the end you'll notice that it's not even the point he's trying to make; his point is the wealthy Arabian Gulf countries are spending so much insane amounts of money on so much nonsense although they could have proved to the UNESCO in a great stand that we won't all collapse just cause the U.S lobbyists have horns and breath fire. So the blame here really is on the Arab countries.
« Last Edit: November 26, 2011, 09:14:05 AM by metty »
I wouldn't want somebody with 18 kids to mow my damn lawn, based on a longstanding bias I have against crazy fucks.

Offline Sigz

  • BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD
  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13537
  • Gender: Male
  • THRONES FOR THE THRONE SKULL
Quote
The world is a stage, but the play is badly cast.

Offline jsem

  • Posts: 4912
  • Gender: Male
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1301 on: November 26, 2011, 01:01:15 PM »
As usual. The statistics game.

Offline GuineaPig

  • Posts: 3754
  • Gender: Male
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1302 on: November 26, 2011, 01:01:43 PM »
It's moronic.  There's no justification for it.
"In the beginning, the universe was created. This made a lot of people very angry, and has been widely regarded as a bad idea."

Offline Scheavo

  • Posts: 5444
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1303 on: November 26, 2011, 02:21:38 PM »
Driven By Drug War Incentives, Cops Target Pot Smokers, Brush Off Victims Of Violent Crime

Sure makes me glad my town told cops they have to address anything and everything before they deal with pot. They don't always follow it, but they also have trouble seating juries for it anyways.

Offline Super Dude

  • Hero of Prog
  • DTF.com Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16265
  • Gender: Male
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1304 on: November 27, 2011, 09:51:39 PM »
Read this on another forum, in response to that Senate bill allowing home deployment:

Quote
I read about this yesterday. Obama's gotta be drooling with all of the power he's soon to be getting. Not only can he kill American citizens without due process, now he can do it on our own turf and even imprison them if he wants.

There's a good chance I'll be on one of his lists for speaking the truth and posing a threat to him.

That bottom part... :lolpalm:
Quote from: bosk1
As frequently happens, Super Dude nailed it.
:superdude:

Offline Riceball

  • It's the economy, stupid.
  • Posts: 969
  • Gender: Male
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1305 on: November 27, 2011, 10:22:41 PM »
Bender: What is this the Middle Ages?
I punch those numbers into my calculator and they make a happy face.

A $500 Musical Odyssey: Now accepting nominations

Offline antigoon

  • Not Elvis
  • DT.net Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 10293
  • Gender: Male
  • This was a triumph.
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1306 on: November 27, 2011, 11:35:29 PM »
I've gotta be on a list somewhere for buying this book for class a few years ago :lol

Offline Scheavo

  • Posts: 5444
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1307 on: November 29, 2011, 05:19:24 PM »
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/nov/29/senate-defies-obama-veto-threat-terrorist-custody-/


Quote
Defying a veto threat from President Obama, the Senate voted Tuesday to preserve language that would give the U.S. military a crack at al Qaeda operatives captured in the U.S., even if they are American citizens.

The White House and its Senate allies objected and tried to block the changes, instead calling for the issue to be studied further.

They argued giving the military priority could complicate investigations into terrorist suspects in the U.S., and said it opens the door to indefinite military detention of U.S. citizens.

Not sure if the defense of Habeus Corpus is sincere, but I think this is an example of one area where McCain and Obama might have come to different conclusions.

Offline Super Dude

  • Hero of Prog
  • DTF.com Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16265
  • Gender: Male
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1308 on: November 29, 2011, 05:58:39 PM »
Good to see Obama is trying to fight this one. See? He ain't all bad.
Quote from: bosk1
As frequently happens, Super Dude nailed it.
:superdude:

Offline antigoon

  • Not Elvis
  • DT.net Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 10293
  • Gender: Male
  • This was a triumph.
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1309 on: December 01, 2011, 08:02:43 AM »
I think the Obama Administration just doesn't want the military messing with its executive authority in those areas.

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30743
  • Bad Craziness
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1310 on: December 01, 2011, 08:20:10 AM »
I suspect that their rationale is exactly what the quote says.  The federales have already given themselves the right to do whateverthehell they want to American citizens,  whenever and however they want.  There's no need to try and move that authority over to the military, as people would balk about it (which they should have done 10 years ago).  It would just be a huge layer of complication in a situation that already favors them greatly.

I'm surprised that the Republicans don't get that, as they're the ones who should be so happy about the decimation of habeas corpus.   I suspect that they're just trying to put forth a "strong on terror" front, and involving the military,  useful or otherwise,  is a good way to go about it.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline antigoon

  • Not Elvis
  • DT.net Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 10293
  • Gender: Male
  • This was a triumph.
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1311 on: December 01, 2011, 08:43:33 AM »
Yes, thanks for expanding.

Also, I don't know what took me this long (3 years) but I've finally unsubscribed from Obama's campaign emails. The one that did it was an email I just got from the First Lady saying that if I donated $30 or something like that I could be entered into a contest to have dinner with her and the President. No thank you :lol

edit: it was $3, not $30.
« Last Edit: December 01, 2011, 09:05:24 AM by antigoon »

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30743
  • Bad Craziness
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1312 on: December 01, 2011, 09:43:39 AM »
Hey,  I think he's a crappy president,  but I'd be all over a dinner at the White House. 
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline antigoon

  • Not Elvis
  • DT.net Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 10293
  • Gender: Male
  • This was a triumph.
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1313 on: December 01, 2011, 10:18:56 AM »
I don't know what I would talk to him about. I feel like it would be extremely uncomfortable and awkward for me.

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30743
  • Bad Craziness
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1314 on: December 01, 2011, 11:23:00 AM »
Ask him what it's like being black. 

Seriously,  you'd be one of 20 guests.  I doubt you'd get much conversation time with the guy.  My guess is that you'd spend more time talking to the girl scout sitting next to you that sold the most cookies that year. 
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline antigoon

  • Not Elvis
  • DT.net Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 10293
  • Gender: Male
  • This was a triumph.
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1315 on: December 01, 2011, 11:42:20 AM »
:lol I'd just go on behalf of EPICVIEW and ask how his buddies Alinsky, Wright, Soros, and Uncle Odinga are doing.

Offline chknptpie

  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3759
  • Gender: Female
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1316 on: December 01, 2011, 11:58:03 AM »
:lol I'd just go on behalf of EPICVIEW and ask how his buddies Alinsky, Wright, Soros, and Uncle Odinga are doing.

CIA has now made it impossible for you to win this raffle...  :lol
« Last Edit: December 01, 2011, 12:03:42 PM by chknptpie »

Offline antigoon

  • Not Elvis
  • DT.net Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 10293
  • Gender: Male
  • This was a triumph.
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1317 on: December 01, 2011, 11:59:36 AM »
:lol Oh ALSO, I'll need to see that birth certificate in person

Offline Scheavo

  • Posts: 5444
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1318 on: December 01, 2011, 02:15:08 PM »
I think the Obama Administration just doesn't want the military messing with its executive authority in those areas.

This doesn't make sense to me though... Obama is the Commander in Chief, so how is giving the military priority in any way undermine Obama's authority?

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30743
  • Bad Craziness
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1319 on: December 01, 2011, 02:53:36 PM »
It would undermine his executive authority.  He's got everything he wants right now in terms of the ability to hose us all,  and trying to expand that to the military would raise flags, suspicions, objections,  and basically just more attention that he wants or needs. 
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Scheavo

  • Posts: 5444
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1320 on: December 01, 2011, 03:37:37 PM »
But it's still under his executive authority? I'm obviously missing something hear. Undermining his authority would be to give this power to Congress, not give it to Obama in a different way.

I think the bill would be damaging in other ways, but not becuase it "undermines" Obama's authority. He would still have authority over the cases, he would still be able to authoritatively decide how the cases would be handled, etc.

Offline El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30743
  • Bad Craziness
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1321 on: December 01, 2011, 04:03:17 PM »
What I'm saying is that I think adding a whole new layer of complication and scrutiny to the powers he already has would weaken and jeopardize them.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline XJDenton

  • What a shame
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 7628
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman

Offline Super Dude

  • Hero of Prog
  • DTF.com Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16265
  • Gender: Male
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1323 on: December 03, 2011, 07:39:54 AM »
If anyone would like a lighthearted look back, here's This Land by JibJab, back from the '04 elections:

https://sendables.jibjab.com/originals/this_land
Quote from: bosk1
As frequently happens, Super Dude nailed it.
:superdude:

Offline antigoon

  • Not Elvis
  • DT.net Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 10293
  • Gender: Male
  • This was a triumph.
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1324 on: December 03, 2011, 10:59:16 AM »
It's weird to think about how popular that video was back then :lol

Offline antigoon

  • Not Elvis
  • DT.net Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 10293
  • Gender: Male
  • This was a triumph.

Offline chknptpie

  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3759
  • Gender: Female
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1326 on: December 08, 2011, 11:23:29 AM »
"Partial remains" ... does that mean like someone's cremated leg, another persons cremated arm... and things along those lines?

Offline Super Dude

  • Hero of Prog
  • DTF.com Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16265
  • Gender: Male
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1327 on: December 08, 2011, 04:53:33 PM »
The Allied American forces did that to corpses they found at the concentration and death camps. The reason for that was sanitation, don't know if it applies here but possibly.
Quote from: bosk1
As frequently happens, Super Dude nailed it.
:superdude:

Offline Super Dude

  • Hero of Prog
  • DTF.com Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16265
  • Gender: Male
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1328 on: December 09, 2011, 12:15:38 PM »
And if y'all want something else to chew on for a bit:

https://www.cnbc.com/id/45612773/

Why Is Eric Cantor Blocking the Congressional Insider Trading Act?
Quote from: bosk1
As frequently happens, Super Dude nailed it.
:superdude:

Offline antigoon

  • Not Elvis
  • DT.net Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 10293
  • Gender: Male
  • This was a triumph.
Re: The P/R-side Chat Thread v.2
« Reply #1329 on: December 09, 2011, 01:07:25 PM »
'cos he's a huge fucking douchebag :lol